Suppr超能文献

免疫球蛋白与造血干细胞移植治疗慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病的成本效益分析

The Cost Effectiveness of Immunoglobulin vs. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for CIDP.

作者信息

Burt Richard K, Tappenden Paul, Balabanov Roumen, Han Xiaoqiang, Quigley Kathleen, Snowden John A, Sharrack Basil

机构信息

Division of Immunotherapy, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.

Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Mar 22;12:645263. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.645263. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is effective as standard first line therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), but some patients remain dependent on its long-term use. Recently, we have reported that autologous non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective second line therapy for CIDP. To compare the cost of chronic IVIG vs. autologous HSCT (a one-time therapy), we collected data on patients with CIDP undergoing HSCT between 2017 and 2019. This was compared with published literature on the costs and efficacy defined by the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause And Treatment (INCAT) disability score, Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score, hand grip strength, and SF-36 quality of life (QOL) for CIDP. Between 2017 and 2019, nineteen patients with chronic CIDP (mean disease treatment duration prior to HSCT of 6 years) underwent autologous HSCT with mean cost of $108,577 per patient (range $56,327-277,119, standard deviation $53,092). After HSCT, 80% of patients remain IVIG and immune treatment free for up to 5 years. In comparison, published cost of IVIG treatment in the USA for an average CIDP patient exceeds $136,000 per year. Despite remaining treatment free, HSCT demonstrated greater improvement in efficacy compared to immunoglobulins. Given the long-term treatment-free remission and better outcome measurements, autologous HSCT is more cost effective than long-term IVIG treatment in patients with chronic CIDP. However, costs will depend on patient selection, the HSCT regimen, and regional variations. Further analysis of the health economics, i.e., cost/outcome ratio, of HSCT as therapy for chronically IVIG dependent CIDP is warranted.

摘要

静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)作为慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病(CIDP)的标准一线治疗方法是有效的,但一些患者仍依赖其长期使用。最近,我们报道了自体非清髓性造血干细胞移植(HSCT)是CIDP的一种有效的二线治疗方法。为了比较慢性IVIG治疗与自体HSCT(一次性治疗)的成本,我们收集了2017年至2019年间接受HSCT的CIDP患者的数据。将其与关于CIDP的炎症性神经病病因与治疗(INCAT)残疾评分、医学研究委员会(MRC)总分、握力和SF - 36生活质量(QOL)所定义的成本和疗效的已发表文献进行比较。在2017年至2019年间,19例慢性CIDP患者(HSCT前平均疾病治疗时长为6年)接受了自体HSCT,每位患者的平均成本为108,577美元(范围为56,327 - 277,119美元,标准差为53,092美元)。HSCT后,80%的患者在长达5年的时间里无需IVIG和免疫治疗。相比之下,美国平均CIDP患者的IVIG治疗公布成本每年超过136,000美元。尽管无需进一步治疗,但与免疫球蛋白相比,HSCT在疗效方面有更大改善。鉴于长期无治疗缓解以及更好的疗效指标,自体HSCT在慢性CIDP患者中比长期IVIG治疗更具成本效益。然而,成本将取决于患者选择、HSCT方案以及地区差异。有必要对HSCT作为慢性IVIG依赖型CIDP治疗方法的卫生经济学,即成本/效益比,进行进一步分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c63e/8019941/8a761dd01566/fneur-12-645263-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验