Suppr超能文献

一页文本:常规精读、略读和拼写检查过程中的眼动情况。

One page of text: Eye movements during regular and thorough reading, skimming, and spell checking.

作者信息

Strukelj Alexander, Niehorster Diederick C

机构信息

Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Sweden.

The Humanities Laboratory, Lund University, Sweden.

出版信息

J Eye Mov Res. 2018 Feb 26;11(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.11.1.1.

Abstract

Eye movements during regular reading, thorough reading, skimming, and spell checking of single pages of text were measured, to investigate how high-level reading tasks elicited by instructions affect reading behavior. Word frequency and word length effects were found. All results were compared to regular reading. Thorough reading involved longer total reading times and more rereading, and resulted in higher comprehension scores. Skimming involved longer saccades, shorter average fixation durations, more word skipping, shorter total reading times evenly distributed across the page, and resulted in lower comprehension scores. Spell checking involved shorter saccades, longer average fixation durations, less word skipping, longer total reading times evenly distributed across the entire page, and resulted in lower comprehension scores. Replicating local effects shows that paragraphs maintain sufficient experimental rigor, while also enabling reading analyses from a global perspective. Compared to regular reading, thorough reading was more elaborate and less uniform, skimming was faster and more uniform, and spell checking was slower and more uniform.

摘要

研究人员测量了在常规阅读、精读、略读以及对单页文本进行拼写检查时的眼动情况,以探究指令引发的高级阅读任务如何影响阅读行为。研究发现了词频和词长效应。所有结果均与常规阅读进行了比较。精读涉及更长的总阅读时间和更多的重读,并且导致更高的理解分数。略读涉及更长的扫视、更短的平均注视持续时间、更多的跳读、在页面上均匀分布的更短总阅读时间,并且导致更低的理解分数。拼写检查涉及更短的扫视、更长的平均注视持续时间、更少的跳读、在整个页面上均匀分布的更长总阅读时间,并且导致更低的理解分数。重复局部效应表明,段落保持了足够的实验严谨性,同时也能够从全局角度进行阅读分析。与常规阅读相比,精读更精细且更不统一,略读更快且更统一,而拼写检查更慢且更统一。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验