Suppr超能文献

文本与语篇处理中的可及性。

Accessibility in Text and Discourse Processing.

作者信息

Sanders Ted J M, Gernsbacher Morton Ann

机构信息

Utrecht institute of Linguistics UiL OTS, Utrecht University.

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

Discourse Process. 2004 Apr;37(2):79-89. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp3702_1.

Abstract

Accessibility is one of the most important challenges at the intersection of linguistic and psycholinguistic studies of text and discourse processing. Linguists have shown how linguistic indicators of referential coherence show a systematic pattern: Longer linguistic forms (like full lexical NPs) tend to be used when referents are relatively low accessible, shorter forms (pronouns and zero anaphora) are used when referents are highly accessible. This linguistic theory fits in nicely with a dynamic view of text and discourse processing: When a reader proceeds through a text, the activation of concepts as part of the reader's representation fluctuates constantly. Hypotheses considering activation patterns can be tested with on-line research methods like reading time or eye-movement recording. The articles in this special issue show how accessibility phenomena need to be studied from a linguistic and a psycholinguistic angle, and in the latter case from interpretation as well as production.

摘要

可及性是文本与语篇处理的语言学和心理语言学研究交叉领域中最重要的挑战之一。语言学家已经表明,指称连贯的语言指标呈现出一种系统模式:当所指对象的可及性相对较低时,倾向于使用较长的语言形式(如完整的词汇名词短语);当所指对象的可及性较高时,则使用较短的形式(代词和零指代)。这种语言理论与文本和语篇处理的动态观点非常契合:当读者阅读一篇文本时,作为读者表征一部分的概念激活会不断波动。考虑激活模式的假设可以通过阅读时间或眼动记录等在线研究方法进行测试。本期特刊中的文章展示了可及性现象需要从语言学和心理语言学角度进行研究,而在心理语言学角度下,还需要从理解和产出两方面进行研究。

相似文献

1
Accessibility in Text and Discourse Processing.文本与语篇处理中的可及性。
Discourse Process. 2004 Apr;37(2):79-89. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp3702_1.
6
Targeting in Language: Unifying Deixis and Anaphora.语言中的指称:统一指示语与回指
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 1;11:2016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02016. eCollection 2020.
9
The processing of coreference for reduced expressions in discourse integration.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 Jan;30(1):21-35. doi: 10.1023/a:1005252123299.

本文引用的文献

1
Discourse comprehension.语篇理解
Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:163-89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.163.
2
Cataphoric devices in spoken discourse.口语语篇中的前指手段。
Cogn Psychol. 1995 Aug;29(1):24-58. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1995.1011.
3
The cataphoric use of the indefinite this in spoken narratives.
Mem Cognit. 1989 Sep;17(5):536-40. doi: 10.3758/bf03197076.
4
Mechanisms that improve referential access.改善指代访问的机制。
Cognition. 1989 Jul;32(2):99-156. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90001-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验