• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息收集框架——阅读过程中回视眼动的认知模型。

The Information Gathering Framework - a Cognitive Model of Regressive Eye Movements during Reading.

作者信息

Weiss Anna Fiona

机构信息

University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany.

出版信息

J Eye Mov Res. 2020 Jul 31;13(4). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.4.4.

DOI:10.16910/jemr.13.4.4
PMID:33828803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7888242/
Abstract

In this article we present a new eye movement control framework that describes the interaction between fixation durations and regressive saccades during reading: The Information Gathering Framework (IGF). Based on the FC model proposed by Bicknell and Levy [15], the basic idea of the IGF is that a confidence level for each word is computed while being monitored by three independent thresholds. These thresholds shape eye movement behavior by increasing fixation duration, triggering a regression, or guiding regression target selection. In this way, the IGF does not only account for regressive eye movements but also provides a framework able to model eye movement control during reading across different scenarios. Importantly, within the IGF it is assumed that two different types of regressive eye movements exist which differ with regard to their releases (integrations difficulties vs. missing evidence) but also with regard to their time course. We tested the predictions of the IGF by re-analyzing an experiment of Weiss et al. [57] and found, inter alia, clear evidence for shorter fixation durations before regressive saccades relative to progressive saccades, with the exception of the last region. This clearly supports the assumptions of the IGF. In addition, we found evidence that there exists a window of about 15-20 characters to the left of the current fixation that plays an important role in target selection, probably indicating the perceptual span during a regressive saccade.

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一种新的眼动控制框架,该框架描述了阅读过程中注视持续时间和回退扫视之间的相互作用:信息收集框架(IGF)。基于Bicknell和Levy [15]提出的FC模型,IGF的基本思想是在由三个独立阈值监控的同时,计算每个单词的置信度水平。这些阈值通过增加注视持续时间、触发回退或指导回退目标选择来塑造眼动行为。通过这种方式,IGF不仅解释了回退眼动,还提供了一个能够对不同场景下阅读过程中的眼动控制进行建模的框架。重要的是,在IGF中假设存在两种不同类型的回退眼动,它们在释放方面(整合困难与证据缺失)以及时间进程方面都有所不同。我们通过重新分析Weiss等人[57]的一项实验来检验IGF的预测,除最后一个区域外,尤其发现了相对于前进扫视,回退扫视前注视持续时间更短的明确证据。这明显支持了IGF的假设。此外,我们发现有证据表明,在当前注视点左侧约15 - 20个字符的窗口在目标选择中起着重要作用,这可能表明了回退扫视期间的感知跨度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/2b2f91c0d65b/jemr-13-04-d-figure-07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/d73ad834be09/jemr-13-04-d-figure-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/3014ed7f8c36/jemr-13-04-d-figure-02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/ddf397128a7d/jemr-13-04-d-figure-03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/feb8cdfd600d/jemr-13-04-d-figure-04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/7fbccbdf9ee9/jemr-13-04-d-figure-05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/3f1a72f646f9/jemr-13-04-d-figure-06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/2b2f91c0d65b/jemr-13-04-d-figure-07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/d73ad834be09/jemr-13-04-d-figure-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/3014ed7f8c36/jemr-13-04-d-figure-02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/ddf397128a7d/jemr-13-04-d-figure-03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/feb8cdfd600d/jemr-13-04-d-figure-04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/7fbccbdf9ee9/jemr-13-04-d-figure-05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/3f1a72f646f9/jemr-13-04-d-figure-06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/146f/7888242/2b2f91c0d65b/jemr-13-04-d-figure-07.jpg

相似文献

1
The Information Gathering Framework - a Cognitive Model of Regressive Eye Movements during Reading.信息收集框架——阅读过程中回视眼动的认知模型。
J Eye Mov Res. 2020 Jul 31;13(4). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.4.4.
2
Targeting regressions: do readers pay attention to the left?目标回归:读者是否关注左侧?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1108-13. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0291-1.
3
An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading.中文阅读过程中文字处理和眼动控制的综合模型。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;127(6):1139-1162. doi: 10.1037/rev0000248. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Eye movement patterns in hemianopic dyslexia.偏盲性诵读困难中的眼球运动模式。
Brain. 1995 Aug;118 ( Pt 4):891-912. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.4.891.
5
Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is not cumulative across multiple saccades.阅读中副中央凹预视效益不会在多个扫视中累积。
Vision Res. 2005 Jun;45(14):1829-34. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.008.
6
The adaptive nature of eye movements in linguistic tasks: how payoff and architecture shape speed-accuracy trade-offs.语言任务中眼球运动的适应性:收益和结构如何塑造速度-准确性权衡。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):581-610. doi: 10.1111/tops.12032. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
7
Eye movement control in Turkish sentence reading.土耳其语句子阅读中的眼球运动控制。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Feb;74(2):377-397. doi: 10.1177/1747021820963310. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
8
Eye movement guidance in reading: the role of parafoveal letter and space information.阅读中的眼动引导:副中央凹字母和空格信息的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 May;16(2):268-81. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.2.268.
9
Parafoveal access to word stem during reading: An eye movement study.阅读时词干的副中央凹获取:一项眼动研究。
Cognition. 2021 Mar;208:104547. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104547. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
10
Word frequency, predictability, and return-sweep saccades: Towards the modeling of eye movements during paragraph reading.词汇频率、可预测性和回扫扫视:朝向段落阅读中眼球运动的建模。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Dec;45(12):1614-1633. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000694. Epub 2019 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Accounting for Visual Field Abnormalities when Using Eye-tracking to Diagnose Reading Problems in Neurological Degeneration.在使用眼动追踪技术诊断神经退行性疾病中的阅读问题时考虑视野异常。
J Eye Mov Res. 2024 Jul 4;17(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.17.2.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Metacognitive monitoring and metacognitive strategies of gifted and average children on dealing with deductive reasoning task.资优儿童与普通儿童在处理演绎推理任务时的元认知监控与元认知策略
J Eye Mov Res. 2021 Sep 14;14(4). doi: 10.16910/jemr.14.4.1. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Regressions during Reading.阅读过程中的回归
Vision (Basel). 2019 Jul 9;3(3):35. doi: 10.3390/vision3030035.
2
Comprehension demands modulate re-reading, but not first pass reading behavior.理解需求会调节重读行为,但不会调节首次阅读行为。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Mar 16:1-37. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1307862.
3
The Importance of Reading Naturally: Evidence From Combined Recordings of Eye Movements and Electric Brain Potentials.自然阅读的重要性:来自眼动和脑电联合记录的证据
Cogn Sci. 2017 May;41 Suppl 6:1232-1263. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12384. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
4
Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures.为何要重读?来自花园小径和局部连贯结构的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jul;70(7):1380-1405. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1186200. Epub 2016 May 25.
5
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?我们所说的语言理解中的预测是什么意思?
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(1):32-59. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
6
Don't believe what you read (only once): comprehension is supported by regressions during reading.不要轻信你读到的内容(仅一次):阅读过程中的回归有助于理解。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jun;25(6):1218-26. doi: 10.1177/0956797614531148. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
7
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension.语言产生与理解的统一理论。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):329-47. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001495. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
8
Targeting regressions: do readers pay attention to the left?目标回归:读者是否关注左侧?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1108-13. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0291-1.
9
Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension.作为语言理解决定因素的记忆干扰
Lang Linguist Compass. 2012 Apr 1;6(4):193-211. doi: 10.1002/lnc3.330. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
10
Perceptions as hypotheses: saccades as experiments.作为假设的感知:作为实验的扫视。
Front Psychol. 2012 May 28;3:151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00151. eCollection 2012.