Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna and Fondazione CNR Regione Toscana G. Monasterio, Pisa, Italy.
J Appl Lab Med. 2021 Sep 1;6(5):1237-1250. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfab017.
The aim of this study was to evaluate both analytical characteristics and clinical results of a new chemiluminescent method for the measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), named VITROS ® High Sensitivity Troponin I Assay, using the VITROS® 3600 automated platform. The results found with this new method were compared to those observed with hs-cTnI ARCHITECT and ECLIA hs-cTnT ELECSYS methods.
For evaluation of analytical performance and comparison of clinical results, plasma samples (lithium-heparin), were collected from apparently healthy subjects and patients with cardiovascular diseases.
The hs-cTnI VITROS method showed values for limit of blank (LoB 0.33 ng/L), limit of detection (LoD, 0.91 ng/L), limit of quantifications at 20% (LoQ 20% CV, 1.82 ng/L), and 10% (LoQ 10% CV, 4,74 ng/L), which are comparable to those previously reported for other hs-cTnI methods. Moreover, the clinical results of the hs-cTnI VITROS method were found to be closely correlated to those of hs-cTnI ARCHITECT (R = 0,9883, N = 198) and ECLIA hs-cTnT Elecsys (R = 0,9704, N = 293) methods.
The hs-cTnI VITROS method shows analytical performance comparable to other cTnI and cTnT assay. The results of this study confirm that there are significant systematic differences among hs-cTnI methods. Further multicenter studies using larger reference populations are needed in order to obtain a better estimation, especially of the 99° percentile URL values categorized for sex and age of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT methods.
本研究旨在评估一种新的化学发光法测量心肌肌钙蛋白 I(cTnI)的分析特性和临床结果,该方法名为 VITROS ® 高敏肌钙蛋白 I 检测,使用 VITROS® 3600 自动化平台。将新方法的结果与 hs-cTnI ARCHITECT 和 ECLIA hs-cTnT ELECSYS 方法的观察结果进行比较。
为了评估分析性能并比较临床结果,从表面健康的受试者和心血管疾病患者采集血浆样本(锂肝素)。
hs-cTnI VITROS 方法的空白限(LoB)为 0.33ng/L,检测限(LoD)为 0.91ng/L,20%定量限(LoQ 20%CV)为 1.82ng/L,10%定量限(LoQ 10%CV)为 4.74ng/L,这些值与其他 hs-cTnI 方法的报道值相当。此外,hs-cTnI VITROS 方法的临床结果与 hs-cTnI ARCHITECT(R=0.9883,N=198)和 ECLIA hs-cTnT Elecsys(R=0.9704,N=293)方法的结果密切相关。
hs-cTnI VITROS 方法的分析性能与其他 cTnI 和 cTnT 检测方法相当。本研究的结果证实,hs-cTnI 方法之间存在显著的系统差异。需要进一步进行多中心研究,使用更大的参考人群,以更好地估计 hs-cTnI 和 hs-cTnT 方法的 99°百分位 URL 值,特别是根据性别和年龄进行分类。