Hu Rui, Hu Ting, Zhang Zhu, Wang Jia-Min, Li Qin-Qin, Yang Yun-Yuan, Xiao Li-Ke, Zhu Hong-Mei, Li Ling-Ping, Zhang Li-Li, Wang He, Liu Shan-Ling
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Mar;52(2):319-325. doi: 10.12182/20210360602.
To explore the application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) technology in the prenatal diagnostic assessment of abnormal serological prenatal screening results of Down's syndrome (DS).
A total of 3 578 amniotic fluid samples from pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis solely due to abnormal serological prenatal screening results were selected. The samples were categorized into 3 groups, 2 624 in the high-risk group, 662 in the borderline-risk group, and 292 in the abnormal multiple of median (MoM) group. a-CGH was performed on the Agilent CGX (8×60K) platform and the data were analyzed by the Genoglyphix software.
The overall detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 3.38% (121/3 578). Among the chromosomal abnormalities, 49.59% (60/121) was aneuploidies, 42.15% (51/121) was pathogenic copy number variants (pCNVs), and 8.26% (10/121) was likely pathogenic CNVs (lpCNVs). The detection rate of copy number variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was 1.03% (37/3 578). In the high-risk, the borderline-risk and the abnormal MoM groups, the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 3.54% (93/2 624), 2.87% (19/662) and 3.08% (9/292), respectively; the detection rate of p/lp CNVs was 1.64% (43/2 624), 1.81% (12/662) and 2.05% (6/292), respectively; the detection rate of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 was 1.37% (36/2 624), 0.76% (5/662) and 0.34% (1/292) in the three groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in all the detection rate among these groups ( >0.05). One sample with X(51)/XYY(49) confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was misdiagnosed by a-CGH.
Prenatal diagnosis with a-CGH is of great significance for reducing birth defects in pregnancies with abnormal serological prenatal screening results of DS. It can also be used to detect CNVs of microdeletion/microduplication syndromes.
探讨基于芯片的比较基因组杂交(a-CGH)技术在唐氏综合征(DS)血清学产前筛查结果异常的产前诊断评估中的应用。
选取因血清学产前筛查结果异常而单纯接受羊膜腔穿刺术进行产前诊断的孕妇的3578份羊水样本。样本分为3组,高危组2624份,临界风险组662份,中位数倍数异常(MoM)组292份。在安捷伦CGX(8×60K)平台上进行a-CGH,并使用Genoglyphix软件分析数据。
染色体异常的总体检出率为3.38%(121/3578)。在染色体异常中,49.59%(60/121)为非整倍体,42.15%(51/121)为致病性拷贝数变异(pCNV),8.26%(10/121)为可能致病性CNV(lpCNV)。意义不明确的拷贝数变异(VUS)检出率为1.03%(37/3578)。在高危组、临界风险组和MoM异常组中,染色体异常检出率分别为3.54%(93/2624)、2.87%(19/662)和3.08%(9/292);p/lp CNV检出率分别为1.64%(43/2624)、1.81%(12/662)和2.05%(6/292);三组中21三体和18三体的检出率分别为1.37%(36/2624)、0.76%(5/662)和0.34%(1/292)。这些组间所有检出率均无显著差异(P>0.05)。1份经荧光原位杂交(FISH)确诊为X(51)/XYY(49)的样本被a-CGH误诊。
a-CGH产前诊断对于降低DS血清学产前筛查结果异常的妊娠中的出生缺陷具有重要意义。它还可用于检测微缺失/微重复综合征的CNV。