Washington State University, USA.
University of Miami, USA.
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Jan;31(1):53-69. doi: 10.1177/09636625211005249. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
Understanding causality is a critical part of developing preventive and treatment actions against cancer. Three main causality models-necessary, sufficient-component, and probabilistic causality have been commonly used to explain the causation between causal factors and risks in health science. However, news media do not usually follow a strict protocol to report the causality of health risks. The purpose of this study was to describe and understand how the causation of cancer was articulated on news media. A content analysis of 471 newspaper articles published in the United States during two time-frames (2007-2008 and 2017-2018) was conducted. The analysis showed that probabilistic causality was most frequently used to explain the causal relationship between risk factors and cancer. The findings also uncovered other important details of news framing, including types and characteristics of risk factors, intervention measures, and sources of evidence. The results provided theoretical and practical implications for public understanding and assessment of cancer risks.
理解因果关系是制定癌症预防和治疗措施的关键部分。在健康科学中,有三种主要的因果模型——必要、充分成分和概率因果关系,用于解释因果因素与风险之间的因果关系。然而,新闻媒体通常不会遵循严格的协议来报告健康风险的因果关系。本研究的目的是描述和理解癌症的因果关系如何在新闻媒体上得到阐述。对在美国两个时间段(2007-2008 年和 2017-2018 年)发布的 471 篇报纸文章进行了内容分析。分析表明,概率因果关系最常用于解释危险因素与癌症之间的因果关系。研究结果还揭示了新闻报道框架的其他重要细节,包括危险因素的类型和特征、干预措施以及证据来源。研究结果为公众理解和评估癌症风险提供了理论和实践意义。