Suppr超能文献

胆胰疾病:经腹超声与内镜超声评估。

Pancreatobiliary Diseases: Evaluation by Transabdominal and Endoscopic Ultrasound.

机构信息

Professor Dr Bimal Chandra Shil, Professor & Head, Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital (SSMC&MH), Dhaka, Bangladesh; E-mail:

出版信息

Mymensingh Med J. 2021 Apr;30(2):458-465.

Abstract

Pancreaticobiliary diseases are the important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Among the imaging modalities, Transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) is cheap, available, and noninvasive but it has some limitations. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is invasive but it has some diagnostic and therapeutic advantages over TUS. This study was aimed to see the diagnostic yields of EUS and TUS in the pancreatobiliary diseases. This cross sectional study was conducted in Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital (SSMC&MH), Dhaka, Bangladesh from March 2017 to February 2019. All (n=222) patients were evaluated clinically and with relevant investigations. TUS and EUS were done in all patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was done in 60 patients. Among 222 patients 56.8% were males; mean age was 46±16 years; the main presenting symptoms were abdominal pain and jaundice. In diseases of biliary tree, EUS showed dilated CBD alone or in combination with stone in 50 and 67 cases and TUS showed 37, 63 patients respectively. The difference between the findings of EUS and TUS was statistically significant (p=0.00). In gall bladder, EUS found microlithiasis in 6(2.6%) and sludges in 24(10.8%) cases whereas TUS found microlithiasis in 1(0.5%) and sludges in 17(7.7%) cases respectively (p=0.00). Both EUS and TUS detected cholelithiasis in equal number of patients 46(20.3%). On pancreatic evaluation, EUS and TUS detected pancreatic parenchymal abnormalities in 24(10.8%) and 12(5.5%) patients respectively with significant p value (0.00). In cases of pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma the difference between the findings of EUS and TUS were statistically significant (p<0.05). EUS detected 7 cases of ampullary/peri-ampullary neoplasms whereas TUS detected only 2 cases. The sensitivity of EUS for detecting CBD dilatation, CBD stones, CBD SOL and pancreatic SOL was 85%, 91%, 93%, and 92% respectively. The sensitivity of TUS for detecting CBD dilatation, CBD stones, CBD SOL and pancreatic SOL was 42%, 52%, 40%, and 37% respectively. EUS is more sensitive than TUS in diagnosing pancreaticobiliary disorders. It is of paramount importance in patients in diagnosing CBD dilatation, choledocholithiasis, biliary microlithiasis and pancreaticobiliary neoplasm. EUS has important role before proceeding to further management by more invasive techniques like ERCP or surgery.

摘要

胰胆疾病是全球发病率和死亡率的重要原因。在各种影像学检查方法中,经腹超声(TUS)价格低廉、易于获得且为非侵入性检查,但也存在一些局限性。内镜超声(EUS)虽然为有创性检查,但在诊断和治疗方面优于 TUS。本研究旨在比较 EUS 和 TUS 对胰胆疾病的诊断价值。本研究为 2017 年 3 月至 2019 年 2 月在孟加拉国达卡的萨尔利姆拉勒医学学院米福德医院(SSMC&MH)进行的一项横断面研究。所有(n=222)患者均接受了临床和相关检查。所有患者均进行了 TUS 和 EUS 检查,60 例患者进行了内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)检查。222 例患者中,男性占 56.8%;平均年龄为 46±16 岁;主要症状为腹痛和黄疸。在胆道疾病中,EUS 显示单独或联合结石扩张 CBD 的比例为 50%和 67%,TUS 显示 37%和 63%。EUS 和 TUS 的检查结果存在统计学差异(p=0.00)。在胆囊疾病中,EUS 发现 6 例(2.6%)微结石和 24 例(10.8%)胆汁淤积,而 TUS 发现 1 例(0.5%)微结石和 17 例(7.7%)胆汁淤积,差异有统计学意义(p=0.00)。EUS 和 TUS 均发现 46 例(20.3%)胆囊结石。在胰腺评估中,EUS 和 TUS 分别发现 24 例(10.8%)和 12 例(5.5%)患者胰腺实质异常,差异有统计学意义(p=0.00)。在胰腺和胆管癌的情况下,EUS 和 TUS 的检查结果存在统计学差异(p<0.05)。EUS 发现 7 例壶腹/壶腹周围肿瘤,而 TUS 仅发现 2 例。EUS 检测 CBD 扩张、CBD 结石、CBD SOL 和胰腺 SOL 的敏感性分别为 85%、91%、93%和 92%。TUS 检测 CBD 扩张、CBD 结石、CBD SOL 和胰腺 SOL 的敏感性分别为 42%、52%、40%和 37%。EUS 在诊断胰胆疾病方面比 TUS 更敏感。在诊断 CBD 扩张、胆总管结石、胆管微结石和胰胆肿瘤方面具有重要价值。在进行 ERCP 或手术等更具侵袭性的治疗方法之前,EUS 具有重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验