Department of Gastroenterology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of PostGraduate Medical Education & Research, 244, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, PIN 700020, India.
Department of Hepatology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of PostGraduate Medical Education & Research, 244, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, PIN 700020, India.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 12;24(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03406-5.
Biliary dilatation without obvious etiology on cross sectional imaging warrants further investigation. This study aimed to assess yield of endoscopic ultrasound in providing etiologic diagnosis in such situation.
Prospective cohort of consecutive patients with biliary dilatation & non diagnostic computed tomography (CT) and /or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with/without fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and were followed clinically, biochemically with/without radiology for up to six months. The findings of EUS were corroborated with histopathology of surgical specimens and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) findings in relevant cases.
Median age of 121 patients completing follow up was 55 years. 98.2% patients were symptomatic and median common bile duct (CBD) diameter was 13 mm. EUS was able to identify lesions attributable for biliary dilatation in (67 out of 121) 55.4% cases with ampullary neoplasm being the commonest (29 out of 67 i.e. 43%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified jaundice as the predictor of positive diagnosis on EUS, of finding ampullary lesion and pancreatic lesion on EUS. EUS had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of 95.65%, 94.23%, 95.65% and 95.04% respectively in providing etiologic diagnosis. Threshold value for baseline bilirubin of 10 mg%, for baseline CA 19.9 of 225 u/L and for largest CBD diameter of 16 mm were determined to have specificity of 98%, 95%, 92.5% respectively of finding a positive diagnosis on EUS.
EUS provides considerable diagnostic yield with high accuracy in biliary dilatation when cross sectional imaging fails to provide etiologic diagnosis.
在横断面上影像学检查无明显病因的胆道扩张需要进一步检查。本研究旨在评估超声内镜(EUS)在这种情况下提供病因诊断的效果。
连续前瞻性队列研究了患有胆道扩张且 CT 和/或 MRI 检查无诊断意义的患者,这些患者进行了 EUS 检查,同时进行了细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC),并进行了临床和生化随访,最长随访时间为 6 个月。EUS 结果与手术标本的组织病理学和相关病例中内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的结果相吻合。
完成随访的 121 例患者的中位年龄为 55 岁。98.2%的患者有症状,中位胆总管(CBD)直径为 13mm。EUS 能够在 67 例(121 例中有 55.4%)患者中发现与胆道扩张相关的病变,壶腹肿瘤是最常见的病变(29 例,即 43%)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,黄疸是 EUS 阳性诊断的预测因素,可发现壶腹和胰腺病变。EUS 在提供病因诊断方面的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和诊断准确性分别为 95.65%、94.23%、95.65%和 95.04%。胆红素基线值为 10mg%、CA 19.9 基线值为 225u/L 和 CBD 最大直径为 16mm 时,EUS 阳性诊断的特异性分别为 98%、95%和 92.5%。
当横断面成像不能提供病因诊断时,EUS 在胆道扩张中具有很高的准确性和诊断效果。