• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大流行今昔:新冠疫情期间采用的非药物干预措施的历史透视。

Pandemic Now and Then: A Historical Perspective of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions Adopted In Covid-19.

机构信息

Dr Manik Chandra Das, Coordinator, School of Public Health and Life Sciences, University of South Asia; E-mail:

出版信息

Mymensingh Med J. 2021 Apr;30(2):562-569.

PMID:33830144
Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), first reported in Wuhan, China is now a major global health threat - a pandemic. Public health control measures are the cornerstones in the fight against COVID-19 in the absence of an effective vaccine or proven treatment. The aim of this review was to explore the historical use case of various public health measures adopted today to tackle COVID-19 spread. Although our knowledge about this novel coronavirus transmission is evolving over time, the fundamental non-pharmaceutical interventions e.g., handwashing, wearing a mask, physical distancing, isolation, quarantine and border control which are adopted globally at present are not new. This review highlighted that historically and religiously similar approaches were practised in the medieval past for controlling disease outbreaks. The successful implementation of the public health control measures largely depends on health systems resilience, community engagement and changes in population behaviour. Combined global efforts are essential to strengthen health systems, improve the capability of research and transparent information sharing with both public and international bodies to combat the pandemic.

摘要

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)最初在中国武汉报告,现已成为全球主要的健康威胁——大流行。在缺乏有效疫苗或经证实的治疗方法的情况下,公共卫生控制措施是抗击 COVID-19 的基石。本综述旨在探讨目前用于应对 COVID-19 传播的各种公共卫生措施的历史应用案例。尽管我们对这种新型冠状病毒传播的了解随着时间的推移而不断发展,但目前在全球范围内采取的基本非药物干预措施,如洗手、戴口罩、保持身体距离、隔离、检疫和边境控制等并不新鲜。本综述强调,在过去的历史和宗教中,人们曾采取类似的方法来控制疾病的爆发。公共卫生控制措施的成功实施在很大程度上取决于卫生系统的弹性、社区参与以及人口行为的改变。全球共同努力对于加强卫生系统、提高研究能力以及与公共和国际机构透明地共享信息以抗击这一大流行病至关重要。

相似文献

1
Pandemic Now and Then: A Historical Perspective of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions Adopted In Covid-19.大流行今昔:新冠疫情期间采用的非药物干预措施的历史透视。
Mymensingh Med J. 2021 Apr;30(2):562-569.
2
[Reviewing and Reflecting on Nursing During the COVID-19 Pandemic].[新冠疫情期间护理工作的回顾与反思]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2020 Dec;67(6):4-5. doi: 10.6224/JN.202012_67(6).01.
3
The Coronavirus Pandemic: What Does the Evidence Show?新冠疫情:证据表明了什么?
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020 Apr 19;18(1):1-9. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v18i1.2596.
4
Efficacy of Mass Quarantine as Leverage of Health System Governance During COVID-19 Outbreak: A Mini Policy Review.隔离措施的功效:利用卫生系统治理在 COVID-19 疫情中发挥杠杆作用:小型政策回顾。
Arch Iran Med. 2020 Apr 1;23(4):265-267. doi: 10.34172/aim.2020.08.
5
Historical and methodological highlights of quarantine measures: from ancient plague epidemics to current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.检疫措施的历史与方法要点:从古代鼠疫流行到当前的冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行
Acta Biomed. 2020 May 11;91(2):226-229. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i2.9494.
6
Reverse quarantine and COVID-19.反向隔离与新冠病毒病
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):1323-1325. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.07.029. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
7
Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak.隔离、检疫、社交距离和社区管控:旧型公共卫生措施在新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)疫情中的关键作用。
J Travel Med. 2020 Mar 13;27(2). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa020.
8
COVID-19: A review of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions.新型冠状病毒肺炎:非药物干预措施有效性综述
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020 Oct-Dec;27(4):261-267. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_208_20.
9
Different Transmission Dynamics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Influenza Suggest the Relative Efficiency of Isolation/Quarantine and Social Distancing Against COVID-19 in China.不同的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)和流感的传播动力学表明,中国针对 COVID-19 的隔离/检疫和社会隔离措施具有相对效率。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e4305-e4311. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1584.
10
Assessment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Community Containment Strategies in Shenzhen, China.中国深圳 2019 年冠状病毒病社区防控策略评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e2012934. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12934.

引用本文的文献

1
Sanitary measures to contain COVID-19 spread decreased pediatric hospitalizations due to other respiratory infections in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗采取的卫生措施遏制了 COVID-19 的传播,从而降低了因其他呼吸道感染而住院的儿科患者数量。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022 Sep-Oct;98(5):533-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Feb 28.