Suppr超能文献

胰十二指肠切除术加肠系膜上动脉周围淋巴结清扫术治疗胰腺癌的实际意义:调整主要预后因素后对预后的比较。

Practical significance of pancreatectomy with lymphadenectomy around the superior mesenteric artery for pancreatic cancer: comparison of prognosis after adjusting for major prognostic factors.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.

Department of Public Health and Environmental Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 May;406(3):703-711. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02166-0. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although pancreatectomy with lymph node (LN) and nerve plexus dissection has usually been performed for pancreatic cancer, recent randomized controlled trials have questioned its survival benefits. However, superior mesenteric artery (SMA) LN dissection has still been included in standard treatment guidelines.

METHODS

A total of 94 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer without LN enlargement around the SMA on imaging were identified between 2008 and 2017. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and complications were compared between those with LN and hemicircumferential nerve plexus dissection around the SMA (SMA ly+) and those without thorough LN and nerve plexus dissection around the SMA (SMA ly-) after adjusting for major prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 78 and 16 patients with SMA ly+ and SMA ly- were identified, respectively. Our data demonstrated no difference in DFS and OS rates between both groups (P = 0.18 and 0.83, respectively). Patients with SMA ly+ had significantly more complications, particularly severe diarrhea, compared to those with SMA ly- (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LN and nerve plexus dissection around the SMA did not prolong survival and significantly increased the frequency of severe diarrhea, suggesting that performing in all cases carries less practical significance.

摘要

简介

尽管胰腺切除术伴淋巴结(LN)和神经丛解剖通常用于治疗胰腺癌,但最近的随机对照试验对其生存获益提出了质疑。然而,肠系膜上动脉(SMA)LN 解剖仍然被纳入标准治疗指南。

方法

在 2008 年至 2017 年间,共确定了 94 例在影像学上无 SMA 周围肿大 LN 的可切除胰腺癌患者接受胰十二指肠切除术。在调整主要预后因素后,比较 SMA 周围有 LN 和半环形神经丛解剖(SMA ly+)与无 SMA 周围彻底 LN 和神经丛解剖(SMA ly-)患者的无病生存率(DFS)、总生存率(OS)和并发症。

结果

共确定了 SMA ly+和 SMA ly-患者分别为 78 例和 16 例。我们的数据表明,两组患者的 DFS 和 OS 率无差异(P=0.18 和 0.83)。与 SMA ly-患者相比,SMA ly+患者的并发症发生率明显更高,尤其是严重腹泻(P=0.001)。

结论

SMA 周围的 LN 和神经丛解剖并未延长生存时间,并且显著增加了严重腹泻的频率,这表明在所有情况下进行手术的实际意义较小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验