• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不断发展的生物类似药临床需求:与行业专家和欧洲国家药品管理局监管机构的定性访谈研究。

Evolving Biosimilar Clinical Requirements: A Qualitative Interview Study with Industry Experts and European National Medicines Agency Regulators.

机构信息

Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science (CORS), Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.

Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BioDrugs. 2021 May;35(3):351-361. doi: 10.1007/s40259-021-00478-7. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1007/s40259-021-00478-7
PMID:33830478
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A biosimilar is a biological medicine highly similar to another already approved biological medicine (reference product). The availability of biosimilars promotes competition and subsequently lower prices. Changing the current biosimilar clinical comparability trial requirements may lead to lower biosimilar development costs that potentially could increase patients' access to biologics.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to determine the perceptions of industry and medicines agency regulators regarding the value, necessity, and future developments of the European biosimilar clinical comparability trial requirements for establishing biosimilarity.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight European national medicines agency regulators and 17 pharmaceutical company employees or consultants with experience in biologics between September 2018 and August 2019. Data were subjected to content analysis.

RESULTS

In general, the participants expected that clinical comparability trial requirements will continue to be reduced, in particular based on advancements in analytical testing and knowledge generated from prior biosimilar approvals. However, there are also competing issues at play, such as competition, physician's trust, and ethical considerations. Participants also reported that any new initiative to reduce or waive biosimilar clinical requirements needs to be scientifically sound and could potentially lower biosimilar development costs.

CONCLUSION

The main findings are that biosimilar clinical comparability trial requirements are likely to change in the near future. Clarity is needed on how to ensure adequate correlation between physicochemical data, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, and the drugs' performance in the clinic, as well as how to continue sufficient immunogenicity assessment. Obtaining this clarity can facilitate regulatory assessment of the next biosimilars.

摘要

背景

生物类似药是与已批准的生物药(参照药)高度相似的生物药。生物类似药的出现促进了竞争,进而降低了价格。改变当前生物类似药临床可比性试验的要求可能会降低生物类似药的开发成本,从而增加患者获得生物药的机会。

目的

旨在确定业界和药品管理局监管机构对建立生物类似药相似性的欧洲生物类似药临床可比性试验要求的价值、必要性和未来发展的看法。

方法

2018 年 9 月至 2019 年 8 月,对 8 名欧洲国家药品管理局监管机构和 17 名具有生物制品经验的制药公司员工或顾问进行了半结构化访谈。对数据进行了内容分析。

结果

总体而言,参与者预计临床可比性试验要求将继续降低,特别是基于分析测试的进步和从先前生物类似药批准中获得的知识。然而,也存在竞争问题,如竞争、医生的信任和伦理考虑。参与者还报告说,任何降低或豁免生物类似药临床要求的新举措都需要有科学依据,并可能降低生物类似药的开发成本。

结论

主要发现是生物类似药临床可比性试验要求在不久的将来可能会发生变化。需要明确如何确保理化数据、药代动力学/药效学研究以及药物在临床中的表现之间有足够的相关性,以及如何继续进行充分的免疫原性评估。明确这一点可以促进对下一批生物类似药的监管评估。

相似文献

1
Evolving Biosimilar Clinical Requirements: A Qualitative Interview Study with Industry Experts and European National Medicines Agency Regulators.不断发展的生物类似药临床需求:与行业专家和欧洲国家药品管理局监管机构的定性访谈研究。
BioDrugs. 2021 May;35(3):351-361. doi: 10.1007/s40259-021-00478-7. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
Evolution of the EU Biosimilar Framework: Past and Future.欧盟生物类似药框架的演变:过去与未来。
BioDrugs. 2019 Dec;33(6):621-634. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00377-y.
3
Interchangeability of biosimilars: A study of expert views and visions regarding the science and substitution.生物类似药的可互换性:一项关于科学和替代的专家观点和愿景的研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262537. eCollection 2022.
4
Ten years of biosimilars in Europe: development and evolution of the regulatory pathways.欧洲生物类似药十年:监管途径的发展与演变
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 May 16;11:1509-1515. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S130318. eCollection 2017.
5
Development of biosimilars.生物类似药的研发
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Apr;45(5 Suppl):S11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
Understanding Biosimilar Insulins - Development, Manufacturing, and Clinical Trials.了解生物类似胰岛素——研发、生产和临床试验。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1649-1661. doi: 10.1177/19322968221105864. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Developing clinical trials for biosimilars.开发生物类似药的临床试验。
Semin Oncol. 2014 Feb;41 Suppl 1:S15-25. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
8
Do the Outcomes of Clinical Efficacy Trials Matter in Regulatory Decision-Making for Biosimilars?生物类似药监管决策中临床疗效试验结果是否重要?
BioDrugs. 2023 Nov;37(6):855-871. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00631-4. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
9
Comparability and biosimilarity: considerations for the healthcare provider.可比性和生物相似性:医疗保健提供者的考虑因素。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jun;28(6):1053-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.686902. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
10
The US approach to biosimilars: the long-awaited FDA approval pathway.美国的生物类似药途径:期待已久的 FDA 批准途径。
BioDrugs. 2012 Dec 1;26(6):357-61. doi: 10.2165/11635830-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Uptake of biosimilars in China: a retrospective analysis of the case of trastuzumab from 2018 to 2023.生物类似药在中国的应用:2018 年至 2023 年曲妥珠单抗案例的回顾性分析。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 Oct 5;9(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00372-z.
2
Biosimilars in the Era of Artificial Intelligence-International Regulations and the Use in Oncological Treatments.人工智能时代的生物类似药——国际法规及在肿瘤治疗中的应用
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;17(7):925. doi: 10.3390/ph17070925.
3
Barriers and Enablers Affecting the Uptake of Biosimilar Medicines Viewed Through the Lens of Actor Network Theory: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
A qualitative study of biosimilar manufacturer and regulator perceptions on intellectual property and abbreviated approval pathways.一项关于生物类似药制造商和监管机构对知识产权及简化审批途径看法的定性研究。
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Nov;38(11):1253-1256. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0717-7.
2
Physicians' perceptions of the uptake of biosimilars: a systematic review.医生对生物类似药采用情况的看法:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 5;10(5):e034183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034183.
3
The Path Towards a Tailored Clinical Biosimilar Development.迈向定制化临床生物类似药开发之路。
通过 Actor Network 理论视角观察影响生物类似药采用的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BioDrugs. 2024 Jul;38(4):541-555. doi: 10.1007/s40259-024-00659-0. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
4
Patients' Perceptions of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review.患者对生物类似药的认知:一项系统评价
BioDrugs. 2023 Nov;37(6):829-841. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00620-7. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
BioDrugs. 2020 Jun;34(3):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00422-1.
4
Clinical evidence supporting the marketing authorization of biosimilars in Europe.支持生物类似药在欧洲获得营销授权的临床证据。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Apr;76(4):557-566. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02805-y. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
5
An Efficient Development Paradigm for Biosimilars.生物类似药的高效开发模式。
BioDrugs. 2019 Dec;33(6):603-611. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00371-4.
6
When Is a Medicine Good Enough?: Science, Similarity, and the History of Generic Drugs.一种药物何时才算足够好?:科学、相似性与仿制药的历史
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Feb;105(2):290-291. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1316.
7
Academic oncology clinicians' understanding of biosimilars and information needed before prescribing.肿瘤学临床医生对生物类似药的理解以及处方前所需信息。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 Jan 6;11:1758835918818335. doi: 10.1177/1758835918818335. eCollection 2019.
8
Factors Affecting Health Care Provider Knowledge and Acceptance of Biosimilar Medicines: A Systematic Review.影响医疗保健提供者对生物类似药认知和接受度的因素:系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):102-112. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.1.102.
9
Differences in UK healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitude and practice towards infliximab and insulin glargine biosimilars.英国医疗保健专业人员对英夫利昔单抗和甘精胰岛素生物类似药的知识、态度及实践差异。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr;27(2):214-217. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12485. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
10
The End of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Biosimilars Development?生物类似药研发的 3 期临床试验是否已终结?
BioDrugs. 2018 Aug;32(4):319-324. doi: 10.1007/s40259-018-0287-0.