影响医疗保健提供者对生物类似药认知和接受度的因素:系统评价。

Factors Affecting Health Care Provider Knowledge and Acceptance of Biosimilar Medicines: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

1 Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

2 Pharmacy Services, Generics, Biosimilars, Premier, Charlotte, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):102-112. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.1.102.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Newly developed biosimilar agents confer significant cost-saving advantages, yielding the potential to mitigate rising drug costs and expand patient access to care for important biologic therapies. Biosimilar market uptake greatly depends on health care provider willingness to promote, prescribe, and use biosimilars in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review evaluating current U.S. and European health care provider knowledge, perceptions, and prescribing behaviors of biosimilar medicines to assess the need for clinician-directed biosimilar education.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted using journal databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Terms related to biosimilar agents, survey questionnaires, and education were used. Two independent reviewers evaluated 158 citations published from January 1, 2014, to March 5, 2018 that were the result of this search. Studies in English were included if they surveyed U.S. or European physician and/or pharmacist knowledge, attitudes, and/or prescribing preferences of biosimilar drugs. Overall trends in prescribing behavior and perceptions were abstracted.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies met inclusion criteria. Three studies originated from the United States and 17 were from Europe. Hospital specialists, gastroenterologists, and rheumatologists were the most frequently surveyed practitioners. The percentage of biosimilar prescribing varied widely between countries and within similar practice fields. If used, biosimilars were predominantly prescribed in biologic treatment-naive patients. An overall lack of biosimilar familiarity in U.S. and European health care settings accompanied concerns about biosimilar safety, efficacy, extrapolation, and interchangeability. Detailed descriptions of biosimilar education programs were lacking within the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this review indicate that U.S. and European health care providers still approach biosimilar medicines with caution, citing limited biosimilar knowledge, low prescribing comfort, and safety and efficacy concerns as main deterrents for biosimilar use. To realize the full cost-saving potential of biosimilar medicines, clinician-directed biosimilar education will be imperative to address gaps in biosimilar knowledge, facilitate prescribing changes, and ultimately increase biosimilar use.

DISCLOSURES

No outside funding supported this study. The authors have nothing to disclose.

摘要

背景

新开发的生物类似药具有显著的成本节约优势,有可能降低药物成本,并扩大患者获得重要生物治疗的机会。生物类似药市场的采用在很大程度上取决于医疗保健提供者是否愿意在临床实践中推广、开处和使用生物类似药。

目的

进行系统评价,评估当前美国和欧洲医疗保健提供者对生物类似药的知识、看法和处方行为,以评估是否需要开展以临床医生为导向的生物类似药教育。

方法

使用期刊数据库(包括 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library)进行电子文献检索,检索与生物类似物制剂、调查问卷和教育相关的术语。两名独立的审查员评估了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 3 月 5 日期间,该检索结果发表的 158 篇引文。如果调查了美国或欧洲医生和/或药剂师对生物类似药物的知识、态度和/或处方偏好的英语研究,则将其纳入研究。摘要了处方行为和认知的总体趋势。

结果

共有 20 项研究符合纳入标准。其中 3 项研究来自美国,17 项研究来自欧洲。医院专科医生、胃肠病学家和风湿病学家是接受调查最多的从业者。各国之间以及类似实践领域内的生物类似药处方率差异很大。如果使用,生物类似药主要用于生物治疗初治患者。美国和欧洲医疗保健环境中普遍缺乏对生物类似药的熟悉程度,同时对生物类似药的安全性、疗效、外推和可互换性表示担忧。文献中缺乏对生物类似药教育计划的详细描述。

结论

本研究结果表明,美国和欧洲的医疗保健提供者在使用生物类似药时仍然持谨慎态度,主要原因是对生物类似药的了解有限、处方舒适度低,以及对安全性和疗效的担忧。为了实现生物类似药的全部成本节约潜力,以临床医生为导向的生物类似药教育对于解决生物类似药知识方面的差距、促进处方改变以及最终增加生物类似药的使用至关重要。

披露

本研究无外部资金支持。作者没有要披露的内容。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索