Suppr超能文献

复杂型创伤后应激障碍是否可以预测或调节三种暴露疗法变体的治疗效果?

Does complex PTSD predict or moderate treatment outcomes of three variants of exposure therapy?

机构信息

Leiden University, Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden, the Netherlands; Parnassiagroep, PsyQ The Hague, the Netherlands.

Leiden University, Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2021 May;80:102388. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102388. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One reason for the inclusion of Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) was its suspected relevance for treatment indications. We investigated whether CPTSD predicted and moderated treatment outcomes of Prolonged Exposure (PE), intensified PE (iPE) and Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation followed by PE (STAIR + PE). We expected that CPTSD would predict worse treatment outcomes across treatments. Secondly, we expected that CPTSD would lead to better treatment effect in STAIR + PE compared to PE and iPE.

METHODS

We analyzed 149 patients with childhood-abuse related PTSD from a randomized clinical trial. CPTSD diagnosis and symptom severity were measured with the International Trauma Questionnaire. The main outcome was change in clinician-assessed PTSD symptoms. Assessments took place at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16 (post-treatment) and at a 6-and 12-month follow-up. Analyses were based on an intention-to-treat sample using mixed effect models.

RESULTS

More than half (54 %) of the patients met criteria for CPTSD at baseline. CPTSD was related to more severe PTSD symptoms and higher comorbidity at baseline. CPTSD neither predicted nor moderated treatment outcome.

LIMITATIONS

Inclusion was limited to patients with PTSD related to childhood abuse. Replication is needed in different samples.

CONCLUSIONS

CPTSD is associated with more severe PTSD and with higher comorbidity. CPTSD did not predict treatment outcome and did not indicate differential treatment outcome of STAIR + PE compared to PE and iPE.

摘要

背景

将复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)纳入国际疾病分类第 11 次修订版(ICD-11)的一个原因是其疑似与治疗指征有关。我们研究了 CPTSD 是否预测和调节了延长暴露(PE)、强化 PE(iPE)和情感与人际调节后 PE(STAIR+PE)的治疗结果。我们预计 CPTSD 将预测所有治疗方法的治疗结果较差。其次,我们预计 CPTSD 将导致 STAIR+PE 比 PE 和 iPE 具有更好的治疗效果。

方法

我们分析了一项随机临床试验中 149 名与儿童期虐待相关 PTSD 的患者。CPTSD 诊断和症状严重程度采用国际创伤问卷进行测量。主要结果是临床医生评估的 PTSD 症状变化。评估在基线、第 4 周、第 8 周、第 16 周(治疗后)和 6 个月和 12 个月随访时进行。分析基于意向治疗样本,采用混合效应模型。

结果

超过一半(54%)的患者在基线时符合 CPTSD 的标准。CPTSD 与基线时更严重的 PTSD 症状和更高的共病率有关。CPTSD 既不能预测也不能调节治疗结果。

局限性

纳入仅限于 PTSD 与儿童期虐待有关的患者。需要在不同的样本中进行复制。

结论

CPTSD 与更严重的 PTSD 和更高的共病率有关。CPTSD 既不能预测治疗结果,也不能表明 STAIR+PE 与 PE 和 iPE 的治疗效果有差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验