Stefani Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, University of Saint Mary, 4100 South 4th St, Leavenworth, KS, 66048, USA.
Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Dr. Pallavi Patel College of Healthcare Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, 3200 South University, Dr. Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 33328, USA.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Jun;53:102366. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102366. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
Dry needling (DN) has been consistently shown to decrease pain sensitivity and increase flexibility local to the site of treatment, however it is unclear whether these effects are limited to the region of treatment or can be observed remote to the area of treatment.
To determine the immediate, short-term effects of DN to the thoracolumbar junction on regional and remote flexibility, and to observe if changes in pain sensitivity can occur remote to site of treatment.
Double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Fifty-four subjects with low back pain and decreased length in at least one hamstring were randomized to receive either DN or sham DN to the T12 and L1 multifidi. Participants underwent regional (fingertip-to-floor) and remote flexibility (passive knee extension, passive straight leg raise) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) testing of the upper and lower extremity before, immediately after and 1 day after treatment. ANCOVAs were used to analyze flexibility data, with the covariate of pre-treatment values. Paired t-tests were used for difference in remote pain sensitivity.
Statistically larger improvements in regional flexibility, but not remote flexibility, were observed immediately post-treatment in those who received DN than in those receiving sham DN (p = .0495; adjusted difference 1.2, 95% CI 0.002-2.3). Differences between upper and lower extremity PPT were not significant.
DN can potentially have immediate changes in regional flexibility, but effects are not sustained at 24-h follow-up. DN may not affect remote flexibility or segmental pain sensitivity.
干针疗法(DN)已被证实能降低治疗部位的疼痛敏感度并增加其局部灵活性,但尚不清楚这些效果是否仅限于治疗区域,还是可以观察到治疗区域以外的区域。
确定胸椎和腰椎交界处的 DN 即刻和短期对局部和远处灵活性的影响,并观察疼痛敏感度的变化是否可以在治疗部位以外的区域发生。
双盲随机临床试验。
54 名患有下腰痛和至少一条腿筋缩短的患者被随机分为接受 DN 或假 DN 治疗 T12 和 L1 多裂肌。参与者在治疗前、治疗后即刻和治疗后 1 天接受了局部(指尖到地面)和远程灵活性(被动膝关节伸展、被动直腿抬高)以及上肢和下肢的压力疼痛阈值(PPT)测试。使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)分析灵活性数据,以治疗前值为协变量。采用配对 t 检验分析远程疼痛敏感度的差异。
在接受 DN 的患者中,治疗后即刻观察到局部灵活性的统计学上更大的改善,但在接受假 DN 的患者中则没有(p=0.0495;调整后的差异为 1.2,95%置信区间为 0.002-2.3)。上肢和下肢 PPT 之间的差异不显著。
DN 可能会立即对局部灵活性产生变化,但在 24 小时随访时效果不会持续。DN 可能不会影响远程灵活性或节段性疼痛敏感度。