• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

唾液、口咽和鼻咽标本中的 SARS-CoV-2。

SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal specimens.

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2021 Apr 7;68(5):A01210087.

PMID:33832565
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The reference test to evaluate patients with suspected respiratory virus infection is a real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS). However, other specimen collection methods such as an oropharyngeal swab (OPS) or saliva specimen are also used for SARS-CoV-2 testing during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. However, it remains unclear if rates of SARS-CoV-2 detection differ between sampling methods. This study will compare the rates of SARS-CoV-2 detection by saliva, OPS, and NPS sampling in a public setting.

METHODS

Individuals referred for outpatient SARS-CoV-2 testing will be invited to participate in a prospective clinical study. They will have saliva, OPS and NPS specimens collected that will be analysed separately for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-PCR. The rate of SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva, OPS and NPS will be compared using a logistic regression mixed-effect model analysis. A sample of 19,110 participants is required at an expected 1.5% test-positive rate in order to detect a 25.6% difference. The total sample size will be adjusted as the test-positive rate changes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will provide evidence for the optimal site of specimen collection to detect SARS-CoV-2. The results may help guide the health authorities.

FUNDING

This is an investigator-initiated trial based on an unrestricted grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation and the Aage og Johanne Louis-Hansens Fond. The foundations have had no say in the decisions on study design or reporting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04715607).

摘要

简介

评估疑似呼吸道病毒感染患者的参考检测方法是对鼻咽拭子(NPS)进行实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)。然而,在当前的 COVID-19 大流行期间,也使用其他标本采集方法,如口咽拭子(OPS)或唾液标本,用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测。然而,目前尚不清楚不同采样方法检测 SARS-CoV-2 的检出率是否存在差异。本研究将比较唾液、OPS 和 NPS 采样方法在公共场所检测 SARS-CoV-2 的检出率。

方法

将邀请因门诊 SARS-CoV-2 检测而转介的个体参加一项前瞻性临床研究。将采集唾液、OPS 和 NPS 标本,分别通过 RT-PCR 分析 SARS-CoV-2 RNA。使用逻辑回归混合效应模型分析比较唾液、OPS 和 NPS 中 SARS-CoV-2 的检出率。预计检测阳性率为 1.5%,需要 19,110 名参与者的样本,以检测出 25.6%的差异。总样本量将根据检测阳性率的变化进行调整。

结论

本研究将为检测 SARS-CoV-2 提供最佳标本采集部位的证据。研究结果可能有助于指导卫生当局。

资金来源

这是一项基于诺和诺德基金会和 Aage og Johanne Louis-Hansens 基金会的一项不受限制赠款的研究者发起的试验。这两个基金会对研究设计或报告的决策没有发言权。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov(编号:NCT04715607)。

相似文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal specimens.唾液、口咽和鼻咽标本中的 SARS-CoV-2。
Dan Med J. 2021 Apr 7;68(5):A01210087.
2
Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal wash specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the setting of sampling device shortage.采样设备短缺时,鼻咽、口咽和鼻洗液标本检测 SARS-CoV-2 的敏感性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;40(2):441-445. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04039-8. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
3
Are Posterior Oropharyngeal Saliva Specimens an Acceptable Alternative to Nasopharyngeal Sampling for the Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in Primary-Care Settings?在后口咽唾液标本是否可作为基层医疗机构监测 SARS-CoV-2 的鼻咽采样替代方法?
Viruses. 2021 Apr 26;13(5):761. doi: 10.3390/v13050761.
4
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.临床环境中,自我采集唾液与鼻咽拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的诊断性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
5
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Saliva as Compared to Nasopharyngeal Swabs in Outpatients.从唾液中检测 SARS-CoV-2 与门诊鼻咽拭子比较。
Viruses. 2020 Nov 17;12(11):1314. doi: 10.3390/v12111314.
6
Saliva as a testing specimen with or without pooling for SARS-CoV-2 detection by multiplex RT-PCR test.使用或不使用混合 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的唾液作为检测样本。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 23;16(2):e0243183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243183. eCollection 2021.
7
A Multiplex One-Step RT-qPCR Protocol to Detect SARS-CoV-2 in NP/OP Swabs and Saliva.一种用于检测 NP/OP 拭子和唾液中 SARS-CoV-2 的多重一步法 RT-qPCR 方案。
Curr Protoc. 2021 May;1(5):e145. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.145.
8
Validation of saliva sampling as an alternative to oro-nasopharyngeal swab for detection of SARS-CoV-2 using unextracted rRT-PCR with the Allplex 2019-nCoV assay.采用未提取的实时 RT-PCR 联合 Allplex 2019-nCoV 检测试剂盒,验证唾液采样作为替代口咽拭子用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 的方法。
J Med Microbiol. 2021 Aug;70(8). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001404.
9
Adding saliva testing to oropharyngeal and deep nasal swab testing increases PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in primary care and children.在口咽和深部鼻拭子检测中增加唾液检测可提高基层医疗和儿童中SARS-CoV-2的PCR检测率。
Med J Aust. 2021 Sep 20;215(6):273-278. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51188. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
10
Development and Evaluation of AccuPower COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Sputum, NPS/OPS, Saliva and Pooled Samples.AccuPower COVID-19 多重实时 RT-PCR 试剂盒和 AccuPower SARS-CoV-2 多重实时 RT-PCR 试剂盒的开发和评估,用于痰液、鼻咽拭子/口咽拭子、唾液和混合样本中 SARS-CoV-2 的检测。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 10;17(2):e0263341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263341. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Higher SARS-CoV-2 detection of oropharyngeal compared with nasopharyngeal or saliva specimen for molecular testing: a multicentre randomised comparative accuracy study.与鼻咽或唾液标本相比,口咽标本更能提高 SARS-CoV-2 的分子检测检出率:一项多中心随机比较准确性研究。
Thorax. 2023 Oct;78(10):1028-1034. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219599. Epub 2023 May 19.
2
A review of current effective COVID-19 testing methods and quality control.当前有效 COVID-19 检测方法及质量控制综述。
Arch Microbiol. 2023 May 17;205(6):239. doi: 10.1007/s00203-023-03579-9.
3
Optimization and Improvement of qPCR Detection Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 in Saliva.
优化和提高唾液中 SARS-CoV-2 的 qPCR 检测灵敏度。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0464022. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04640-22. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
4
Performance & clinical utility of oropharyngeal versus nasopharyngeal swabs in COVID-19.口咽拭子与鼻咽拭子在 COVID-19 中的性能和临床应用。
Indian J Med Res. 2022 Sep;156(3):478-483. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2275_21.
5
Clinical evaluation of nasopharyngeal, midturbinate nasal and oropharyngeal swabs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.鼻咽、中鼻甲和口咽拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的临床评估。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;102(4):115618. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115618. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
6
Valid and Reliable Assessment of Upper Respiratory Tract Specimen Collection Skills during the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间上呼吸道标本采集技能的有效且可靠评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Oct 26;11(11):1987. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11111987.
7
Risk Factors for Being Seronegative following SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Large Cohort of Health Care Workers in Denmark.丹麦大型医护人员队列中 SARS-CoV-2 感染后血清阴性的危险因素。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0090421. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00904-21. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
Is oropharyngeal sampling a reliable test to detect SARS-CoV-2?口咽采样是检测新型冠状病毒的可靠测试吗?
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;21(10):1348. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00395-9. Epub 2021 Aug 4.