Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Biomedical Translation Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0464022. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04640-22. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been a major public health threat globally, especially during the beginning of the pandemic in 2020. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is utilized for viral RNA detection as part of control measures to limit the spread of COVID-19. Collecting nasopharyngeal swabs for RT-qPCR is a routine diagnostic method for COVID-19 in clinical settings, but its large-scale implementation is hindered by a shortage of trained health professionals. Despite concerns over its sensitivity, saliva has been suggested as a practical alternative sampling approach to the nasopharyngeal swab for viral RNA detection. In this study, we spiked saliva from healthy donors with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 from an international standard to evaluate the effect of saliva on viral RNA detection. On average, the saliva increased the cycle threshold () values of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA samples by 2.64 compared to the viral RNA in viral transport medium. Despite substantial variation among different donors in the effect of saliva on RNA quantification, the outcome of the RT-qPCR diagnosis was largely unaffected for viral RNA samples with values of <35 (1.55 log IU/mL). The saliva-treated viral RNA remained stable for up to 6 h at room temperature and 24 h at 4°C. Further supplementing protease and RNase inhibitors improved the detection of viral RNA in the saliva samples. Our data provide practical information on the storage conditions of saliva samples and suggest optimized sampling procedures for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The primary method for detection of SARS-CoV-2 is using nasopharyngeal swabs, but a shortage of trained health professionals has hindered its large-scale implementation. Saliva-based nucleic acid detection is a widely adopted alternative, due to its convenience and minimally invasive nature, but the detection limit and direct impact of saliva on viral RNA remain poorly understood. To address this gap in knowledge, we used a WHO international standard to evaluate the effect of saliva on SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection. We describe the detection profile of saliva-treated SARS-CoV-2 samples under different storage temperatures and incubation periods. We also found that adding protease and RNase inhibitors could improve viral RNA detection in saliva. Our research provides practical recommendations for the optimal storage conditions and sampling procedures for saliva-based testing, which can improve the efficiency of COVID-19 testing and enhance public health responses to the pandemic.
新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)由严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)引起,是全球主要的公共卫生威胁,尤其是在 2020 年大流行开始时。逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)用于病毒 RNA 的检测,作为控制措施的一部分,以限制 COVID-19 的传播。采集鼻咽拭子进行 RT-qPCR 是临床环境中 COVID-19 的常规诊断方法,但由于缺乏经过培训的卫生专业人员,其大规模实施受到阻碍。尽管人们对其灵敏度存在担忧,但唾液已被建议作为替代鼻咽拭子进行病毒 RNA 检测的实用方法。在这项研究中,我们用国际标准的灭活 SARS-CoV-2 对来自健康供体的唾液进行了加标,以评估唾液对病毒 RNA 检测的影响。平均而言,与病毒转运培养基中的病毒 RNA 相比,唾液使 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 样本的循环阈值(Cq)值增加了 2.64。尽管不同供体之间唾液对 RNA 定量的影响存在很大差异,但对于 Cq 值<35(1.55 log IU/mL)的病毒 RNA 样本,RT-qPCR 诊断的结果基本不受影响。唾液处理的病毒 RNA 在室温下可稳定保存长达 6 小时,在 4°C 下可稳定保存 24 小时。进一步补充蛋白酶和核糖核酸酶抑制剂可提高唾液样本中病毒 RNA 的检测。我们的数据提供了有关唾液样本储存条件的实用信息,并为 SARS-CoV-2 诊断提出了优化的采样程序。SARS-CoV-2 的主要检测方法是使用鼻咽拭子,但由于缺乏经过培训的卫生专业人员,其大规模实施受到阻碍。基于唾液的核酸检测是一种广泛采用的替代方法,因为它具有方便和微创的特点,但唾液对病毒 RNA 的检测限和直接影响仍知之甚少。为了弥补这一知识空白,我们使用世界卫生组织(WHO)国际标准来评估唾液对 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 检测的影响。我们描述了在不同储存温度和孵育时间下唾液处理的 SARS-CoV-2 样本的检测情况。我们还发现,添加蛋白酶和核糖核酸酶抑制剂可以提高唾液中病毒 RNA 的检测。我们的研究为基于唾液的检测提供了最佳储存条件和采样程序的实用建议,这可以提高 COVID-19 检测的效率,并增强对大流行的公共卫生应对。