California Center for Population Research and Department of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Demography. 2021 Apr 1;58(2):773-784. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9000711.
We revisit a novel causal model published in Demography by Hicks et al. (2018), designed to assess whether exposure to neighborhood disadvantage over time affects children's reading and math skills. Here, we provide corrected and new results. Reconsideration of the model in the original article raised concerns about bias due to exposure-induced confounding (i.e., past exposures directly affecting future exposures) and true state dependence (i.e., past exposures affecting confounders of future exposures). Through simulation, we show that our originally proposed propensity function approach displays modest bias due to exposure-induced confounding but no bias from true state dependence. We suggest a correction based on residualized values and show that this new approach corrects for the observed bias. We contrast this revised method with other causal modeling approaches using simulation. Finally, we reproduce the substantive models from Hicks et al. (2018) using the new residuals-based adjustment procedure. With the correction, our findings are essentially identical to those reported originally. We end with some conclusions regarding approaches to causal modeling.
我们重新审视了希克斯等人(2018 年)在《人口统计学》杂志上发表的一种新的因果模型,该模型旨在评估随着时间的推移,接触邻里劣势是否会影响儿童的阅读和数学技能。在这里,我们提供了修正和新的结果。对原文中模型的重新考虑引起了对暴露引起的混杂(即过去的暴露直接影响未来的暴露)和真正的状态依赖性(即过去的暴露影响未来暴露的混杂因素)的偏差的担忧。通过模拟,我们表明,我们最初提出的倾向函数方法由于暴露引起的混杂而存在适度的偏差,但不存在真正的状态依赖性偏差。我们建议基于残差的值进行修正,并表明这种新方法可以纠正观察到的偏差。我们使用模拟比较了这种修正方法与其他因果建模方法。最后,我们使用新的基于残差的调整程序再现了希克斯等人(2018 年)的实质性模型。经过修正,我们的发现与最初报告的结果基本一致。最后,我们得出了一些关于因果建模方法的结论。