• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Motivational Interviewing: An Evidence-Based Approach for Use in Medical Practice.动机性访谈:一种在医学实践中应用的循证方法。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Feb 19;118(7):109-115. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0014.
2
Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.医疗环境中的动机性访谈:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):157-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Motivational interviewing to enhance treatment attendance in mental health settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.动机性访谈以提高精神卫生机构的治疗依从性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Nov;24(9-10):699-718. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12420. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
Motivational interviewing: a novel intervention for translating rehabilitation research into practice.动机性访谈:一种将康复研究转化为实践的新干预措施。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jun;35(11):919-23. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.711897. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
5
Beyond face-to-face individual counseling: A systematic review on alternative modes of motivational interviewing in substance abuse treatment and prevention.超越面对面个体咨询:关于物质滥用治疗与预防中动机性访谈替代模式的系统评价
Addict Behav. 2017 Oct;73:216-235. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
Psychological and psychosocial interventions for cannabis cessation in adults: a systematic review short report.成人大麻戒断的心理和社会心理干预:系统评价简短报告
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(56):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta19560.
7
Effectiveness of motivational interviewing interventions on medication adherence in adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.动机性访谈干预对慢性病成人药物依从性的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):589-602. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw273.
8
Motivational interviewing in improving oral health: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.动机性访谈对改善口腔健康的作用:随机对照试验的系统评价
J Periodontol. 2014 Mar;85(3):426-37. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130205. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
9
A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a motivational interviewing-based intervention for weight loss maintenance in adults.一项针对成年人减肥维持的基于动机性访谈干预的可行性随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(50):v-vi, xix-xxv, 1-378. doi: 10.3310/hta19500.
10
Motivational Interviewing for Parent-child Health Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于亲子健康干预的动机性访谈:系统评价与荟萃分析
Pediatr Dent. 2015 May-Jun;37(3):254-65.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptance and commitment therapy applied to early psychosis: Therapeutic foundations and a narrative systematic review.接纳与承诺疗法应用于早期精神病:治疗基础及叙述性系统综述。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):107313. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.107313.
2
Multifaceted health coaching intervention for cardiovascular risk prevention - exploratory qualitative study of Chinese clients' perspectives.心血管风险预防的多方面健康指导干预——中国客户观点的探索性定性研究
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Aug 4;26(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02957-0.
3
[Physical activity in psychiatry: a practical guide for clinicians on patient communication about physical activity, exercise, and sport].[精神病学中的体育活动:临床医生就体育活动、锻炼和运动与患者沟通的实用指南]
Neuropsychiatr. 2025 Sep;39(3):133-143. doi: 10.1007/s40211-025-00535-5. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
4
"It is not a disease like cancer, we can live well with diabetes" - A qualitative study exploring positive experiences of diabetic patients.“这不是像癌症那样的疾病,我们可以带着糖尿病好好生活”——一项探索糖尿病患者积极体验的定性研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jun;14(6):2251-2257. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1636_24. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
5
Comparative efficacy of psychological interventions for internet gaming disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.网络成瘾障碍心理干预的比较疗效:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 10;16:1619138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1619138. eCollection 2025.
6
Medication Adherence and Perceptions According to the Presence or Absence of a Migration Background in a Dialysis Unit (DIANA Qualitative Study).透析单元中根据是否有移民背景划分的药物依从性及认知情况(DIANA定性研究)
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jul 18;19:2107-2118. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S503025. eCollection 2025.
7
GPs' experienced challenges and strategies for supporting patient self-management in disease management programs for type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease - a qualitative study.全科医生在2型糖尿病和冠心病疾病管理项目中支持患者自我管理所面临的挑战及策略——一项定性研究
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 12;26(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02896-w.
8
Barriers and Facilitators to PrEP Adherence among Transgender and Non-binary Individuals: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Psychosocial Factors and Health Belief Model Constructs.跨性别者和非二元性别者中暴露前预防依从性的障碍与促进因素:心理社会因素和健康信念模型构建的混合方法分析
AIDS Behav. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04810-y.
9
Grouping motivational interviewing for alcohol craving in individuals with alcohol use disorder: the influence of drinking history on its efficacy.针对酒精使用障碍个体的酒精渴望进行分组动机访谈:饮酒史对其疗效的影响。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02054-4.
10
Sports Preparticipation Evaluation for Healthy Adults: A Consensus-Based German Guideline.健康成年人运动参与前评估:基于共识的德国指南
Sports Med. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02230-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Meaningful shared decision-making: complex process demanding cognitive and emotional skills.有意义的共同决策:需要认知和情感技能的复杂过程。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):431-438. doi: 10.1111/jep.13349. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
2
Medication adherence among patients with chronic diseases: a survey-based study in pharmacies.慢性病患者的药物依从性:基于药店的调查研究。
QJM. 2019 Jul 1;112(7):505-512. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcz058.
3
Mechanisms of behavior change in motivational interviewing: do we understand how MI works?动机性访谈中行为改变的机制:我们是否了解 MI 是如何起作用的?
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Dec;30:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
4
Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、地区和国家残疾调整生命年(DALYs)359 种疾病和伤害以及 195 个国家和地区 1990-2017 年的健康期望寿命(HALE):2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1859-1922. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32335-3.
5
Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on adult behaviour change in health and social care settings: A systematic review of reviews.动机性访谈在健康和社会保健环境中对成人行为改变的效果:系统综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0204890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204890. eCollection 2018.
6
Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: A review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness.激励式访谈、增强型干预和简短干预在过去十年中的效果和效率:综述评论。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Dec;31(8):862-887. doi: 10.1037/adb0000318.
7
Medication adherence among patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis.明显治疗抵抗性高血压患者的药物依从性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2017 Dec;35(12):2346-2357. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001502.
8
Effectiveness of motivational interviewing interventions on medication adherence in adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.动机性访谈干预对慢性病成人药物依从性的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):589-602. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw273.
9
Understanding Psychological Reactance: New Developments and Findings.理解心理抗拒:新进展与新发现
Z Psychol. 2015;223(4):205-214. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000222.
10
Motivational Interviewing Improves Medication Adherence: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.动机性访谈可提高药物依从性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):929-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3685-3. Epub 2016 May 9.

动机性访谈:一种在医学实践中应用的循证方法。

Motivational Interviewing: An Evidence-Based Approach for Use in Medical Practice.

机构信息

Lübeck University, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Lübeck.

出版信息

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Feb 19;118(7):109-115. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0014.

DOI:10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0014
PMID:33835006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8200683/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Motivational factors in health-relevant modes of behavior are an important matter in medical practice. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a technique that has been specifically developed to help motivate ambivalent patients to change their behav - ior.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Special attention was paid to systematic reviews and meta-analyses concerning the efficacy of MI in the medical care of various target groups. The present review focuses on the relevance of MI for patients with highly prevalent disorders.

RESULTS

Meta-analyses reveal statistically significant mean intervention effects of MI in medical care with respect to a variety of health-relevant modes of behavior, in comparison to standard treatment and no treatment in the control groups (odds ratio [OR]: 1.55; 95% confidence interval: [1.40; 1.71]). Statistically significant effect sizes were reported for substance consumption, physical activity, dental hygiene, body weight, treatment adherence, willingness to change behavior, and mortality; effects on healthpromoting behavior were mixed. Studies of the factors that contribute to the efficacy of MI suggest that it exerts its effects largely through the selective reinforcement of statements made by the patients themselves about potential changes in their behavior.

CONCLUSION

MI has been found useful for strengthening the motivation for behavioral change in patients with various behavioral - ly influenced health problems and for promoting treatment adherence. It can be used to optimize medical interventions. Further research is needed with respect to its specific mechanisms of action, its efficacy in reinforcing health-promoting modes of be - havior, differential indications for different patient groups, and the cost-efficiency of the technique across the spectrum of disorders in which it is used.

摘要

背景

与健康相关的行为模式中的激励因素是医疗实践中的一个重要问题。动机访谈(MI)是一种专门开发的技术,旨在帮助犹豫不决的患者改变行为。

方法

本综述基于通过在 PubMed、Cochrane 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行选择性搜索检索到的相关出版物。特别关注关于 MI 在各种目标群体的医疗保健中的疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。本综述重点关注 MI 对高患病率障碍患者的相关性。

结果

荟萃分析显示,与对照组中的标准治疗和无治疗相比,MI 在医疗保健方面对各种与健康相关的行为模式具有统计学上显著的平均干预效果(优势比 [OR]:1.55;95%置信区间:[1.40;1.71])。报告了关于物质消费、体育活动、口腔卫生、体重、治疗依从性、改变行为的意愿和死亡率的统计学上显著的效应大小;对促进健康行为的影响则存在差异。对促成 MI 疗效的因素的研究表明,它主要通过选择性强化患者自己关于行为潜在变化的陈述来发挥作用。

结论

MI 已被证明可用于增强各种受行为影响的健康问题患者改变行为的动机,并促进治疗依从性。它可用于优化医疗干预措施。需要进一步研究其具体作用机制、在强化促进健康行为模式方面的疗效、不同患者群体的不同适应证、以及在其使用的各种疾病谱中的技术的成本效益。