Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA.
Center for Humanism, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1697-1703. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06733-5. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
We previously validated a 5-item compassion measure to assess patient experience of clinician compassion in the outpatient setting. However, currently, there is no validated and feasible method for health care systems to measure patient experience of clinician compassion in the inpatient setting across multiple hospitals.
To test if the 5-item compassion measure can validly and distinctly measure patient assessment of physician and nurse compassion in the inpatient setting.
Cross-sectional study between July 1 and July 31, 2020, in a US health care network of 91 community hospitals across 16 states consisting of approximately 15,000 beds.
Adult patients who had an inpatient hospital stay and completed the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey.
We adapted the original 5-item compassion measure to be specific for physicians, as well as for nurses. We disseminated both measures with the HCAHPS survey and used confirmatory factor analysis for validity testing. We tested reliability using Cronbach's alpha, as well as convergent validity with patient assessment of physician and nursing communication and overall hospital rating questions from HCAHPS.
We analyzed 4756 patient responses. Confirmatory factor analysis found good fit for two distinct constructs (i.e., physician and nurse compassion). Both measures demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha > 0.90) and good convergent validity but reflected a construct (compassionate care) distinct from what is currently captured in HCAHPS.
We validated two 5-item tools that can distinctly measure patient experience of physician and nurse compassion for use in the inpatient hospital setting in conjunction with HCAHPS.
我们之前验证了一种 5 项同情心量表,用于评估门诊环境中临床医生对患者同情心的体验。然而,目前,医疗系统还没有经过验证且可行的方法来衡量多个医院住院患者对临床医生同情心的体验。
测试 5 项同情心量表是否可以有效地、明确地衡量患者对住院环境中医生和护士同情心的评估。
2020 年 7 月 1 日至 7 月 31 日,在美国一个由 16 个州的 91 家社区医院组成的医疗网络中进行的横断面研究,该网络包含大约 15000 张床位。
住院的成年患者,并完成了医院消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统(HCAHPS)调查。
我们改编了原始的 5 项同情心量表,使其更具体地适用于医生和护士。我们将这两个量表与 HCAHPS 调查一起传播,并使用验证性因子分析进行有效性测试。我们使用 Cronbach's alpha 测试可靠性,以及与 HCAHPS 中患者对医生和护理沟通以及整体医院评分问题的收敛有效性。
我们分析了 4756 名患者的回答。验证性因子分析发现,两个独特的结构(即医生和护士的同情心)具有良好的拟合度。这两个量表都表现出良好的内部一致性(alpha > 0.90)和良好的收敛有效性,但反映了一种与 HCAHPS 目前所捕捉的不同的结构(关爱护理)。
我们验证了两种 5 项工具,它们可以分别衡量住院患者对医生和护士同情心的体验,可与 HCAHPS 一起使用。