• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的最佳手术治疗方法是什么?

What is the best surgical treatment for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans?

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2021 Apr;184(4):e126-e147. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19837.

DOI:10.1111/bjd.19837
PMID:33835484
Abstract

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, slow-growing skin cancer that is primarily treated with surgery. Because this cancer can spread deep into the skin and surrounding tissue in an irregular way, it is notoriously difficult to ensure that it has been completely removed after conventional surgery and histological examination. Standard treatment in the UK is either wide local excision (WLE) or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). In WLE, the tumour and a predetermined margin of skin around it is removed. The margin is usually in the range of 1-5 cm. MMS involves removing the tumour and a much smaller margin around it, followed by immediate microscopic examination of the edges of the removed skin. Areas still containing tumour cells are then removed. This is repeated until all the edges are clear of tumour cells. This method allows the surgeon to track the tumour and only remove tissue where is it present. This study was carried out at several centres in the UK. Clinical records were examined of cases of DFSP between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2013. This study includes the largest number of cases of DFSP reported in the UK: 483 new and 64 recurring cases of DFSP, in 11 plastic surgery and 15 dermatology departments. The methods used to perform these 547 surgeries were analysed. Almost 75% of cases of new DFSP were treated with WLE and 20% were treated with MMS. For recurring DFSP, 69% of patients had WLE and 23% had MMS. After a median follow-up period of just over 2 years for new DFSP and 1.6 years for recurring DFSP, the tumour returned in six patients after WLE and none after MMS. Although no DFSP were found to have returned after MMS, the study could not detect any significant difference in recurrences between the two surgical methods. Until data from more detailed studies are available, the choice of treatment for DFSP should be based on the patient's preference, treatment availability and cost. Linked Article: Durack et al. Br J Dermatol 2021; 184:731-739.

摘要

隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤(DFSP)是一种罕见的、生长缓慢的皮肤癌,主要通过手术治疗。由于这种癌症会以不规则的方式向皮肤和周围组织深处扩散,因此在常规手术后通过组织学检查确保完全切除是非常困难的。英国的标准治疗方法是广泛局部切除(WLE)或 Mohs 显微外科手术(MMS)。在 WLE 中,肿瘤及其周围预定的皮肤边界会被切除。边界通常在 1-5 厘米之间。MMS 涉及切除肿瘤及其周围更小的边界,然后立即对切除皮肤的边缘进行显微镜检查。然后切除仍含有肿瘤细胞的区域。重复此过程,直到所有边缘都没有肿瘤细胞为止。这种方法允许外科医生跟踪肿瘤并仅切除存在肿瘤的组织。这项研究在英国的几个中心进行。对 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日期间诊断的 DFSP 病例的临床记录进行了检查。这项研究包括英国报告的最大数量的 DFSP 病例:11 个整形外科和 15 个皮肤科科室共报告了 483 例新发病例和 64 例复发病例。分析了进行这 547 例手术的方法。近 75%的新发病例采用 WLE 治疗,20%采用 MMS 治疗。对于复发性 DFSP,69%的患者采用 WLE,23%的患者采用 MMS。新发病例的中位随访期略超过 2 年,复发病例的随访期为 1.6 年。在 WLE 治疗后,有 6 名患者的肿瘤复发,而在 MMS 治疗后无患者肿瘤复发。尽管在 MMS 治疗后没有发现 DFSP 复发,但这项研究无法检测到两种手术方法之间的复发率存在任何显著差异。在更详细的研究数据可用之前,DFSP 的治疗选择应基于患者的偏好、治疗的可及性和成本。相关文章:Durack 等人,《英国皮肤病学杂志》2021;184:731-739。

相似文献

1
What is the best surgical treatment for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans?隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的最佳手术治疗方法是什么?
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Apr;184(4):e126-e147. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19837.
2
The efficacy of Mohs micrographic surgery over the traditional wide local excision surgery in the cure of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.莫氏显微外科手术相较于传统广泛局部切除手术治疗隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的疗效。
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Aug 13;33:297. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.297.17692. eCollection 2019.
3
A comparison between Mohs micrographic surgery and wide surgical excision for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.莫氏显微外科手术与广泛手术切除治疗隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的比较。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996 Jul;35(1):82-7.
4
A 10-year review of surgical management of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.一项关于隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的手术治疗的 10 年回顾。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Apr;184(4):731-739. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19346. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: wide local excision vs. Mohs micrographic surgery.隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤:广泛局部切除与莫氏显微外科手术对比
Cancer Treat Rev. 2008 Dec;34(8):728-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
6
Wide local excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, and reconstructive options for treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the breast: A retrospective case series from Mayo Clinic.广泛局部切除、Mohs 显微描记手术和重建选择治疗乳房隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤:来自 Mayo 诊所的回顾性病例系列。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 May 6;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03022-9.
7
Mohs micrographic surgery for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP): a single-centre series of 76 patients treated by frozen-section Mohs micrographic surgery with a review of the literature.Mohs 显微外科手术治疗隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤(DFSP):单中心 76 例冷冻切片 Mohs 显微外科手术治疗的系列研究及文献复习。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Oct;67(10):1315-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 May 23.
8
A Comparison of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Wide Local Excision for Treatment of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans With Long-Term Follow-up: The Mayo Clinic Experience.莫氏显微外科手术与广泛局部切除治疗隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的长期随访比较:梅奥诊所经验
Dermatol Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):98-106. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000910.
9
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a report on 29 patients treated by Mohs micrographic surgery with long-term follow-up and review of the literature.隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤:29例采用莫氏显微外科手术治疗患者的报告及长期随访与文献复习
Cancer. 2004 Jul 1;101(1):28-38. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20316.
10
Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Recurrence After Wide Local Excision Versus Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.广泛局部切除与莫氏显微外科手术后隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤复发情况:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Dermatol Surg. 2022 May 1;48(5):479-485. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003411. Epub 2022 Mar 30.