• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床操作可委托专业活动评估工具:心理测量学研究。

Entrustable professional activity assessment tool for clinical procedures: A psychometric study.

机构信息

Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2021 Oct;30(19-20):2822-2831. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15788. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.15788
PMID:33835595
Abstract

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

To test the psychometric properties of the entrustable professional activity assessment tool for clinical procedures to be administered to clinical trainers and students.

BACKGROUND

Students' ability to perform clinical procedures professionally and safely is a key concern for healthcare educators. The assessment of professional activities, in which entrustment is a key outcome, is crucial for determining the level of training and supervision of work-based assessments. The entrustable professional activities for clinical procedures (EPA-CP) have been used among clinical trainers, but it needs more psychometric testing.

DESIGN

The psychometric study used a cross-sectional design.

METHODS

Students' self-assessment (n = 302) and the supervisors' ratings on the students' performance in clinical procedures (n = 266) were used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the six-item EPA-CP assessment tool. Internal consistency and test-retest reliabilities of the assessment tool were examined. Convergent, known-groups, analysis of structural validity were conducted to investigate the tool's construct and factorial structure. The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was followed.

RESULTS

The EPA-CP assessment tool demonstrated good reliability, satisfactory convergent validity and significant differences in the known-group comparison. The exploratory factor and confirmatory factor analyses indicated the cogent constructs of the assessment tool when administered to students and their supervisors.

CONCLUSION

The EPA-CP assessment tool is a valid, reliable and user-friendly tool for evaluating healthcare students' capability to perform clinical procedures. This tool makes it possible for the precise assessment of learners in performing procedures in busy and dynamic clinical settings.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Reliable instruments are needed to effectively assess healthcare students' ability to perform clinical procedures and enable trainers to entrust students with the tasks. The results indicate that the EPA-CP assessment is promising and may be used in the healthcare settings.

摘要

目的和目标

测试临床程序可委托专业活动评估工具的心理计量学特性,以对临床培训师和学生进行评估。

背景

学生专业且安全地执行临床操作的能力是医疗保健教育者关注的关键。专业活动评估是确定基于工作的评估培训和监督水平的关键,其中委托是一个关键结果。临床程序的可委托专业活动(EPA-CP)已在临床培训师中使用,但需要更多的心理计量学测试。

设计

使用横断面设计进行心理计量学研究。

方法

使用学生的自我评估(n=302)和主管对学生在临床操作中的表现的评分(n=266)来评估六项目 EPA-CP 评估工具的心理计量学特性。检查了评估工具的内部一致性和重测信度。进行了收敛性、已知群体、结构有效性分析,以研究工具的结构和因子结构。遵循了横断面研究的 STROBE 清单。

结果

EPA-CP 评估工具表现出良好的可靠性、令人满意的收敛有效性和已知群体比较中的显著差异。探索性因子和验证性因子分析表明,当对学生及其主管进行评估时,评估工具具有有力的结构。

结论

EPA-CP 评估工具是一种评估医疗保健学生执行临床操作能力的有效、可靠和用户友好的工具。该工具使得在繁忙和动态的临床环境中对学习者进行精确评估成为可能。

临床相关性

需要可靠的工具来有效地评估医疗保健学生执行临床操作的能力,并使培训师能够将任务委托给学生。结果表明,EPA-CP 评估具有很大的潜力,可能在医疗保健环境中使用。

相似文献

1
Entrustable professional activity assessment tool for clinical procedures: A psychometric study.临床操作可委托专业活动评估工具:心理测量学研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Oct;30(19-20):2822-2831. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15788. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
2
Introducing an assessment tool based on a full set of end-of-training EPAs to capture the workplace performance of final-year medical students.引入一种基于整套结业后评估方案的评估工具,以捕捉医学应届毕业生在工作场所的表现。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1600-4.
3
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
4
Perceived professional preparedness of senior nursing students' questionnaire: Development and psychometric evaluation.护理专业高年级学生感知专业准备情况问卷:编制与心理测量学评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Oct;93:104533. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104533. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
5
Workplace-based assessments of entrustable professional activities in a psychiatry core clerkship: an observational study.精神科核心实习中基于工作场所的可托付专业活动评估:一项观察性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 21;21(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02637-4.
6
Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy for clinical evaluation scale in Turkish nursing students.土耳其护理专业学生临床评估量表自我效能感的心理测量学特性
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Apr;23(7-8):976-84. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12257. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
7
Development and psychometric evaluation of the community care competency scale in multi-ethnic undergraduate nursing students.多民族本科护生社区护理能力量表的编制与心理测量学评价
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):e802-e813. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12809. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
Core Competence in Fundamental Nursing Practicum Scale: A validity and reliability analysis.基础护理实践核心能力量表:效度和信度分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Jul;62:103352. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103352. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
Design, implementation and evaluation of novel work-based clinical assessment tool: An e-portfolio with embedded Entrustable Professional Activities.新型基于工作的临床评估工具的设计、实施和评估:带有嵌入式可信赖专业活动的电子档案袋。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Dec;107:105101. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105101. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
10
A psychometric evaluation of inter-professional education competency tool in nursing and medicine students.护理和医学专业学生跨专业教育能力工具的心理测量学评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 1;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04991-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of fellowship program director opinions of entrustable professional activities in adolescent medicine fellowship.青少年医学研究员研究员计划主任对可委托专业活动的意见分析。
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2024 Mar 25;36(3):237-242. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2023-0154. eCollection 2024 Jun 1.