• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理专业高年级学生感知专业准备情况问卷:编制与心理测量学评价。

Perceived professional preparedness of senior nursing students' questionnaire: Development and psychometric evaluation.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Oct;93:104533. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104533. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104533
PMID:32745792
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nursing students' perceptions of their professional preparedness help them perform their independent nursing role with self-confidence.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and psychometric testing of an instrument, the "Perceived Professional Preparedness of senior Nursing Students" questionnaire.

DESIGN

Mixed-method exploratory study.

METHODS

We conducted this study in two phases: (1) development of initial questionnaire through interview and literature review; (2) evaluation of psychometric properties of the instrument to introduce a reliable, valid tool.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

We assessed qualitative and quantitative face validity of initial questionnaire by administering it to 10 nursing students. Then, a panel of 10 nursing specialists determined the Content Validity Index. After modifying items, we assessed the construct validity of the 45-item questionnaire. A sample of 159 senior nursing students completed the questionnaire, and we conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis using this data. To assess the test-retest reliability, 30 students completed the instrument twice with a two-week time interval.

RESULTS

The Content Validity Index with the modified Kappa coefficient was calculated as ≥0.72, which is considered satisfactory. In exploratory factor analysis using the maximum likelihood method and varimax rotation, we extracted 19 items in four factors. This structure included 61.91% of the total variance. The factors were clinical competency, evidence-based practice, framework-oriented performance, and patient-centered care. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and McDonald's omega values higher than 0.70 and inter-class correlation coefficient above 0.90 for all factors confirmed reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a suitable fitting of the final developed model.

CONCLUSION

The developed questionnaire is a valid, reliable tool to assess the perceived preparedness of senior nursing students for transition to the clinical setting. Further psychometric testing for this questionnaire on larger populations and in different contexts is suggested.

摘要

背景

护理学生对自身专业准备程度的认知有助于他们自信地履行独立的护理角色。

目的

开发并对“护理专业高年级学生专业准备度感知”问卷进行心理测量学测试。

设计

混合方法探索性研究。

方法

我们分两个阶段进行了这项研究:(1)通过访谈和文献回顾制定初始问卷;(2)评估工具的心理测量学特性,以引入可靠、有效的工具。

设置和参与者

我们通过对 10 名护理专业学生施测初始问卷,评估其定性和定量表面效度。然后,由 10 名护理专家组成的小组确定内容效度指数。在修改项目后,我们评估了包含 45 个项目的问卷的结构效度。159 名护理专业高年级学生完成了问卷,我们使用这些数据进行了探索性和验证性因子分析。为了评估测试-重测信度,30 名学生在两周的时间间隔内两次完成了该工具。

结果

修改后的 Kappa 系数的内容效度指数被计算为≥0.72,这被认为是令人满意的。在使用最大似然法和方差极大旋转的探索性因子分析中,我们从 45 个项目中提取了 19 个项目,分为四个因子。该结构包含了总方差的 61.91%。这四个因子分别是临床能力、循证实践、框架导向表现和以患者为中心的护理。所有因子的克朗巴赫 α系数和麦克唐纳 ω值均高于 0.70,组内相关系数高于 0.90,这表明信度良好。验证性因子分析表明,最终开发的模型具有合适的拟合度。

结论

开发的问卷是一种有效的、可靠的工具,可用于评估护理专业高年级学生向临床环境过渡的专业准备程度。建议在更大的人群和不同的环境中对该问卷进行进一步的心理测量学测试。

相似文献

1
Perceived professional preparedness of senior nursing students' questionnaire: Development and psychometric evaluation.护理专业高年级学生感知专业准备情况问卷:编制与心理测量学评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Oct;93:104533. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104533. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
2
Development and psychometric evaluation of the community care competency scale in multi-ethnic undergraduate nursing students.多民族本科护生社区护理能力量表的编制与心理测量学评价
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):e802-e813. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12809. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Verbal and Social Interaction Questionnaire: A cross-sectional study among nursing students in China.言语和社会互动问卷的跨文化调适和心理测量测试:中国护理学生的横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jun;28(11-12):2181-2196. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14811. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
4
Psychometric evaluation of undergraduate student nurses' learning perceived needs in disaster nursing: Two cross-sectional studies.本科护生灾难护理学习需求感知的心理测量学评价:两项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jan;84:104208. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104208. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
5
Development and Testing of the Psychometric Properties of the Attitude Towards Medical Device-related Pressure Ulcers/Injuries Questionnaire.医疗设备相关压疮/损伤态度问卷心理测量学特性的开发与测试
Wound Manag Prev. 2021 Mar;67(3):30-35.
6
A psychometric evaluation of inter-professional education competency tool in nursing and medicine students.护理和医学专业学生跨专业教育能力工具的心理测量学评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 1;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04991-x.
7
Core Competence in Fundamental Nursing Practicum Scale: A validity and reliability analysis.基础护理实践核心能力量表:效度和信度分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Jul;62:103352. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103352. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
Chinese version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床学习环境比较调查中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
9
Development and validation of Dutch version of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in hospital practice: An instrument design study.《荷兰版拉萨特临床判断评分标准在医院实践中的开发与验证:一项工具设计研究》
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
10
Use of intuition by nursing students: instrument development and testing.护理专业学生直觉的运用:工具开发与测试。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Sep;47(6):614-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03149.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of an Agricultural Safety and Health Literacy Tool.农业安全与健康素养工具的开发与验证
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jul 17;18:4059-4070. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S528979. eCollection 2025.
2
Adaptation and Validation of the Readiness for Practice Instrument for Senior Undergraduate Nursing Students in China.中国本科高年级护生实践准备度测评工具的改编与验证
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Jul 6;2023:8345744. doi: 10.1155/2023/8345744. eCollection 2023.
3
Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the attitudes to disability scale in people with physical disabilities.
伊朗版身体残疾者残疾态度量表的心理测量学特性
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 27;13(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02493-7.
4
A psychometric appraisal of a revised preparedness for medication administration questionnaire in final-year undergraduate nursing students: a secondary analysis.对本科护理专业最后一年学生修订后的用药准备情况调查问卷的心理测量评估:一项二次分析。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 27;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02699-5.
5
Readiness levels of intern nursing students during the transition to professional practice within the Al Jouf Region in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯朱夫地区实习护生向专业实践过渡期间的准备水平。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 21;23(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02106-5.
6
Development and validation of Adaptability to Return-to-Work Scale (ARTWS) for cancer patients.癌症患者重返工作岗位适应能力量表(ARTWS)的开发与验证
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 29;14:1275331. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1275331. eCollection 2023.
7
Perceived professional preparedness and identity among senior nursing students: a latent profile Analysis.高年级护生的专业准备度认知与职业认同感:一项潜在剖面分析
BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 29;23(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01965-2.
8
The Perception of Preparedness in Undergraduate Nursing Students During COVID-19.本科护生对 COVID-19 期间准备情况的感知。
J Prof Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct;42:111-121. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.06.002. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
9
Development of an Instrument to Measure Dietary Supplement Health Literacy.膳食补充剂健康素养测评工具的研制
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Apr;6(2):e159-e166. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220523-02. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
10
Comparison of self-, peer, and teachers' evaluation about the clinical skills of nursing students at the department of psychiatry.精神科护理专业学生临床技能的自我评估、同伴评估与教师评估比较
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Oct 29;10:397. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1034_20. eCollection 2021.