Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Drug Test Anal. 2022 Mar;14(3):567-577. doi: 10.1002/dta.3043. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
The stimulating and performance-enhancing properties of caffeine are often explored in one the most consumed types of supplements: the pre-workout supplements (PWS). However, despite the popularity of PWS, previous studies have reported incompatibilities between what is described in their labels and their actual caffeine content. This study aimed to develop, to optimize, and to validate a gas-chromatography coupled to nitrogen-phosphorus detector (GC-NPD) method to quantify caffeine in PWS and to analyze commercial PWS marketed in Brazil to estimate the caffeine daily intake. For this purpose, three different extraction procedures were evaluated: agitation in vortex, shaker, and sonication. Sonication yielded the best extraction results. Next, the parameters' temperature and time were optimized by using central composite rotatable design (CCRD) and response surface methodology, which revealed the optimal values of 70°C and 10 min. The method was validated and applied to quantify caffeine in 52 PWS. From the 36 PWS labels that specified the caffeine amount, seven (19%) presented more than 120% of the declared quantity, whereas 15 (42%) contained less than 80% of the labeled caffeine. Additionally, six products presented undeclared caffeine. Considering the label stated doses, five supplements exceeded the safe caffeine daily intake (400 mg). On the basis of these findings, supplement quality control remains an issue that deserves more attention from consumers, manufacturers, and regulatory agencies. Finally, we suggest that PWS consumers be careful of the habit of ingesting caffeine through other sources and avoid ingesting two or more different PWS products in the same day.
即健身前补充剂 (PWS)。然而,尽管 PWS 很受欢迎,但之前的研究报告称其标签上描述的内容与其实际的咖啡因含量之间存在不兼容的情况。本研究旨在开发、优化和验证一种气相色谱法与氮磷检测器 (GC-NPD) 相结合的方法,用于定量 PWS 中的咖啡因,并分析在巴西市场上销售的商业 PWS,以估计咖啡因的每日摄入量。为此,评估了三种不同的提取程序:搅拌、震荡和超声。超声产生了最佳的提取效果。接下来,通过使用中心复合旋转设计 (CCRD) 和响应面法优化了温度和时间参数,得到了最佳值为 70°C 和 10 分钟。该方法经过验证并应用于定量分析 52 种 PWS 中的咖啡因。从指定咖啡因含量的 36 个 PWS 标签中,有七个(19%)的含量超过了宣称数量的 120%,而 15 个(42%)的含量低于标签上咖啡因含量的 80%。此外,有六个产品含有未申报的咖啡因。考虑到标签上规定的剂量,有五种补充剂超过了安全的每日咖啡因摄入量(400 毫克)。基于这些发现,补充剂质量控制仍然是一个值得消费者、制造商和监管机构更多关注的问题。最后,我们建议 PWS 消费者注意通过其他来源摄入咖啡因的习惯,并避免在同一天摄入两种或更多不同的 PWS 产品。