• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生,请让我更自由:以增强能力为目标的医学。

Doctor, please make me freer: Capabilities enhancement as a goal of medicine.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Department of Philosophy, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Sep;24(3):409-419. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10016-5. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1007/s11019-021-10016-5
PMID:33837472
Abstract

Biomedical innovations are making possible the enhancement of human capabilities. There are two philosophical stances on the role that medicine should play in this respect. On the one hand, naturalism rejects every medical intervention that goes beyond preventing and treating disease. On the other hand, welfarism advocates enhancements that foster subjective well-being. We will show that both positions have considerable shortcomings. Consequently, we will introduce a third characterization in which therapies and enhancements can be reconciled with the legitimate objectives of medicine inasmuch as they improve the capabilities that enable the freedom to pursue personal well-being.

摘要

生物医学创新正在使增强人类能力成为可能。在医学在这方面应该发挥的作用方面,存在两种哲学立场。一方面,自然主义拒绝一切超越预防和治疗疾病的医学干预。另一方面,福利主义提倡促进主观幸福感的增强。我们将表明,这两种立场都有相当大的缺点。因此,我们将引入第三种描述,在这种描述中,只要治疗和增强能够改善实现个人幸福的自由能力,它们就可以与医学的合法目标相协调。

相似文献

1
Doctor, please make me freer: Capabilities enhancement as a goal of medicine.医生,请让我更自由:以增强能力为目标的医学。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Sep;24(3):409-419. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10016-5. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
2
Autonomy, procedural and substantive: a discussion of the ethics of cognitive enhancement.自主性、程序性和实质性:关于认知增强的伦理讨论。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Dec;25(4):729-736. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10110-2. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
3
Anagogy of autonomy.自主性的神秘解释
Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth. 2000 Jul;10(4):113-9.
4
Neither for love nor money: why doctors must not kill.无论如何都不行:医生为何绝不能杀人。
Public Interest. 1989 Winter;No. 94:25-46.
5
Liberal rationalism and medical decision-making.自由主义理性主义与医学决策
Bioethics. 1997 Apr;11(2):115-29. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00049.
6
The experience of freedom in decisions - Questioning philosophical beliefs in favor of psychological determinants.决策中的自由体验——质疑支持心理决定因素的哲学信念。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 May;33:30-46. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
7
The friendship model of physician/patient relationship and patient autonomy.医患关系的友谊模式与患者自主性。
Bioethics. 1988 Jan;2(1):23-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1988.tb00033.x.
8
Must physicians treat the "whole man" for proper medical care?医生必须治疗“完整的人”才能提供恰当的医疗护理吗?
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 1976 Jan;39(1):8-11.
9
[Power of personal goal sharing--treatment plan using personal goal maps for patients with mental disorders].[个人目标分享的力量——使用个人目标地图为精神障碍患者制定治疗计划]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2011;113(10):1028-35.
10
On knowing one's chains and decking them with flowers: limits on patient autonomy in The Silent World of Doctor and Patient.论知晓自身枷锁并为之饰以鲜花:《医患的沉默世界》中患者自主权的限度
West New Engl Law Rev. 1987;9(1):31-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Well-being and enhancement: reassessing the welfarist account.福祉与提升:重新评估福利主义观点。
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Jun;28(2):185-197. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10246-3. Epub 2025 Jan 10.