Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Sydney, Australia.
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Apr 13;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2020-0385.
The key aim of this narrative literature review, therefore, is to identify the key conceptual categories that inform the construction of positive person-centred culture within hospitals, and how these frameworks are brought to bear upon organisational culture within healthcare systems in Australia.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This narrative review presents a thematic synthesis of literature identified through a systematic search protocol undertaken across 19 academic databases and Google Scholar as an additional search tool. Thematic qualitative analysis was performed on the research results to determine the common themes within the diverse literature presented within this study.
Culture change interventions in hospitals attempt to address the problem of widespread unprofessional behaviour within healthcare systems. However, diverse definitions and seemingly fragmented approaches to understanding and enacting organisational culture change present a significant hurdle in achieving cohesive and sustainable healthcare reform. This narrative literature review offers a comprehensive conceptual view of the key approaches that inform positive person-centred culture within hospital settings. In total, three primary dimensions, belonging, behaving and being, aligned against organisational goals, individual behaviours and worker as well as organisational identity were identified. Other individual and group interactional dynamics that give rise to negative organisational culture are further analysed to understand the fault lines along which existing culture change interventions are typically operationalised.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This review is not exhaustive and is limited in its methodological scope. The central values and themes identified within the literature are integral to designing humanised healthcare systems. However, owing to the qualitative nature and contextual variability of these factors, these themes do not lend themselves to replicable quantification.
This analysis contributes to foundational research efforts towards transforming healthcare practice to be more aligned with humanised and equitable values within increasingly complex healthcare organisational settings. Designing culture change interventions that align more suitably with the values-driven categories identified in this literature review may increase the effectiveness and sustainability of these interventions and reform efforts at organisational and systemic levels.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This article presents a comprehensive framework to approach healthcare organisational reform through shared and equitable models of operation, management and governance rather than continuing to promote narrowly defined outcomes derived from commodified models of healthcare practice.
本叙事文献综述的主要目的是确定构成医院积极以人为主导文化的关键概念类别,以及这些框架如何在澳大利亚医疗保健系统内对组织文化产生影响。
设计/方法/途径:本叙事综述通过系统搜索协议在 19 个学术数据库和 Google Scholar 中进行了文献检索,并将其作为额外的搜索工具,对文献进行了主题综合分析。对研究结果进行了主题定性分析,以确定本研究中呈现的多样化文献中的共同主题。
医院的文化变革干预试图解决医疗保健系统中普遍存在的不专业行为问题。然而,对组织文化变革的理解和实施的多样化定义和看似零散的方法,是实现连贯和可持续医疗改革的一个重大障碍。本叙事文献综述提供了一个全面的概念视图,了解在医院环境中构建积极以人为主导文化的关键方法。总共确定了三个主要维度,即归属感、行为和存在,与组织目标、个人行为以及工人和组织身份相对应。进一步分析导致负面组织文化的其他个人和群体互动动态,以了解现有文化变革干预措施通常运作的断层线。
研究局限性/影响:本综述并非详尽无遗,并且在方法学范围上受到限制。文献中确定的核心价值观和主题对于设计人性化的医疗保健系统至关重要。然而,由于这些因素的定性性质和背景可变性,这些主题不适合可复制的量化。
这项分析有助于为基础研究做出贡献,以将医疗保健实践转变为更符合人性化和公平价值观的方向,特别是在日益复杂的医疗保健组织环境中。设计更符合文献综述中确定的以人为本和公平价值观的文化变革干预措施,可能会提高这些干预措施和组织及系统层面改革努力的有效性和可持续性。
原创性/价值:本文提出了一个全面的框架,通过共享和公平的运作、管理和治理模式来处理医疗保健组织改革,而不是继续推广源自商品化医疗保健实践模式的狭义定义的结果。