Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Mar;51(2):16-21. doi: 10.1002/hast.1241.
Harrowing stories reported in the media describe Covid-19 ravaging through families. This essay reports professional experiences of this phenomenon, family clustering, as encountered during the pandemic's spread across Southern California. We identify three ethical challenges following from it: Family clustering impedes shared decision-making by reducing available surrogate decision-makers for incapacitated patients, increases the emotional burdens of surrogate decision-makers, and exacerbates health disparities for and the suffering of people of color at increased likelihood of experiencing family clustering. We propose that, in response to these challenges, efforts in advance care planning be expanded, emotional support offered to surrogates and family members be increased, more robust state guidance be issued on ethical decision-making for unrepresented patients, ethics consultation be increased in the setting of conflict following from family clustering dynamics, and health care professionals pay more attention to systemic and personal racial biases and inequities that affect patient care and the surrogate experience.
媒体上报道的惨痛故事描述了新冠疫情在家庭中肆虐。本文报告了在南加州疫情蔓延期间遇到的这种现象,即家庭聚集,以及与之相关的专业经验。我们从中识别出三个伦理挑战:家庭聚集通过减少无行为能力患者的可用替代决策人,增加替代决策人的情感负担,并加剧健康不平等和有色人种的痛苦,从而阻碍了共同决策,因为他们更有可能经历家庭聚集。我们提出,作为对这些挑战的回应,应扩大预先护理计划的努力,增加对代理人和家庭成员的情感支持,就无代表患者的伦理决策发布更有力的州指导意见,在家庭聚集动态引发冲突的情况下增加伦理咨询,并让医疗保健专业人员更加关注影响患者护理和代理人体验的系统性和个人种族偏见和不平等。