Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center (S.O., L.Y., A.C., Z.A., L.L.B., J.A.S., D.A.B., A.S.B.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Department of Neurological Sciences (S.O., L.Y., A.C., Z.A., L.L.B., J.A.S., D.A.B., A.S.B.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Stroke. 2021 Jun;52(6):2060-2067. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030226. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
The general cardiovascular Framingham risk score (FRS) identifies adults at increased risk for stroke. We tested the hypothesis that baseline FRS is associated with the presence of postmortem cerebrovascular disease (CVD) pathologies.
We studied the brains of 1672 older decedents with baseline FRS and measured CVD pathologies including macroinfarcts, microinfarcts, atherosclerosis, arteriolosclerosis, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. We employed a series of logistic regressions to examine the association of baseline FRS with each of the 5 CVD pathologies.
Average age at baseline was 80.5±7.0 years and average age at death was 89.2±6.7 years. A higher baseline FRS was associated with higher odds of macroinfarcts (odds ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.07-1.13], <0.001), microinfarcts (odds ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07], =0.009), atherosclerosis (odds ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.11], <0.001), and arteriolosclerosis (odds ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07], =0.005). C statistics for these models ranged from 0.537 to 0.595 indicating low accuracy for predicting CVD pathologies. FRS was not associated with the presence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy.
A higher FRS score in older adults is associated with higher odds of some, but not all, CVD pathologies, with low discrimination at the individual level. Further work is needed to develop a more robust risk score to identify adults at risk for accumulating CVD pathologies.
通用心血管弗雷明汉风险评分(FRS)可识别出中风风险较高的成年人。我们检验了以下假说,即基线 FRS 与死后脑血管疾病(CVD)病理学有关。
我们研究了 1672 名有基线 FRS 的老年死者的大脑,并测量了 CVD 病理学,包括大梗死、微梗死、动脉粥样硬化、小动脉硬化和脑淀粉样血管病。我们采用一系列逻辑回归来检验基线 FRS 与 5 种 CVD 病理学之间的关联。
基线时的平均年龄为 80.5±7.0 岁,死亡时的平均年龄为 89.2±6.7 岁。基线 FRS 越高,大梗死(比值比,1.10[95%置信区间,1.07-1.13],<0.001)、微梗死(比值比,1.04[95%置信区间,1.01-1.07],=0.009)、动脉粥样硬化(比值比,1.07[95%置信区间,1.04-1.11],<0.001)和小动脉硬化(比值比,1.04[95%置信区间,1.01-1.07],=0.005)的可能性更高。这些模型的 C 统计量范围为 0.537 至 0.595,表明预测 CVD 病理学的准确性较低。FRS 与脑淀粉样血管病的发生无关。
在老年人中,较高的 FRS 评分与某些但不是所有 CVD 病理学的可能性更高相关,但在个体水平上的区分度较低。需要进一步的工作来开发更强大的风险评分,以识别有发生 CVD 病理学风险的成年人。