• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在持续性/维持性治疗阶段,对于没有共病焦虑障碍的重性抑郁障碍患者,评估 DSM-5“焦虑痛苦”特征的重要性如何?

How significant is the assessment of the DSM-5 'anxious distress' specifier in patients with major depressive disorder without comorbid anxiety disorders in the continuation/maintenance phase?

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Psychiatry, JCHO Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;25(4):385-392. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2021.1907415. Epub 2021 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1080/13651501.2021.1907415
PMID:33840340
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anxious distress (ANXD), which is common in major depressive disorder (MDD), is associated with poor outcomes. We investigated clinical characteristics of MDD patients with the DSM-5 ANXD specifier and only mild residual symptoms without comorbid anxiety disorders in the continuation/maintenance phase.

METHODS

We recruited 110 outpatients with MDD without comorbid anxiety disorders. They were interviewed; the presence of the DSM-5 ANXD specifier was assessed. They completed the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (S-EPQ), the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-Autoquestionnaire (TEMPS-A).

RESULTS

The mean QIDS total score was 9.7 ± 5.5. The DSM-5 ANXD specifier was identified in 73 patients (66.4%). A univariate analysis indicated ANXD was significantly associated with younger age; unmarried status; living alone; higher QIDS total score; higher S-EPQ neuroticism score; and higher TEMPS-A cyclothymic, depressive and irritable scores. After covariate adjustment, a multivariable linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between the QIDS total score and ANXD (three different models).

CONCLUSION

The DSM-5 ANXD was also common among MDD patients without comorbid anxiety disorders in the continuation/maintenance phase; it was significantly associated with greater depression severity and might be related to temperament associated with bipolar disorder.Key pointsDSM-5 anxious distress is common among MDD patients without comorbid anxiety disorders in the continuation/maintenance phase and correlated with some of their socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. • The presence of DSM-5 anxious distress was significantly associated with greater severity of depression and might be related to temperament associated with bipolar disorder.• The evaluation of the DSM-5 anxiety distress was revealed to have some significance not only in the acute phase but also in the continuation/maintenance phase of MDD.

摘要

目的

焦虑困扰(ANXD)在重度抑郁症(MDD)中很常见,与不良结局相关。我们在 MDD 患者的延续/维持阶段,研究了符合 DSM-5 ANXD 特征且仅存在轻度残留症状而无共病焦虑障碍的患者的临床特征。

方法

我们招募了 110 名无共病焦虑障碍的 MDD 门诊患者。对他们进行访谈;评估 DSM-5 ANXD 特征的存在情况。他们完成了抑郁症状快速清单(QIDS)、艾森克人格问卷(S-EPQ)、孟菲斯、比萨、巴黎和圣地亚哥自动问卷的脾气评估(TEMPS-A)。

结果

平均 QIDS 总分 9.7±5.5。73 名患者(66.4%)符合 DSM-5 ANXD 特征。单因素分析表明,ANXD 与年龄较小、未婚、独居、QIDS 总分较高、S-EPQ 神经质得分较高、TEMPS-A 环性、抑郁和易怒得分较高显著相关。在调整协变量后,多变量线性回归分析显示 QIDS 总分与 ANXD 之间存在显著关联(三种不同模型)。

结论

DSM-5 ANXD 在无共病焦虑障碍的 MDD 患者延续/维持阶段也很常见;与抑郁严重程度显著相关,可能与双相障碍相关的气质有关。关键点:DSM-5 焦虑困扰在无共病焦虑障碍的 MDD 患者延续/维持阶段很常见,与他们的一些社会人口学和临床特征相关。 • DSM-5 焦虑困扰的存在与抑郁严重程度显著相关,可能与双相障碍相关的气质有关。• DSM-5 焦虑困扰的评估不仅在 MDD 的急性期,而且在延续/维持阶段都具有一定的意义。

相似文献

1
How significant is the assessment of the DSM-5 'anxious distress' specifier in patients with major depressive disorder without comorbid anxiety disorders in the continuation/maintenance phase?在持续性/维持性治疗阶段,对于没有共病焦虑障碍的重性抑郁障碍患者,评估 DSM-5“焦虑痛苦”特征的重要性如何?
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;25(4):385-392. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2021.1907415. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
2
Reliability and validity of the DSM-5 Anxious Distress Specifier Interview.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版焦虑痛苦特征访谈的信度与效度
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;76:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
3
A clinically useful self-report measure of the DSM-5 anxious distress specifier for major depressive disorder.一种针对重度抑郁症的DSM-5焦虑痛苦特征的具有临床实用性的自我报告测量方法。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;75(6):601-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08961.
4
A comparative meta-analysis of TEMPS scores across mood disorder patients, their first-degree relatives, healthy controls, and other psychiatric disorders.对情绪障碍患者、其一级亲属、健康对照者及其他精神障碍患者的TEMPS评分进行的比较荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2016 May 15;196:32-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
5
Longitudinal Predictive Validity of the DSM-5 Anxious Distress Specifier for Clinical Outcomes in a Large Cohort of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.DSM-5 焦虑痛苦特征对大样本重性抑郁障碍患者临床结局的纵向预测效度。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;78(2):207-213. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10221.
6
DSM-5 anxious distress specifier in patients with bipolar depression.双相抑郁患者的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版焦虑痛苦诊断说明符
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;32(3):157-163.
7
Is there a relationship between depression with anxious distress DSM-5 specifier and bipolarity? A multicenter cohort study on patients with unipolar, bipolar I and II disorders.抑郁伴焦虑苦恼 DSM-5 特征与双相障碍之间是否存在关联?一项针对单相、双相 I 型和 II 型障碍患者的多中心队列研究。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:819-826. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
8
Tridimensional personality questionnaire factors in major depressive disorder: relationship to anxiety disorder comorbidity and age of onset.重度抑郁症中的三维人格问卷因素:与焦虑症共病及发病年龄的关系。
Psychother Psychosom. 2005;74(3):173-8. doi: 10.1159/000084002.
9
Association between anxious distress in a major depressive episode and bipolarity.重度抑郁发作中的焦虑痛苦与双相情感障碍之间的关联。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Jan 15;15:267-270. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S188947. eCollection 2019.
10
Epidemiology of Adult DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder and Its Specifiers in the United States.美国成人 DSM-5 重性抑郁障碍及其特征的流行病学。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 1;75(4):336-346. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4602.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of depression with anxious distress and melancholic depression from the perspective of psychomotor disturbance.从精神运动障碍角度比较抑郁症与焦虑性痛苦及 melancholic 抑郁症。 (注:“melancholic depression”较准确的医学中文术语是“ melancholic 抑郁发作”,这里为了贴合原文翻译为“ melancholic 抑郁症” )
PCN Rep. 2024 Oct 14;3(4):e70022. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70022. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
A psychometric analysis of the Japanese version of the clinically useful depression outcome scale supplemented with questions for the DSM-5 anxious distress specifier (CUDOS-A).《用 DSM-5 焦虑困扰特征补充问题的临床有用抑郁结局量表(CUDOS-A)日本版的心理计量分析》。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2024 Sep;44(3):526-533. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12432. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
3
High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) in major depressive disorder with anxious distress-a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial.伴有焦虑苦恼的重性抑郁障碍的高清经颅直流电刺激(HD-tDCS)-一项双盲随机假刺激对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 May 15;25(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08157-y.
4
Multiple examinations indicated associations between abnormal regional homogeneity and cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder.多项检查表明,重度抑郁症患者局部一致性异常与认知功能障碍之间存在关联。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;13:1090181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1090181. eCollection 2022.