• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Adult pectus excavatum repair: national outcomes of the Nuss and Ravitch procedures.成人漏斗胸修复术:Nuss手术和Ravitch手术的全国治疗结果
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):1396-1402. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2422.
2
Outcomes After Pectus Excavatum Repair: A Nationwide Comparison of Nuss Versus Ravitch Operations.漏斗胸修复术后的结果:Nuss 与 Ravitch 手术的全国性比较。
J Surg Res. 2024 Nov;303:381-389. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.025. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
3
Comparison of the Nuss versus Ravitch procedure for pectus excavatum repair: an updated meta-analysis.漏斗胸修复中努斯手术与拉维奇手术的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Oct;52(10):1545-1552. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.05.028. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
4
Complications after Ravitch versus Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) General Thoracic Surgery Database analysis.漏斗胸 Ravitch 修复与 Nuss 修复术后的并发症:胸外科医师学会(STS)普通胸外科数据库分析。
Surgery. 2021 Jun;169(6):1493-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.023. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
5
When patients choose: comparison of Nuss, Ravitch, and Leonard procedures for primary repair of pectus excavatum.当患者做出选择:用于漏斗胸初次修复的努斯手术、拉维奇手术和伦纳德手术的比较
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jun;44(6):1113-8; discussion 118-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.017.
6
Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.漏斗胸微创修复术。
J Vis Surg. 2016 Apr 5;2:73. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2016.03.21. eCollection 2016.
7
Analyzing Outcomes of Nuss and Ravitch Repair for Primary and Recurrent Pectus Excavatum in Adults.分析 Nuss 和 Ravitch 修复术治疗成人原发性和复发性漏斗胸的结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jul;110(1):272-275. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
8
[Non-thoracoscopic minimally invasive Nuss procedure for correction of recurrent pectus excavatum].[非胸腔镜微创Nuss手术治疗复发性漏斗胸]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Oct;22(10):1213-7.
9
Minimally invasive repair after inefficient open surgery for pectus excavatum.漏斗胸无效开放手术后的微创修复。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Sep;40(3):625-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.048. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
10
Ravitch versus Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: systematic review and meta-analysis.漏斗胸的拉维奇手术与努斯手术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Sep;5(5):409-421. doi: 10.21037/acs.2016.08.06.

引用本文的文献

1
Revision after prior failed pectus excavatum repair: higher risks and greater complications than primary surgery.既往漏斗胸修复失败后的翻修手术:风险高于初次手术,并发症更多。
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4359-4378. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-417. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
2
Modified bar bending method of thoracoscopic nuss procedure on pectus excavatum: a retrospective single-center study.改良胸腔镜 Nuss 手术的胸廓成形术弯曲棒方法:回顾性单中心研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Mar 7;23(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03909-2.
3
Academic performance in children with pectus excavatum: a real-world research with propensity score matching.漏斗胸患儿的学习成绩:基于倾向评分匹配的真实世界研究。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;17:17534666231155779. doi: 10.1177/17534666231155779.
4
Complications following metal bar removal after Nuss repair are rare in a duocentric retrospective evaluation.双中心回顾性评估中,Nuss 修复后金属棒移除的并发症罕见。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Dec;38(12):1919-1924. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05250-8. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
5
Simultaneous minimally invasive LVAD implantation and extracorporeal RVAD placement by patient with pectus excavatum and biventricular acute heart failure.漏斗胸伴双心室急性心力衰竭患者同期微创左心室辅助装置植入和体外右心室辅助装置放置。
J Artif Organs. 2023 Jun;26(2):156-159. doi: 10.1007/s10047-022-01354-z. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
6
Reshaping the Evidence for Surgical Correction of Pectus Excavatum Using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.利用心肺运动试验重塑漏斗胸手术矫正的证据
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):e025273. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025273. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
7
Minimally Invasive Modified Nuss Procedure for Repair of Pectus Excavatum in Pediatric Patients: Single-Centre Retrospective Observational Study.小儿漏斗胸修复的微创改良努斯手术:单中心回顾性观察研究
Children (Basel). 2021 Nov 20;8(11):1071. doi: 10.3390/children8111071.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the Nuss versus Ravitch procedure for pectus excavatum repair: an updated meta-analysis.漏斗胸修复中努斯手术与拉维奇手术的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Oct;52(10):1545-1552. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.05.028. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
2
Nuss procedure for repair of pectus excavatum after failed Ravitch procedure in adults: indications and caveats.成人Ravitch手术失败后采用Nuss手术修复漏斗胸:适应症及注意事项
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Aug;8(8):1981-5. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.06.60.
3
Differences in reported esophageal cancer resection outcomes between national clinical and administrative databases.国家临床和行政数据库中报告的食管癌切除术结果的差异。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Nov;144(5):1152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.010. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
4
Upper thoracic shape in children with pectus excavatum: impact on lung function.儿童漏斗胸的上胸部形状:对肺功能的影响。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013 Aug;48(8):817-23. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22660. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
5
Chest wall deformities in pediatric surgery.小儿外科学中的胸廓畸形。
Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Jun;92(3):669-84, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
6
The surgical treatment of funnel chest.
Ann Surg. 1946 Jun;123:1003-22.
7
Comparison of the Nuss and the Ravitch procedure for pectus excavatum repair: a meta-analysis.Nuss 与 Ravitch 手术治疗漏斗胸的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 May;45(5):880-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.012.
8
Routine use of minimally invasive surgery for pectus excavatum in adults.成人漏斗胸微创手术的常规应用。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Sep;86(3):952-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.078.
9
Pectus Excavatum: Report of Two Cases Successfully Operated Upon.漏斗胸:两例手术成功报告。
Ann Surg. 1944 Jun;119(6):922-34. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194406000-00012.
10
The minimally invasive Nuss technique for recurrent or failed pectus excavatum repair in 50 patients.50例复发性或失败的漏斗胸修复的微创Nuss技术
J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Jan;40(1):181-6; discussion 186-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.09.038.

成人漏斗胸修复术:Nuss手术和Ravitch手术的全国治疗结果

Adult pectus excavatum repair: national outcomes of the Nuss and Ravitch procedures.

作者信息

Brungardt Joseph G, Chizek Patrick W, Schropp Kurt P

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):1396-1402. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2422.

DOI:10.21037/jtd-20-2422
PMID:33841932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8024841/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

National data is limited on pectus excavatum, the most common chest wall deformity which is often repaired using the Ravitch and Nuss procedures. The purpose of the study was to describe demographics and outcomes of adult patients who underwent surgical repair of pectus excavatum via open and minimally invasive thoracoscopic methods.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database from 2015 to 2018 was performed, capturing patients 18 years or older with pectus excavatum as the postoperative diagnosis. Patients were placed into two groups of minimally invasive (Nuss) and open (Ravitch) repair procedure code. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 168 adult patients were captured. Most of these patients were white (84.52%) male (69.64%) and 26 years old on average. Median operative time was longer in the open repair group [250 (IQR, 173-308) versus 122 (IQR, 94-160) minutes, P<0.0001]. Median length of stay was five days (IQR, 4-6) in the open group and three days (IQR, 2-4) in the minimally invasive group (P=0.2873).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications after repair of pectus excavatum occur at similar rates between open and minimally invasive repair. Though minimally invasive repair decreases operative time and may decrease length of stay, the decision of type of procedure depends upon clinical scenario and factors unique to the individual patient.

摘要

背景

关于漏斗胸(最常见的胸壁畸形,常采用Ravitch和Nuss手术进行修复)的全国性数据有限。本研究的目的是描述通过开放和微创胸腔镜方法接受漏斗胸手术修复的成年患者的人口统计学特征和手术结果。

方法

对美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)2015年至2018年的数据库进行回顾性分析,纳入术后诊断为漏斗胸且年龄在18岁及以上的患者。患者被分为微创(Nuss)和开放(Ravitch)修复程序编码两组。分析基线特征和术后结果。

结果

共纳入168例成年患者。这些患者大多为白人(84.52%)、男性(69.64%),平均年龄26岁。开放修复组的中位手术时间更长[250(四分位间距,173 - 308)分钟对122(四分位间距,94 - 160)分钟,P<0.0001]。开放组的中位住院时间为5天(四分位间距,4 - 6),微创组为3天(四分位间距,2 - 4)(P = 0.2873)。

结论

漏斗胸修复术后的并发症在开放和微创修复中的发生率相似。虽然微创修复可缩短手术时间并可能缩短住院时间,但手术方式的选择取决于临床情况和个体患者的独特因素。