Plisky Phillip J, Bullock Garrett S, Garner Mary Beth, Ricard Risa, Hayden Josh, Huebner Bethany, Schwartzkopf-Phifer Kate, Kiesel Kyle
University of Evansville.
University of Oxford.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Apr 1;16(2):306-311. doi: 10.26603/001c.21253.
Limited ankle dorsiflexion (DF) is associated with ankle sprains and other lower extremity injuries. Current ankle measurements can be laborious to perform in an athletic environment.
The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and discriminant validity of a novel closed-chain ankle DF ROM test, the standing ankle dorsiflexion screen (SADS).
Reliability and validity study.
Thirty-seven healthy subjects participated in the study. Two raters measured closed-chain ankle DF range of motion (ROM) using a modified lunge position with an electronic inclinometer. Four raters measured ankle DF using the SADS. Reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and kappa coefficients for the raters using an electronic inclinometer and the SADS scale, respectively. An independent t-test compared the SADS categories of "behind" and "beyond" to the modified lunge test ROM (<0.05).
Excellent ICC values (0.95 [95% CI (0.92,0.97)]) and high kappa values were observed (0.61-0.81), with high percent agreement (86-94%). There was a significant difference in ankle DF ROM between the nominally scored "behind" and "beyond" categories, regardless of rater or trial analyzed (behind: 41.3° ± 4.7°; beyond: 51.8°± SD 6.1°, <0.001).
The SADS was observed to have excellent interrater reliability and high discriminant validity. Furthermore, there was a distinct closed chain ankle DF ROM difference between the "behind" and "beyond" SADS nominal scores.
The SADS can be used as a quick and efficient closed chain ankle DF ROM screen.
2b.
踝关节背屈受限与踝关节扭伤及其他下肢损伤相关。在运动环境中,目前的踝关节测量操作起来可能很繁琐。
本研究旨在确定一种新型闭链踝关节背屈活动度测试——站立位踝关节背屈筛查(SADS)的可靠性和区分效度。
可靠性和效度研究。
37名健康受试者参与本研究。两名评估者使用改良弓步姿势和电子倾角仪测量闭链踝关节背屈活动度(ROM)。四名评估者使用SADS测量踝关节背屈。分别使用组内相关系数(ICC)和kappa系数计算评估者使用电子倾角仪和SADS量表时的可靠性。采用独立t检验比较SADS中“落后”和“超过”类别与改良弓步测试ROM的差异(<0.05)。
观察到ICC值极佳(0.95 [95% CI (0.92,0.97)])且kappa值较高(0.61 - 0.81),一致性百分比高(86 - 94%)。无论分析的评估者或试验如何,在名义上评为“落后”和“超过”的类别之间,踝关节背屈ROM存在显著差异(落后:41.3°±4.7°;超过:51.8°±标准差6.1°,<0.001)。
观察到SADS具有出色的评估者间可靠性和高区分效度。此外,在SADS名义评分的“落后”和“超过”之间,闭链踝关节背屈ROM存在明显差异。
SADS可作为一种快速有效的闭链踝关节背屈ROM筛查方法。
2b。