• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sex differences in outcomes following less-invasive left ventricular assist device implantation.微创左心室辅助装置植入术后结局的性别差异。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar;10(2):255-267. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-cfmcs-21.
2
Is there a sex gap in outcomes of comparable patients supported with left ventricular assist devices?在接受左心室辅助装置支持的可比患者中,是否存在性别结果差异?
Artif Organs. 2022 Nov;46(11):2293-2303. doi: 10.1111/aor.14333. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Minimally invasive surgery improves outcome of left ventricular assist device surgery in cardiogenic shock.微创手术改善心源性休克患者左心室辅助装置手术的预后。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1696-S1702. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.27.
4
Less invasive left ventricular assist device implantation may reduce right ventricular failure.微创左心室辅助装置植入术可能会降低右心室衰竭的发生率。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Oct 1;29(4):592-598. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz143.
5
Less invasive surgical implant strategy and right heart failure after LVAD implantation.左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后微创外科植入策略与右心衰竭。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Apr;40(4):289-297. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Comparative Study.微创左心室辅助装置植入术:一项对比研究。
Artif Organs. 2018 Dec;42(12):1125-1131. doi: 10.1111/aor.13269. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
7
Minimally invasive surgery for left ventricular assist device implantation is safe and associated with a decreased risk of right ventricular failure.左心室辅助装置植入的微创手术是安全的,且与右心室衰竭风险降低相关。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1496-1506. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.32.
8
Racial and Sex Inequities in the Use of and Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Among Medicare Beneficiaries.在 Medicare 受益人群中,左心室辅助装置植入术后的使用和结局存在种族和性别不平等。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2223080. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23080.
9
Cardiac recovery following left ventricular assist device therapy: experience of complete device explantation including ventricular patch plasty.左心室辅助装置治疗后的心脏恢复:完全装置取出术,包括心室补片成形术的经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 29;59(4):855-862. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa461.
10
First results of HeartWare left ventricular assist device implantation with tunnelling of the outflow graft through the transverse sinus.经横窦进行流出道移植物隧道化植入HeartWare左心室辅助装置的初步结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;25(4):503-508. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx124.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex-Specific Differences in Heart Failure: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, Management, and Outcomes.心力衰竭的性别差异:病理生理学、危险因素、管理和结局。
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Apr;37(4):560-571. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.12.025. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
2
Expert Consensus Paper: Lateral Thoracotomy for Centrifugal Ventricular Assist Device Implant.专家共识文件:离心式心室辅助装置植入的侧开胸术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Nov;112(5):1687-1697. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.063. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Thoracotomy Approach for the Implantation of a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device.胸腔镜下心室辅助装置植入术的成本效益分析
ASAIO J. 2020 Aug;66(8):855-861. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001209.
4
Sex Differences in Patients Receiving Left Ventricular Assist Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure.接受左心室辅助装置治疗终末期心力衰竭患者的性别差异。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;8(9):770-779. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
5
Cost of Thoracotomy Approach: An Analysis of the LATERAL Trial.胸腔镜手术入路的成本:LATERAL 试验分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Nov;110(5):1512-1519. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.047. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
6
Long-Term Survival of Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Receiving an Left Ventricular Assist Device Intended as a Bridge to Transplantation: The Registry to Evaluate the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist System.左心室辅助装置桥接移植治疗晚期心力衰竭患者的长期生存:HeartWare 左心室辅助系统评估登记研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Mar;13(3):e006252. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006252. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
Minimally invasive left ventricular assist device implantation: optimizing device design for this approach.微创左心室辅助装置植入术:优化该方法的装置设计。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Apr;17(4):323-330. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1735358. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
8
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2019 Annual Report: The Changing Landscape of Devices and Indications.胸外科医生协会 Intermacs 2019 年度报告:设备和适应证的变化格局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.005.
9
Sex, not gender. A plea for accuracy.是生理性别,而非社会性别。呼吁用词准确。
Exp Mol Med. 2019 Nov 8;51(11):1. doi: 10.1038/s12276-019-0341-0.
10
Implantation of a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device using a sternal-sparing surgical technique.采用胸骨保留手术技术植入全磁悬浮左心室辅助装置。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Jan;39(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Sep 25.

微创左心室辅助装置植入术后结局的性别差异。

Sex differences in outcomes following less-invasive left ventricular assist device implantation.

作者信息

Mariani Silvia, Li Tong, Bounader Karl, Boethig Dietmar, Schöde Alexandra, Hanke Jasmin S, Michaelis Jana, Napp L Christian, Berliner Dominik, Dogan Guenes, Lorusso Roberto, Haverich Axel, Schmitto Jan D

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar;10(2):255-267. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-cfmcs-21.

DOI:10.21037/acs-2020-cfmcs-21
PMID:33842220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8033266/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Worse outcomes in women compared to men undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remain an underestimated problem in heart failure (HF) patients. With device miniaturization, less-invasive LVAD implantation techniques have gained relevance, but their impact on outcomes in women is unknown. This study investigates sex-related differences in patients undergoing LVAD implantation through less-invasive procedures.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who underwent isolated LVAD implantation between 2011 and 2018 through less-invasive techniques. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to balance preoperative heterogeneity. Primary endpoint was two-year survival, and secondary endpoints included long-term survival, surgical outcomes and postoperative adverse events.

RESULTS

Baseline analysis of 191 patients (females 18.3%) showed differences in terms of age [female (median, 52; IQR, 47-61); male (median, 58.5; IQR, 49-66); P=0.005], underlying diagnosis (P<0.001), INTERMACS profile (P=0.009), history of previous cardiac surgery (P=0.049) and preoperative creatinine values [female (median, 110; IQR, 71-146); male (median, 126; IQR, 9-168); P=0.049]. Over a follow-up of 460.68 patient-years, Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed better survival in females (P=0.027) and a similar probability of cardiac transplantation (P=0.288). After PSM, females showed higher needs for intraoperative fresh frozen plasma (P=0.044) and platelets (P=0.001) but comparable postoperative outcomes. No sex-related differences were noticed regarding two-year outcomes, long-term survival and adverse events. LVAD-related infections remained the most common complication with males experiencing more pump infections than women (P=0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving less-invasive LVAD implantation do not show significant sex-related differences in short and long-term outcomes and survival. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the role of less-invasive techniques in reducing sex-based disparities after LVAD implantation.

摘要

背景

与接受左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入的男性相比,女性患者预后较差仍是心力衰竭(HF)患者中一个被低估的问题。随着设备小型化,侵入性较小的LVAD植入技术变得越来越重要,但其对女性患者预后的影响尚不清楚。本研究调查了通过侵入性较小的手术接受LVAD植入的患者的性别差异。

方法

这项回顾性单中心队列研究纳入了2011年至2018年间通过侵入性较小的技术接受孤立LVAD植入的患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡术前异质性。主要终点是两年生存率,次要终点包括长期生存率、手术结果和术后不良事件。

结果

对191例患者(女性占18.3%)的基线分析显示,在年龄方面存在差异[女性(中位数,52岁;四分位数间距,47 - 61岁);男性(中位数,58.5岁;四分位数间距,49 - 66岁);P = 0.005]、潜在诊断(P < 0.001)、INTERMACS分型(P = 0.009)、既往心脏手术史(P = 0.049)和术前肌酐值[女性(中位数,110;四分位数间距,71 - 146);男性(中位数,126;四分位数间距,9 - 168);P = 0.049]。在460.68患者年的随访中,Kaplan - Meyer分析显示女性生存率更高(P = 0.027),心脏移植概率相似(P = 0.288)。PSM后,女性术中对新鲜冰冻血浆(P = 0.044)和血小板(P = 0.001)的需求更高,但术后结果相当。在两年结局、长期生存率和不良事件方面未发现性别差异。LVAD相关感染仍然是最常见的并发症,男性的泵感染比女性更多(P = 0.050)。

结论

接受侵入性较小的LVAD植入的患者在短期和长期结局及生存率方面未显示出明显性别差异。需要进行前瞻性研究来评估侵入性较小的技术在减少LVAD植入后基于性别的差异方面的作用。