• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸腔镜下心室辅助装置植入术的成本效益分析

Cost-Effectiveness of Thoracotomy Approach for the Implantation of a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device.

机构信息

From the Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Maywood, IL.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2020 Aug;66(8):855-861. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001209.

DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000001209
PMID:32740343
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7386860/
Abstract

This study reports the first analysis regarding cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation via thoracotomy. Cost-effectiveness of LVADs implanted via the traditional surgical approach of sternotomy has been improved through the years because of technological advances, along with understanding the importance of patient selection and postimplant management have on positively affecting outcomes. Given the positive clinical outcomes of the thoracotomy approach, we seek to study the cost-effectiveness of a centrifugal LVAD via this less invasive approach. We developed a Markov model. Survival and quality of life inputs (QALY) for the LVAD arm were based on data from the LATERAL clinical trial. For the Medical Management arm, survival was derived from the Seattle Heart Failure Model. The heart transplant probability was derived from INTERMACS. Survival after heart transplantation used International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation data. Cost inputs were calculated based on Medicare data and past literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was found to be $64,632 per quality adjusted life year and $57,891 per life year in the bridge to transplant indication. These results demonstrate further improvement in the overall cost-effectiveness of LVAD therapy and confirm implantation of LVADs via a less invasive approach as being cost-effective.

摘要

这项研究报告了首例关于经胸切开术植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的成本效益分析。由于技术进步,以及对患者选择和植入后管理对积极影响结果的重要性的认识,经胸骨切开术的传统手术方法植入的 LVAD 的成本效益得到了改善。鉴于经胸切开术方法的积极临床结果,我们试图通过这种微创方法研究离心 LVAD 的成本效益。我们开发了一个马尔可夫模型。LVAD 臂的生存和生活质量(QALY)输入基于 LATERAL 临床试验的数据。对于医疗管理臂,生存来自西雅图心力衰竭模型。心脏移植概率来自 INTERMACS。心脏移植后的生存使用国际心肺移植学会的数据。成本输入是根据医疗保险数据和过去的文献计算的。在桥接移植适应证中,增量成本效益比为每质量调整生命年 64632 美元,每生命年 57891 美元。这些结果进一步证明了 LVAD 治疗的总体成本效益得到了改善,并证实了通过微创方法植入 LVAD 的成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d3/7386860/c0603f03e44d/mat-66-855-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d3/7386860/aaf04b0870fb/mat-66-855-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d3/7386860/4d85c0bf308b/mat-66-855-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d3/7386860/8d245ff75ac3/mat-66-855-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d3/7386860/c0603f03e44d/mat-66-855-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d3/7386860/aaf04b0870fb/mat-66-855-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d3/7386860/4d85c0bf308b/mat-66-855-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d3/7386860/8d245ff75ac3/mat-66-855-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42d3/7386860/c0603f03e44d/mat-66-855-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Thoracotomy Approach for the Implantation of a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device.胸腔镜下心室辅助装置植入术的成本效益分析
ASAIO J. 2020 Aug;66(8):855-861. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001209.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of a Small Intrapericardial Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device.心包内小型离心式左心室辅助装置的成本效益。
ASAIO J. 2020 Aug;66(8):862-870. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001211.
3
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation.终末期心力衰竭患者使用左心室辅助装置的临床疗效及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov;9(45):1-132, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9450.
4
Impact of thoracotomy approach on right ventricular failure and length of stay in left ventricular assist device implants: an intermacs registry analysis.胸腔切开术对左心室辅助装置植入患者右心衰竭和住院时间的影响:Intermacs 注册分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Sep;40(9):981-989. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Ambulatory Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.心力衰竭终末期患者经皮植入左心室辅助装置的成本效益分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Feb;5(2):110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
6
Cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for patients with advanced heart failure: analysis of the British NHS bridge to transplant (BTT) program.左心室辅助装置(LVADs)治疗晚期心力衰竭患者的成本效益:英国国民保健制度桥接移植(BTT)计划分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Feb 15;171(3):338-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.015. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
7
Economic Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Patients With End Stage Heart Failure Who Are Ineligible for Cardiac Transplantation.左心室辅助设备用于不符合心脏移植条件的终末期心力衰竭患者的经济学评价。
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Oct;33(10):1283-1291. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Evaluation of a lateral thoracotomy implant approach for a centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device: The LATERAL clinical trial.经外侧开胸入路植入离心式左心室辅助装置的评估:LATERAL 临床试验。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Apr;38(4):344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.02.002.
9
Robotic Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Using Left Thoracotomy Approach in Patients with Previous Sternotomies.采用左胸廓切开术入路对曾行胸骨切开术的患者植入机器人左心室辅助装置
ASAIO J. 2015 Nov-Dec;61(6):e44-6. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000251.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy.连续血流左心室辅助装置作为终末期心力衰竭治疗的成本效果分析。
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Jan;5(1):10-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.962951. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The economics of heart failure care.心力衰竭治疗的经济学。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jan-Feb;82:90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.010. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
2
Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Primer For the General Cardiologist.左心室辅助装置:心内科医生入门指南。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e027251. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027251. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
3
Sternum-Sparing Left Ventricular Assist Device Insertion Reduces Perioperative Transfusions and Blood Loss: A Single-Centre Canadian Experience.保留胸骨的左心室辅助装置植入术可减少围手术期输血和失血:加拿大单中心经验

本文引用的文献

1
"Unintended" Consequences of Changes in Heart Transplant Allocation Policy: Impact on Practice Patterns.心脏移植分配政策变化的“意外”后果:对实践模式的影响
ASAIO J. 2020 Feb;66(2):125-127. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001128.
2
An early investigation of outcomes with the new 2018 donor heart allocation system in the United States.美国2018年新型供体心脏分配系统的早期结果调查。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Jan;39(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
3
Evaluation of a lateral thoracotomy implant approach for a centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device: The LATERAL clinical trial.
CJC Open. 2022 Jun 9;4(10):833-839. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.06.002. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Innovations in implantation techniques of ventricular assist devices.心室辅助装置植入技术的创新。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Oct 16;8:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.047. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Economic Issues in Heart Failure in the United States.美国心力衰竭的经济学问题。
J Card Fail. 2022 Mar;28(3):453-466. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.12.017. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
6
Cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy in the United Kingdom.英国左心室辅助装置作为终末期心衰治疗的成本效益分析
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):3049-3057. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13401. Epub 2021 May 27.
7
Sex differences in outcomes following less-invasive left ventricular assist device implantation.微创左心室辅助装置植入术后结局的性别差异。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar;10(2):255-267. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-cfmcs-21.
经外侧开胸入路植入离心式左心室辅助装置的评估:LATERAL 临床试验。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Apr;38(4):344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.02.002.
4
HVAD: The ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial.HVAD:ENDURANCE 补充试验。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Sep;6(9):792-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2018年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2018 Mar 20;137(12):e67-e492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Eighth annual INTERMACS report: Special focus on framing the impact of adverse events.第八年度 INTERMACS 报告:特别关注不良事件影响的构建。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Oct;36(10):1080-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
7
Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results.在门诊心力衰竭患者中左心室辅助装置和药物治疗的风险评估和比较效果:ROADMAP 研究 2 年结果。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;5(7):518-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
8
Intrapericardial Left Ventricular Assist Device for Advanced Heart Failure.经心室内左心室辅助装置治疗晚期心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):451-460. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602954.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Solitaire Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results From the SWIFT-PRIME Trial (Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke).Solitaire支架取栓术治疗急性缺血性卒中的成本效益:SWIFT-PRIME试验(以取栓术为急性缺血性卒中主要血管内治疗手段的Solitaire)结果
Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):379-387. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014735. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Ambulatory Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.心力衰竭终末期患者经皮植入左心室辅助装置的成本效益分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Feb;5(2):110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Dec 21.