• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

出版信息

Cardiol J. 2022;29(4):563-573. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0040. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

DOI:10.5603/CJ.a2021.0040
PMID:33843041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9273238/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were considered to be beneficial for coronary bifurcation lesions regarding the avoidance of lateral branch opening incarceration after complete absorption. However, data is limited in this setting. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the short (6-month) and medium-term (1-year) outcomes of BRS in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane library databases were searched to find the studies of BRS implantation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. The effective outcome was target lesion revascularization. The safety outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, definite or probable scaffold thrombosis, and cardiac death.

RESULTS

A total of 1204 patients involved in 12 studies were included. The pooled estimate rate of target lesion revascularization as efficacy outcome was highly consistent between 6-month and 1-year follow-up, which was 4.74% (95% CI 2.36-9.54%, I² = 41.5%, p = 0.14) and 4.37% (95% CI 3.05-5.69%, I² = 4.6%, P = 0.39). The pooled estimated rate of major adverse cardiovascular events as safety outcome was 5.50% and 7.31% for both 6-month and 1-year follow-up. The pooled estimated rate of target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, definite or probable scaffold thrombosis, and cardiac death at 1-year follow-up was 5.92%, 2.52%, 1.69%, and 0.42%.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of BRS for coronary bifurcation lesions is acceptable in efficacy outcome, but the high rate of scaffold thrombosis remains of concern (Registered by PROSPERO, CRD42019140341).

摘要

背景

生物可吸收支架(BRS)被认为在避免完全吸收后侧支开口嵌顿时对冠状动脉分叉病变有益。然而,在这种情况下的数据有限。本荟萃分析的目的是评估冠状动脉分叉病变患者使用 BRS 的短期(6 个月)和中期(1 年)结果。

方法

检索 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆数据库,以找到冠状动脉分叉病变患者植入 BRS 的研究。有效结果是靶病变血运重建。安全性结果包括主要不良心血管事件、靶血管血运重建、心肌梗死、明确或可能的支架血栓形成和心脏死亡。

结果

共有 1204 例患者纳入 12 项研究。6 个月和 1 年随访时,靶病变血运重建的汇总估计发生率在疗效结果方面非常一致,分别为 4.74%(95%CI 2.36-9.54%,I²=41.5%,p=0.14)和 4.37%(95%CI 3.05-5.69%,I²=4.6%,P=0.39)。安全性结果中主要不良心血管事件的汇总估计发生率为 6 个月和 1 年随访时分别为 5.50%和 7.31%。1 年随访时靶血管血运重建、心肌梗死、明确或可能的支架血栓形成和心脏死亡的汇总估计发生率分别为 5.92%、2.52%、1.69%和 0.42%。

结论

BRS 应用于冠状动脉分叉病变在疗效结果方面是可以接受的,但支架血栓形成的高发生率仍令人担忧(由 PROSPERO 注册,CRD42019140341)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c1d/9273238/be6d4434c35e/cardj-29-4-563f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c1d/9273238/d3a34fa9a0f5/cardj-29-4-563f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c1d/9273238/be6d4434c35e/cardj-29-4-563f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c1d/9273238/d3a34fa9a0f5/cardj-29-4-563f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c1d/9273238/be6d4434c35e/cardj-29-4-563f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiol J. 2022;29(4):563-573. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0040. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
2
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation for the treatment of bifurcation lesions - Implications from early clinical experience during daily practice.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架植入术治疗分叉病变——日常实践中早期临床经验的启示
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;17(5):313-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
3
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: the midterm follow-up of the prospective ABSORB DM Benelux study.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架治疗糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病:前瞻性 ABSORB DM 比荷卢研究的中期随访。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 9;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0827-z.
4
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.长期疗效和安全性的依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005286.
5
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):537-544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00979-4. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
6
Preliminary Report of Clinical Outcomes After Single Crossover Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation Without Routine Side Branch Strut Dilation.单交叉生物可吸收支架植入且不进行常规侧支支柱扩张后的临床结果初步报告
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 15;88(6):865-870. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26586. Epub 2016 May 24.
7
1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的1年结局:GHOST-EU和XIENCE V美国注册研究的倾向匹配比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.042. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
8
Very long-term follow-up of patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with bioresorbable scaffolds.生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变患者的长期随访。
Kardiol Pol. 2022;80(3):302-306. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0031. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
9
Clinical outcomes following bifurcation double-stenting with bioresorbable scaffolds.生物可吸收支架分叉双支架置入后的临床结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 15;88(6):854-862. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26579. Epub 2016 May 17.
10
Scaffold Thrombosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With ABSORB Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 ABSORB 生物可吸收血管支架内血栓形成:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 11;9(1):12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.024.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold technology in treating coronary bifurcation lesions: A report about long-term clinical results and review of available literature.生物可吸收血管支架技术在治疗冠状动脉分叉病变中的应用:关于长期临床结果的报告及现有文献综述。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2019;120(8):545-551. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2019_088.
2
Procedural findings and early healing response after implantation of a self-apposing bioresorbable scaffold in coronary bifurcation lesions.自贴壁生物可吸收支架植入冠状动脉分叉病变后的手术结果及早期愈合反应
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;35(7):1199-1210. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01537-5. Epub 2019 May 4.
3
Angiographic and Midterm Outcomes of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
冠状动脉分叉病变生物可吸收血管支架的血管造影及中期结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 15;122(12):2035-2042. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
4
Blinded outcomes and angina assessment of coronary bioresorbable scaffolds: 30-day and 1-year results from the ABSORB IV randomised trial.冠状动脉生物可吸收支架的盲法结局和心绞痛评估:ABSORB IV 随机试验的 30 天和 1 年结果。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1530-1540. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32283-9. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
5
Considerations for the choice between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention as revascularization strategies in major categories of patients with stable multivessel coronary artery disease: an accompanying article of the task force of the 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization.稳定型多支冠状动脉疾病主要类别患者选择冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗作为血运重建策略的考量:2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南工作组的附文
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):204-212. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy532.
6
A Randomized Trial Comparing the NeoVas Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stents.随机对照试验比较新一代雷帕霉素洗脱生物可吸收支架和金属依维莫司洗脱支架
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 12;11(3):260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.037.
7
Bench testing and coronary artery bifurcations: a consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club.冠状动脉分叉病变的体外测试:来自欧洲分叉俱乐部的共识文件。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Feb 2;13(15):e1794-e1803. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00270.
8
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds implanted in coronary bifurcation lesions: Impact of polymeric wide struts on side-branch impairment.植入冠状动脉分叉病变的依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架:聚合物宽支撑对分支损伤的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 15;221:656-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.153. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
9
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold use for coronary bifurcation lesions: A substudy from GHOST EU registry.生物可吸收血管支架用于冠状动脉分叉病变:来自GHOST EU注册研究的一项子研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan;89(1):47-56. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26634. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
10
Preliminary Report of Clinical Outcomes After Single Crossover Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation Without Routine Side Branch Strut Dilation.单交叉生物可吸收支架植入且不进行常规侧支支柱扩张后的临床结果初步报告
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 15;88(6):865-870. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26586. Epub 2016 May 24.