• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变患者的长期随访。

Very long-term follow-up of patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with bioresorbable scaffolds.

机构信息

1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

Kardiol Pol. 2022;80(3):302-306. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0031. Epub 2022 Feb 3.

DOI:10.33963/KP.a2022.0031
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

The data concerning the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in coronary bifurcation lesions are limited.

AIMS

The objective of the study was to evaluate the early and very long-term clinical outcomes of bifurcation stenting with ABSORB BVS.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with BVS were included. A total of 124 BVS were implanted. Provisional side branch stenting was performed in 66 patients, distal main stenting in 14 patients, systematic T stenting in 2, and T with minimal protrusion (TAP) in 5 patients. Side branch ostial stenting was performed in additional 12 patients.

RESULTS

The procedural success was achieved in 98% of patients. In long-term follow-up, the rate of cardiac death was 4.0%, target vessel myocardial infarction was 5.0%, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 11%. The cumulative incidence of definite/probable scaffold thrombosis (ST) was 2% at long-term follow-up. Comparison with the historical drug-eluting stents (DES) group revealed higher mortality and major adverse cardiac events rate in the ABSORB group.

CONCLUSIONS

Stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions of low-to-moderate complexity with BVS was feasible with good acute performance and acceptable results. However, the risk of death and major adverse cardiovascular events was higher as compared with DES.

摘要

背景

关于生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)在冠状动脉分叉病变中应用的数据有限。

目的

本研究旨在评估 ABSORB BVS 分叉支架置入术的早期和极长期临床结果。

方法

纳入 100 例接受 BVS 治疗的冠状动脉分叉病变患者。共植入 124 个 BVS。66 例患者行临时分支支架术,14 例患者行远端主干支架术,2 例行系统 T 支架术,5 例行 T 支架伴最小突出(TAP)术。另外 12 例患者行分支开口支架术。

结果

98%的患者获得了手术成功。长期随访中,心脏死亡发生率为 4.0%,靶血管心肌梗死发生率为 5.0%,靶血管血运重建(TVR)发生率为 11%。长期随访中,确定/可能的支架血栓形成(ST)的累积发生率为 2%。与药物洗脱支架(DES)的历史数据相比,ABSORB 组的死亡率和主要不良心脏事件发生率更高。

结论

低-中度复杂程度的冠状动脉分叉病变用 BVS 支架置入术是可行的,急性效果良好,结果可接受。然而,与 DES 相比,死亡和主要不良心血管事件的风险更高。

相似文献

1
Very long-term follow-up of patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with bioresorbable scaffolds.生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变患者的长期随访。
Kardiol Pol. 2022;80(3):302-306. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0031. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
2
Mid-term clinical outcomes of ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting stent for coronary bifurcation lesions.ABSBORB 生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的中期临床结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;246:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.123.
3
The absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold in coronary bifurcations: insights from bench testing.冠状动脉分叉处的可吸收生物可吸收血管支架:来自实验室测试的观察。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
4
A hybrid strategy with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and drug eluting stents for treating complex coronary lesions.一种采用生物可吸收血管支架和药物洗脱支架治疗复杂冠状动脉病变的混合策略。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;18(5S1):S4-S9. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:倾向评分匹配比较的 1 年结果:BVS-EXAMINATION 研究(生物可吸收血管支架——依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.005.
6
Long-term outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffold in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.生物可吸收血管支架在ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的长期预后
Acta Cardiol. 2018 Jun;73(3):276-281. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1380767. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
7
The COBRA II (COmplex Bifurcation lesions: RAndomized comparison of a fully bioresorbable modified-T stenting strategy versus bifurcation reconstruction with a dedicated self-expanding stent in combination with bioresorbable scaffolds) study: Final 5-year follow-up.COBRA II 研究:最终 5 年随访。(COmplex Bifurcation lesions: RAndomized comparison of a fully bioresorbable modified-T stenting strategy versus bifurcation reconstruction with a dedicated self-expanding stent in combination with bioresorbable scaffolds)
Indian Heart J. 2023 Nov-Dec;75(6):473-476. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
8
Clinical outcomes following bifurcation double-stenting with bioresorbable scaffolds.生物可吸收支架分叉双支架置入后的临床结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 15;88(6):854-862. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26579. Epub 2016 May 17.
9
Mid- to long-term outcome of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Data of the BVS registry Göttingen predominantly from ACS patients.接受依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗患者的中长期结局:哥廷根生物可吸收血管支架注册研究数据,主要来自急性冠状动脉综合征患者。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 May 1;234:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.069. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
10
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.长期疗效和安全性的依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005286.

引用本文的文献

1
Magnesium bioresorbable scaffold (Magmaris) versus polymer biodegradable ultrathin drug-eluting stent (Ultimaster) in acute coronary syndrome. Mid-term outcomes (2 years).急性冠状动脉综合征中镁生物可吸收支架(Magmaris)与聚合物可生物降解超薄药物洗脱支架(Ultimaster)的比较。中期结果(2年)
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024 Mar;20(1):67-75. doi: 10.5114/aic.2024.136901. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
2
The COBRA II (COmplex Bifurcation lesions: RAndomized comparison of a fully bioresorbable modified-T stenting strategy versus bifurcation reconstruction with a dedicated self-expanding stent in combination with bioresorbable scaffolds) study: Final 5-year follow-up.COBRA II 研究:最终 5 年随访。(COmplex Bifurcation lesions: RAndomized comparison of a fully bioresorbable modified-T stenting strategy versus bifurcation reconstruction with a dedicated self-expanding stent in combination with bioresorbable scaffolds)
Indian Heart J. 2023 Nov-Dec;75(6):473-476. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
Mid-term safety and efficacy of magnesium bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - magmaris in diabetic population. 2-Years outcome in acute coronary syndrome cohort.镁可吸收血管支架(Magmaris)在糖尿病患者中的中期安全性和疗效。急性冠脉综合征队列的 2 年结果。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2023 Jul-Aug;20(4):14791641231188705. doi: 10.1177/14791641231188705.
4
Nanotechnology in interventional cardiology: A state-of-the-art review.介入心脏病学中的纳米技术:最新综述。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Nov 18;43:101149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101149. eCollection 2022 Dec.