Suppr超能文献

2017 年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎临时分类标准在秘鲁三级保健中心的表现。

Performance of the 2017 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Provisional Classification Criteria for Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis in a Peruvian Tertiary Care Center.

机构信息

From the Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima.

出版信息

J Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Mar 1;28(2):e397-e400. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001741.

Abstract

AIM

To validate the new classification criteria for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis in a real-life Peruvian cohort of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis patients.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records from a Peruvian tertiary care center from January 1990 to December 2019. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis was diagnosed based on the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, the 2012 Chapel Hill Consensus Conference definitions, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) algorithm, and the clinical acumen of the treating rheumatologists. We classified all patients using the "former criteria" (the 1990 ACR criteria for granulomatosis with polyangiitis [GPA] and eosinophilic GPA [EGPA] and the 1994 Chapel Hill Consensus Conference definition for microscopic polyangiitis [MPA]), the EMEA algorithm, and the "new criteria" (the 2017 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism Provisional Criteria). The level of agreement (using Cohen κ) was calculated using the clinical diagnosis as the criterion standard.

RESULTS

We identified 212 patients, 12 of whom were excluded. One hundred fifty-four (77%) had MPA, 41 (20.5%) GPA, and 5 (2.5%) EGPA. The new criteria performed well for MPA (κ = 0.713) and EGPA (κ = 0.659), whereas the EMEA algorithm performed well for GPA (κ = 0.938). In the overall population, the new criteria showed better agreement (κ = 0.653) than the EMEA algorithm (κ = 0.506) and the former criteria (κ = 0.305).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2017 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism Provisional Criteria showed better agreement for the clinical diagnosis of all the patients overall and had the best performance for MPA and EGPA. The EMEA algorithm had the best performance for GPA.

摘要

目的

在秘鲁的抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎患者真实队列中验证新的抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎分类标准。

方法

我们回顾了 1990 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月秘鲁一家三级保健中心的病历。抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎的诊断基于 1990 年美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准、2012 年 Chapel Hill 共识会议定义、欧洲药品管理局(EMEA)算法和治疗风湿病学家的临床判断。我们使用“旧标准”(1990 年 ACR 用于肉芽肿性多血管炎[GPA]和嗜酸性粒细胞性 GPA[EGPA]的标准和 1994 年 Chapel Hill 共识会议用于显微镜下多血管炎[MPA]的定义)、EMEA 算法和“新标准”(2017 年 ACR/欧洲抗风湿病联盟临时标准)对所有患者进行分类。使用临床诊断作为标准,计算一致性(使用 Cohen κ)。

结果

我们共确定了 212 名患者,其中 12 名被排除。154 名(77%)为 MPA,41 名(20.5%)为 GPA,5 名(2.5%)为 EGPA。新标准在 MPA(κ=0.713)和 EGPA(κ=0.659)方面表现良好,而 EMEA 算法在 GPA(κ=0.938)方面表现良好。在整个人群中,新标准的一致性(κ=0.653)优于 EMEA 算法(κ=0.506)和旧标准(κ=0.305)。

结论

2017 年 ACR/欧洲抗风湿病联盟临时标准对所有患者的临床诊断具有更好的一致性,对 MPA 和 EGPA 的诊断性能最佳。EMEA 算法对 GPA 的诊断性能最佳。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验