Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Japan.
Department of Nephrology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Mod Rheumatol. 2023 Dec 22;34(1):144-150. doi: 10.1093/mr/road017.
The objective of this study was to compare the American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology 2022 criteria with the previous classification algorithm for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
We used data from two nationwide, prospective, inception cohort studies. The enrolled patients were classified as having eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) according to the new criteria; these criteria were compared with Watts' algorithm.
Among 477 patients, 10.7%, 9.9%, and 75.6% were classified as having EGPA, GPA, and MPA, respectively; 6.1% were unclassifiable. Three patients met both the EGPA and MPA criteria, and eight patients met both the GPA and MPA criteria. Of 78 patients with GPA classified using Watts' algorithm, 27 (34.6%) patients were reclassified as having MPA. Ear, nose, and throat involvement was significantly less frequent in patients reclassified as having MPA than in those reclassified as having GPA. Of 73 patients unclassifiable using Watts' algorithm, 62 were reclassified as having MPA. All patients reclassified as having MPA were myeloperoxidase-anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive, and 46 had interstitial lung disease.
Although the American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology 2022 criteria cause overlapping multiple criteria fulfilments in some patients, those items contribute to classifying unclassifiable patients using Watts' algorithm into MPA.
本研究旨在比较美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟 2022 年标准与抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎的先前分类算法。
我们使用了两项全国性、前瞻性、发病队列研究的数据。根据新标准,纳入的患者被分为嗜酸性肉芽肿性多血管炎(EGPA)、肉芽肿性多血管炎(GPA)或显微镜下多血管炎(MPA);这些标准与 Watts 算法进行了比较。
在 477 例患者中,分别有 10.7%、9.9%和 75.6%被归类为 EGPA、GPA 和 MPA;6.1%无法分类。有 3 例患者同时符合 EGPA 和 MPA 标准,8 例患者同时符合 GPA 和 MPA 标准。在使用 Watts 算法分类的 78 例 GPA 患者中,有 27 例(34.6%)患者被重新归类为 MPA。与重新归类为 GPA 的患者相比,重新归类为 MPA 的患者耳部、鼻部和喉部受累明显较少。在使用 Watts 算法无法分类的 73 例患者中,有 62 例被重新归类为 MPA。所有重新归类为 MPA 的患者均为髓过氧化物酶-抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体阳性,且 46 例存在间质性肺病。
尽管美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟 2022 年标准在一些患者中导致多项标准重叠,但这些项目有助于将使用 Watts 算法无法分类的患者归类为 MPA。