Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, C/Profesor Martín Lagos SN, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1970-1978. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08481-3. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the gold standard treatment for unilateral primary aldosteronism. However, satisfactory results have also been published with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The aim of this study was to compare LA and RFA for the treatment of primary aldosteronism.
A retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent LA or RFA in a single center was performed. Morbidity and long-term effectiveness (cure rate and blood pressure control) were analyzed. A multivariate analysis with a propensity score was also performed.
Thirty-four patients were included in the study, 24 in the LA group and 10 in the RFA group. Hypertension had been diagnosed a median of 12 years before the intervention. Hypertension was properly controlled before the intervention in 55.9% of the patients. Hypertensive crisis was more common during RFA (4.2% vs. 70.0%, p < 0.001), although no patient suffered any complication because of these crises. LA was longer (174.6 vs. 105.5 min, p = 0.001) and had a longer length of stay (median 2 vs 1 days, p < 0.001). No severe complications were observed in any of the patients. After a median follow-up of 46.2 months, more patients had hypertension cured and blood pressure controlled in the LA group (29.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.078 and 95.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.006, respectively). Also, patients in the LA group were taking less antihypertensive drugs (1.8 vs. 3.0, p = 0.054) or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (41.7% vs. 90.0%, p = 0.020). Multivariate analysis adjusted by propensity score showed that LA had an OR = 11.3 (p = 0.138) for hypertension cure and an OR = 55.1 (p = 0.040) for blood pressure control.
Although RFA was a less invasive procedure than LA, hypertension was cured and blood pressure was properly controlled in more patients from the LA group. Patients who underwent LA were taking less antihypertensive drugs than patients who had undergone RFA.
腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LA)是单侧原发性醛固酮增多症的金标准治疗方法。然而,射频消融(RFA)也取得了令人满意的效果。本研究旨在比较 LA 和 RFA 治疗原发性醛固酮增多症的效果。
对在单中心接受 LA 或 RFA 治疗的患者进行回顾性队列研究。分析发病率和长期疗效(治愈率和血压控制)。还进行了倾向评分的多变量分析。
研究纳入 34 例患者,LA 组 24 例,RFA 组 10 例。干预前中位诊断高血压 12 年。干预前,55.9%的患者高血压得到适当控制。RFA 期间更常见高血压危象(4.2%比 70.0%,p<0.001),尽管没有患者因这些危象而发生任何并发症。LA 手术时间较长(174.6 比 105.5 分钟,p=0.001),住院时间也较长(中位数 2 比 1 天,p<0.001)。任何患者均未观察到严重并发症。中位随访 46.2 个月后,LA 组更多患者高血压得到治愈且血压得到控制(29.2%比 0%,p=0.078 和 95.5%比 50.0%,p=0.006)。此外,LA 组患者服用的降压药(1.8 比 3.0,p=0.054)或盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(41.7%比 90.0%,p=0.020)更少。通过倾向评分调整的多变量分析显示,LA 对高血压治愈的 OR=11.3(p=0.138),对血压控制的 OR=55.1(p=0.040)。
虽然 RFA 比 LA 具有侵袭性小的优势,但 LA 组更多患者高血压得到治愈,血压得到更好控制。LA 组患者服用的降压药少于 RFA 组。