Thrombosis and Haemostasis Unit, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", Viale Cappuccini, S. Giovanni Rotondo, 71013, Foggia, Italy.
Ob/Gyn Department of The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Oct;52(3):772-778. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02429-z. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
It is still debated whether prophylactic doses of low-molecular- weight heparin (LMWH) are always effective in preventing Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and mortality in COVID-19. Furthermore, there is paucity of data for those patients not requiring ventilation. We explored mortality and the safety/efficacy profile of LMWH in a cohort of Italian patients with COVID-19 who did not undergo ventilation. From the initial cohort of 422 patients, 264 were enrolled. Most (n = 156, 87.7%) received standard LMWH prophylaxis during hospitalization, with no significant difference between medical wards and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Major or not major but clinically relevant hemorrhages were recorded in 13 (4.9%) patients: twelve in those taking prophylactic LMWH and one in a patient taking oral anticoagulants (p: n.s.). Thirty-nine patients (14.8%) with median age 75 years. were transfused. Hemoglobin (Hb) at admission was significantly lower in transfused patients and Hb at admission inversely correlated with the number of red blood cells units transfused (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality occurred in 76 (28.8%) patients, 46 (24.3%) of whom admitted to medical wards. Furthermore, Hb levels at admittance were significantly lower in fatalities (g/dl 12.3; IQR 2.4 vs. 13.3; IQR 2.8; Mann-Whitney U-test; p = 0.001). After the exclusion of patients treated by LMWH intermediate or therapeutic doses (n = 32), the logistic regression showed that prophylaxis significantly and independently reduced mortality (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.85). Present data show that COVID-19 patients who do not require ventilation benefit from prophylactic doses of LMWH.
目前仍存在争议,预防性低分子肝素(LMWH)剂量是否总能有效预防 COVID-19 患者的静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)和死亡率。此外,对于那些不需要通气的患者,数据也很少。我们研究了未接受通气的意大利 COVID-19 患者中 LMWH 的死亡率和安全性/疗效情况。在最初的 422 名患者中,有 264 名入组。大多数患者(n=156,87.7%)在住院期间接受标准 LMWH 预防治疗,其中内科病房和重症监护病房(ICU)之间无显著差异。记录到 13 例(4.9%)患者发生主要或非主要但具有临床意义的出血:12 例接受预防性 LMWH 治疗的患者和 1 例接受口服抗凝剂治疗的患者(p:无统计学差异)。39 例(14.8%)中位年龄 75 岁的患者接受了输血。血红蛋白(Hb)在入院时明显低于输血患者,入院时 Hb 与输注的红细胞单位数呈负相关(p<0.001)。76 例(28.8%)患者发生院内死亡,其中 46 例(24.3%)患者收入内科病房。此外,死亡患者的 Hb 水平明显较低(g/dl 12.3;IQR 2.4 与 13.3;IQR 2.8;Mann-Whitney U 检验;p=0.001)。排除接受 LMWH 中剂量或治疗剂量治疗的患者(n=32)后,逻辑回归显示,预防治疗可显著降低死亡率(OR 0.31,95%CI 0.13-0.85)。目前的数据表明,不需要通气的 COVID-19 患者从预防性 LMWH 剂量中获益。