Krekeler Brittany N, Yee Joanne, Daggett Sarah, Leverson Glen, Rogus-Pulia Nicole
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Department of Surgery-Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin-Madison Clinical Science Center.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 May 11;64(5):1526-1538. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00461. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
Purpose Adherence is a concern in dysphagia management. Poor adherence with recommendations can negatively affect treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. For exercise-based therapies, low adherence can alter the dose of exercise delivered to the muscle, which can diminish impact of exercise. It has been established that low adherence is a problem in dysphagia treatments; however, relationships among levels of adherence and outcomes from exercise-based interventions have not been explored. Method In this retrospective pilot study, data were collected from a multicenter clinical demonstration program in the Veterans Affairs hospital system to examine the relationships between patient adherence with a device-facilitated lingual exercise regimen. Outcomes were compared pre- and posttreatment using a paired test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, and relationships among adherence and outcome measures were evaluated using Pearson or Spearman rank correlation coefficients, as appropriate. Results Patient adherence was evenly distributed across participants: Adherence at the front sensor was 59.3% ( = 28.2), ranging from 5.5% to 95.8%; the back sensor adherence was 55.9% ( = 29.8), ranging from 1.1% to 97.2%. Maximum isometric pressure (MIP) generation, at both the front and back sensors, was increased from pre- to posttreatment ( < .0001, front; = .008, back). Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores were also significantly improved at the posttreatment time point as compared to baseline ( = .005). However, there were no significant correlations among adherence and outcome measures (front sensor adherence vs. ΔMIP, = -.161, = .342; back sensor adherence vs. ΔMIP, = .002, = .991; front sensor adherence vs. ΔFOIS, = -.183, = .279; back sensor adherence vs. ΔFOIS, = -.160, = .399). Conclusions These findings suggest that patient adherence with this lingual exercise program was not related to the increases in lingual pressure generation or improvement in functional oral intake observed in this cohort. These preliminary findings suggest the need for future, prospective, controlled, and randomized clinical trials to further investigate patient adherence with a lingual exercise program and related impacts of adherence on exercise dose and swallowing-related outcomes.
目的 依从性是吞咽困难管理中的一个问题。对建议的依从性差会对治疗效果和患者预后产生负面影响。对于基于运动的疗法,低依从性会改变输送到肌肉的运动量,从而削弱运动的影响。已经确定低依从性是吞咽困难治疗中的一个问题;然而,依从性水平与基于运动的干预措施的结果之间的关系尚未得到探讨。方法 在这项回顾性试点研究中,从退伍军人事务医院系统的一个多中心临床示范项目中收集数据,以检查患者对一种设备辅助舌部运动方案的依从性之间的关系。使用配对t检验或Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验比较治疗前后的结果,并根据情况使用Pearson或Spearman秩相关系数评估依从性与结果指标之间的关系。结果 患者的依从性在参与者中分布均匀:前传感器的依从性为59.3%(标准差 = 28.2),范围从5.5%到95.8%;后传感器的依从性为55.9%(标准差 = 29.8),范围从1.1%到97.2%。在前传感器和后传感器处,最大等长压力(MIP)的产生从治疗前到治疗后均有所增加(前传感器:P <.0001;后传感器:P =.008)。与基线相比,在治疗后时间点功能性口服摄入量量表(FOIS)评分也有显著改善(P =.005)。然而,依从性与结果指标之间没有显著相关性(前传感器依从性与MIP变化量:r = -.161,P =.342;后传感器依从性与MIP变化量:r =.002,P =.991;前传感器依从性与FOIS变化量:r = -.183,P =.279;后传感器依从性与FOIS变化量:r = -.160,P =.399)。结论 这些发现表明,该队列中患者对这种舌部运动方案的依从性与舌部压力产生的增加或功能性口服摄入量的改善无关。这些初步发现表明,需要未来进行前瞻性、对照和随机临床试验,以进一步研究患者对舌部运动方案的依从性以及依从性对运动量和吞咽相关结果的相关影响。