• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用絮凝剂和悬浮物作为压载物通过沉淀去除供水水库中的蓝藻:以埃塞俄比亚 Legedadi 水库为例。

Removal of cyanobacteria from a water supply reservoir by sedimentation using flocculants and suspended solids as ballast: Case of Legedadi Reservoir (Ethiopia).

机构信息

Center for Environmental Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Department of Zoological Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 12;16(4):e0249720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249720. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0249720
PMID:33844703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8041171/
Abstract

The massive growth of potentially toxic cyanobacteria in water supply reservoirs, such as Legedadi Reservoir (Ethiopia), poses a huge burden to water purification units and represents a serious threat to public health. In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of the flocculants/coagulants chitosan, Moringa oleifera seed (MOS), and poly-aluminium chloride (PAC) in settling cyanobacterial species present in the Legedadi Reservoir. We also tested whether coagulant-treated reservoir water promotes cyanobacteria growth. Our data showed that suspended solids in the turbid reservoir acted as ballast, thereby enhancing settling and hence the removal of cyanobacterial species coagulated with chitosan, Moringa oleifera seed, or their combination. Compared to other coagulants, MOS of 30 mg/L concentration, with the removal efficiency of 93.6%, was the most effective in removing cyanobacterial species without causing cell lysis. Contrary to our expectation, PAC was the least effective coagulant. Moreover, reservoir water treated with MOS alone or MOS combined with chitosan did not support any growth of cyanobacteria during the first two weeks of the experiment. Our data indicate that the efficacy of a flocculant/coagulant in the removal of cyanobacteria is influenced by the uniqueness of individual lakes/reservoirs, implying that mitigation methods should consider the unique characteristic of the lake/reservoir.

摘要

供水水库中潜在有毒蓝藻的大量生长,如 Legedadi 水库(埃塞俄比亚),对水净化单元造成了巨大负担,并对公共健康构成了严重威胁。在这项研究中,我们评估了絮凝剂/混凝剂壳聚糖、辣木籽(MOS)和聚合氯化铝(PAC)在沉淀 Legedadi 水库中存在的蓝藻物种方面的效率。我们还测试了经混凝剂处理的水库水是否会促进蓝藻生长。我们的数据表明,混浊水库中的悬浮固体充当压舱物,从而增强了沉淀,从而去除了与壳聚糖、辣木籽或它们的组合凝结的蓝藻物种。与其他混凝剂相比,浓度为 30mg/L 的 MOS 在去除蓝藻物种而不引起细胞裂解方面最有效,去除效率为 93.6%。与我们的预期相反,PAC 是最无效的混凝剂。此外,在实验的前两周,单独用 MOS 或 MOS 与壳聚糖处理的水库水都没有支持任何蓝藻的生长。我们的数据表明,絮凝剂/混凝剂去除蓝藻的效果受到单个湖泊/水库独特性的影响,这意味着缓解方法应考虑湖泊/水库的独特特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce24/8041171/d0aa1fc3f342/pone.0249720.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce24/8041171/25e8070f21c3/pone.0249720.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce24/8041171/379eb4251e7e/pone.0249720.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce24/8041171/2cbf0f6b46d1/pone.0249720.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce24/8041171/ad78803e7447/pone.0249720.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce24/8041171/d0aa1fc3f342/pone.0249720.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce24/8041171/25e8070f21c3/pone.0249720.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce24/8041171/379eb4251e7e/pone.0249720.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce24/8041171/2cbf0f6b46d1/pone.0249720.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce24/8041171/ad78803e7447/pone.0249720.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce24/8041171/d0aa1fc3f342/pone.0249720.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Removal of cyanobacteria from a water supply reservoir by sedimentation using flocculants and suspended solids as ballast: Case of Legedadi Reservoir (Ethiopia).利用絮凝剂和悬浮物作为压载物通过沉淀去除供水水库中的蓝藻:以埃塞俄比亚 Legedadi 水库为例。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 12;16(4):e0249720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249720. eCollection 2021.
2
Coagulant plus ballast technique provides a rapid mitigation of cyanobacterial nuisance.凝聚剂加助凝剂技术可迅速减轻蓝藻滋扰。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 9;12(6):e0178976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178976. eCollection 2017.
3
Characterisation of coal washery effluent and optimisation of coagulation behaviour of Moringa oleifera seed as a coagulant.洗煤厂废水的特性及辣木籽作为混凝剂的混凝行为优化
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Mar;189(3):133. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5844-3. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
4
Development of a magnetic coagulant based on Moringa oleifera seed extract for water treatment.基于辣木籽提取物的磁性凝固剂的开发及其在水处理中的应用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Apr;23(8):7692-700. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-6029-7. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
5
Pretreatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) using Moringa oleifera seeds as natural coagulant.使用辣木籽作为天然凝聚剂对棕榈油厂废水(POME)进行预处理。
J Hazard Mater. 2007 Jun 25;145(1-2):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
6
Controlling cyanobacterial blooms through effective flocculation and sedimentation with combined use of flocculants and phosphorus adsorbing natural soil and modified clay.通过联合使用絮凝剂和磷吸附天然土壤和改性粘土来实现有效絮凝和沉淀,从而控制蓝藻水华。
Water Res. 2016 Jun 15;97:26-38. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.057. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
7
Temporal and spatial variation in the efficiency of a Floc & Sink technique for controlling cyanobacterial blooms in a tropical reservoir.浮式生物网拦截集藻沉砂技术控制热带水库水华的时空效率变化
Harmful Algae. 2022 Aug;117:102262. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2022.102262. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
8
The efficiency of combined coagulant and ballast to remove harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a tropical shallow system.联合混凝剂和压载物对热带浅水系统中有害蓝藻水华的去除效率。
Harmful Algae. 2017 May;65:27-39. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
9
'Floc and Sink' Technique Removes Cyanobacteria and Microcystins from Tropical Reservoir Water.“絮体沉淀”技术去除热带水库水中的蓝藻和微囊藻毒素。
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Jun 8;13(6):405. doi: 10.3390/toxins13060405.
10
Critical assessment of chitosan as coagulant to remove cyanobacteria.壳聚糖作为混凝剂去除蓝藻的批判性评估。
Harmful Algae. 2017 Jun;66:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
and Polyaluminum Chloride: Coagulant Combinations for Cyanobacteria Removal in Drinking Water.以及聚合氯化铝:用于去除饮用水中蓝藻的混凝剂组合。
ACS Omega. 2025 Aug 22;10(35):39712-39723. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c03206. eCollection 2025 Sep 9.
2
Kinetics and Mechanism of Cyanobacteria Cell Removal Using Biowaste-Derived Activated Carbons with Assessment of Potential Human Health Impacts.利用生物废料衍生的活性炭去除蓝藻细胞的动力学和机制,评估其对人类健康的潜在影响。
Toxins (Basel). 2024 Jul 9;16(7):310. doi: 10.3390/toxins16070310.
3
Research on Moringa ( Lam.) in Africa.

本文引用的文献

1
Cyanobacterial blooms.蓝藻水华。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018 Aug;16(8):471-483. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0040-1.
2
Simulating water quality and ecological status of Lake Vansjø, Norway, under land-use and climate change by linking process-oriented models with a Bayesian network.通过将面向过程的模型与贝叶斯网络相链接,模拟挪威万斯佐湖的水质和生态状况在土地利用和气候变化下的变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 15;621:713-724. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.303. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
3
Critical assessment of chitosan as coagulant to remove cyanobacteria.
非洲辣木(辣木属)的研究。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jun 11;13(12):1613. doi: 10.3390/plants13121613.
壳聚糖作为混凝剂去除蓝藻的批判性评估。
Harmful Algae. 2017 Jun;66:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 May 5.
4
Coagulant plus ballast technique provides a rapid mitigation of cyanobacterial nuisance.凝聚剂加助凝剂技术可迅速减轻蓝藻滋扰。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 9;12(6):e0178976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178976. eCollection 2017.
5
The efficiency of combined coagulant and ballast to remove harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a tropical shallow system.联合混凝剂和压载物对热带浅水系统中有害蓝藻水华的去除效率。
Harmful Algae. 2017 May;65:27-39. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Chitosan as coagulant on cyanobacteria in lake restoration management may cause rapid cell lysis.壳聚糖作为蓝藻水华治理中的混凝剂可能导致细胞迅速裂解。
Water Res. 2017 Jul 1;118:121-130. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
7
Toxic cyanobacteria and drinking water: Impacts, detection, and treatment.有毒蓝藻与饮用水:影响、检测与处理。
Harmful Algae. 2016 Apr;54:174-193. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2016.01.001.
8
Editorial - A critical perspective on geo-engineering for eutrophication management in lakes.社论 - 对湖泊富营养化管理的地球工程的批判性观点。
Water Res. 2016 Jun 15;97:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.035. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
9
Controlling cyanobacterial blooms through effective flocculation and sedimentation with combined use of flocculants and phosphorus adsorbing natural soil and modified clay.通过联合使用絮凝剂和磷吸附天然土壤和改性粘土来实现有效絮凝和沉淀,从而控制蓝藻水华。
Water Res. 2016 Jun 15;97:26-38. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.057. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
10
Microalgae removal with Moringa oleifera.用辣木去除微藻。
Toxicon. 2016 Feb;110:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 11.