Suppr超能文献

凝聚剂加助凝剂技术可迅速减轻蓝藻滋扰。

Coagulant plus ballast technique provides a rapid mitigation of cyanobacterial nuisance.

作者信息

Noyma Natalia P, de Magalhães Leonardo, Miranda Marcela, Mucci Maíra, van Oosterhout Frank, Huszar Vera L M, Marinho Marcelo M, Lima Eduardo R A, Lürling Miquel

机构信息

Laboratory of Ecology and Physiology of Phytoplankton, Department of Plant Biology, University of Rio de Janeiro State, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Aquatic Ecology & Water Quality Management Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 9;12(6):e0178976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178976. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Cyanobacteria blooms are a risk to environmental health and public safety due to the potent toxins certain cyanobacteria can produce. These nuisance organisms can be removed from water bodies by biomass flocculation and sedimentation. Here, we studied the efficacy of combinations of a low dose coagulant (poly-aluminium chloride-PAC-or chitosan) with different ballast compounds (red soil, bauxite, gravel, aluminium modified zeolite and lanthanum modified bentonite) to remove cyanobacterial biomass from water collected in Funil Reservoir (Brazil). We tested the effect of different cyanobacterial biomass concentrations on removal efficiency. We also examined if zeta potential was altered by treatments. Addition of low doses of PAC and chitosan (1-8 mg Al L-1) to the cyanobacterial suspensions caused flock formation, but did not settle the cyanobacteria. When those low dose coagulants were combined with ballast, effective settling in a dose-dependent way up to 99.7% removal of the flocks could be achieved without any effect on the zeta potential and thus without potential membrane damage. Removal efficacy was influenced by the cyanobacterial biomass and at higher biomass more ballast was needed to achieve good removal. The combined coagulant-ballast technique provides a promising alternative to algaecides in lakes, ponds and reservoirs.

摘要

由于某些蓝藻能产生强效毒素,蓝藻水华对环境健康和公共安全构成威胁。这些有害生物可通过生物量絮凝和沉淀从水体中去除。在此,我们研究了低剂量混凝剂(聚合氯化铝 - PAC或壳聚糖)与不同压载化合物(红土、铝土矿、砾石、铝改性沸石和镧改性膨润土)组合从巴西富尼尔水库采集的水中去除蓝藻生物量的效果。我们测试了不同蓝藻生物量浓度对去除效率的影响。我们还研究了处理是否会改变zeta电位。向蓝藻悬浮液中添加低剂量的PAC和壳聚糖(1 - 8 mg Al L-1)会导致絮凝物形成,但无法使蓝藻沉淀。当这些低剂量混凝剂与压载物结合时,可实现有效沉淀,絮凝物去除率高达99.7%,且对zeta电位没有影响,因此不会对膜造成潜在损害。去除效果受蓝藻生物量影响,生物量越高,需要更多压载物才能实现良好的去除效果。混凝剂 - 压载物组合技术为湖泊、池塘和水库中的除藻剂提供了一种有前景的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be0/5466316/886f346a084d/pone.0178976.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Coagulant plus ballast technique provides a rapid mitigation of cyanobacterial nuisance.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 9;12(6):e0178976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178976. eCollection 2017.
2
The efficiency of combined coagulant and ballast to remove harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a tropical shallow system.
Harmful Algae. 2017 May;65:27-39. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
4
'Floc and Sink' Technique Removes Cyanobacteria and Microcystins from Tropical Reservoir Water.
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Jun 8;13(6):405. doi: 10.3390/toxins13060405.
7
The use of coagulant and natural soil to control cyanobacterial blooms in a tropical reservoir.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Aug 20;939:173378. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173378. Epub 2024 May 24.
8
Critical assessment of chitosan as coagulant to remove cyanobacteria.
Harmful Algae. 2017 Jun;66:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 May 5.
10
Impacts of the Floc and Sink technique on the phytoplankton community: A morpho-functional approach in eutrophic reservoir water.
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 15;308:114626. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114626. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

2
'Floc and Sink' Technique Removes Cyanobacteria and Microcystins from Tropical Reservoir Water.
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Jun 8;13(6):405. doi: 10.3390/toxins13060405.
4
Chitosan as a Coagulant to Remove Cyanobacteria Can Cause Microcystin Release.
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Nov 10;12(11):711. doi: 10.3390/toxins12110711.
5
Removal of Positively Buoyant in Lake Restoration.
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Nov 5;12(11):700. doi: 10.3390/toxins12110700.

本文引用的文献

1
Eutrophication and Harmful Algal Blooms: A Scientific Consensus.
Harmful Algae. 2008 Dec;8(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.006.
2
Modified local sands for the mitigation of harmful algal blooms.
Harmful Algae. 2011 May;10(4):381-387. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
3
A review on chitosan-based flocculants and their applications in water treatment.
Water Res. 2016 May 15;95:59-89. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.068. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
6
Simultaneous removal of harmful algal blooms and microcystins using microorganism- and chitosan-modified local soil.
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 May 19;49(10):6249-56. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00840. Epub 2015 May 4.
7
Synthesis and characterization of chitosan derivatives with dual-antibacterial functional groups.
Int J Biol Macromol. 2015 Apr;75:378-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.01.056. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
8
Influence of zeta potential on the flocculation of cyanobacteria cells using chitosan modified soil.
J Environ Sci (China). 2015 Feb 1;28:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.04.017. Epub 2014 Nov 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验