Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare system, Pittsburgh, PA.
Shirley Ryan Ability Lab, Chicago, IL.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr;103(4):779-789. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.094. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
To investigate the frequency and consequences of wheelchair repairs, looking at the relationship to usage, components, out-of-pocket costs, number of days affecting the user, and factors associated with the need for repairs or consequences.
Survey, cross-sectional.
Nine spinal cord injury (SCI) Model Systems centers.
Wheelchair users with SCI (N=533).
Not applicable.
Cost and incidence of wheelchair repairs and consequences and wheelchair usage within the past 6 months.
A total of 310 participants (56%) reported repairs, 127 (42%) of whom experienced at least 1 adverse consequence lasting a median of 5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2-17.3 days). Repair rates were highest for the seating system, electronics, and tires. Participants were most often stranded at home or forced to use a backup chair. Median out-of-pocket costs were $150 (IQR, $50-$620). Active users, based on type of mobility and terrain, experienced more repairs and consequences than less active users. Repairs were more common among those who were Black (odds ratio [OR], 2.42) or power wheelchair (PWC) users (OR, 1.84), whereas consequences were more common among those who were Black (OR, 2.27), PWC (OR, 2.08) or power assist users (OR, 2.76), and those who had public insurance (OR, 1.70).
Wheelchair repairs continue to affect more than 50% of wheelchair users with significant financial and personal cost. High repair rates limited participation inside and outside of the home. Consequences lasted longer than 2 weeks for many and may be minimized by a working backup chair. Disparities exist based on participant and wheelchair factors; repairs and adverse consequences appear to hit those most vulnerable with the least financial resources. Costs may be a barrier to repair completion for some individuals. This ongoing problem of high repair rates and their associated effects requires action such as higher standards, access to quicker service, and better training of users on wheelchair maintenance and repair.
调查轮椅维修的频率和后果,研究其与使用情况、部件、自付费用、影响用户天数以及与维修需求或后果相关的因素之间的关系。
调查,横断面。
9 个脊髓损伤(SCI)模型系统中心。
有 SCI 的轮椅使用者(N=533)。
不适用。
过去 6 个月内轮椅维修和后果的成本及发生率,以及轮椅的使用情况。
共有 310 名参与者(56%)报告了维修情况,其中 127 名(42%)至少经历了一次持续中位数为 5 天(四分位距[IQR],2-17.3 天)的不良后果。座椅系统、电子设备和轮胎的维修率最高。参与者最常被困在家里或被迫使用备用轮椅。自付费用中位数为 150 美元(IQR,50-620 美元)。根据移动类型和地形的活跃使用者比不活跃使用者经历更多的维修和后果。黑人(优势比[OR],2.42)或电动轮椅(PWC)使用者(OR,1.84)的维修更常见,而黑人(OR,2.27)、PWC(OR,2.08)或动力辅助使用者(OR,2.76)以及有公共保险的参与者(OR,1.70)的后果更常见。
轮椅维修继续影响超过 50%的轮椅使用者,造成重大经济和个人成本。高维修率限制了参与者在家庭内外的参与度。许多后果持续时间超过 2 周,通过备用轮椅工作可能会将其最小化。参与者和轮椅因素存在差异;对于最脆弱且资源最少的人来说,维修和不良后果似乎更严重。对于某些人来说,费用可能是维修完成的障碍。这种高维修率及其相关影响的持续问题需要采取行动,例如提高标准、更快的服务获取以及更好地培训用户进行轮椅维护和维修。