Nephrology Section, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Division of Nephrology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Jul;78(1):103-115. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
For almost 2 decades, equations that use serum creatinine, age, sex, and race to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) have included "race" as Black or non-Black. Given considerable evidence of disparities in health and health care delivery in African American communities, some regard keeping a race term in GFR equations as a practice that differentially influences access to care and kidney transplantation. Others assert that race captures important non-GFR determinants of serum creatinine and its removal from the calculation may perpetuate other disparities. The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) and American Society of Nephrology (ASN) established a task force in 2020 to reassess the inclusion of race in the estimation of GFR in the United States and its implications for diagnosis and subsequent management of patients with, or at risk for, kidney diseases. This interim report details the process, initial assessment of evidence, and values defined regarding the use of race to estimate GFR. We organized activities in phases: (1) clarify the problem and examine evidence, (2) evaluate different approaches to address use of race in GFR estimation, and (3) make recommendations. In phase 1, we constructed statements about the evidence and defined values regarding equity and disparities; race and racism; GFR measurement, estimation, and equation performance; laboratory standardization; and patient perspectives. We also identified several approaches to estimate GFR and a set of attributes to evaluate these approaches. Building on evidence and values, the attributes of alternative approaches to estimate GFR will be evaluated in the next phases and recommendations will be made.
近 20 年来,使用血清肌酐、年龄、性别和种族来估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)的方程一直将“种族”分为黑人或非黑人。鉴于非洲裔美国人社区在健康和医疗保健提供方面存在明显差异,一些人认为在 GFR 方程中保留种族术语是一种会对获得护理和肾脏移植机会产生差异影响的做法。另一些人则断言,种族可以捕捉到血清肌酐的重要非 GFR 决定因素,如果从计算中删除种族因素,可能会导致其他差异持续存在。美国国家肾脏基金会(NKF)和美国肾脏病学会(ASN)于 2020 年成立了一个工作组,重新评估在美国使用种族来估算 GFR 的问题及其对诊断和随后管理患有肾脏疾病或有患病风险的患者的影响。本中期报告详细介绍了该过程、对证据的初步评估以及与使用种族来估算 GFR 相关的价值观定义。我们分阶段组织了活动:(1)阐明问题并检查证据,(2)评估解决 GFR 估算中种族使用问题的不同方法,以及(3)提出建议。在第 1 阶段,我们构建了有关证据的陈述,并定义了与公平和差异、种族和种族主义、GFR 测量、估算和方程性能、实验室标准化以及患者观点相关的价值观。我们还确定了几种估算 GFR 的方法以及一组评估这些方法的属性。在接下来的阶段,将根据证据和价值观评估替代估算 GFR 方法的属性,并提出建议。