• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎融合术中重叠的持续时间并不能预测手术结果。

Duration of overlap during lumbar fusion does not predict outcomes.

作者信息

Farooqi Ali S, Borja Austin J, Detchou Donald K E, Glauser Gregory, Strouz Krista, McClintock Scott D, Malhotra Neil R

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

McKenna EpiLog Fellowship in Population Health at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; West Chester University, The West Chester Statistical Institute and Department of Mathematics, West Chester, PA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;205:106610. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106610. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106610
PMID:33845404
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between degree of surgical overlap and adverse postoperative outcomes remains poorly defined. This study aims to evaluate the impact of increasing duration of overlap on lumbar fusion outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

1302 adult patients undergoing overlapping surgery during single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion at a multi-hospital, university health system were retrospectively assessed. Amount of overlap was calculated as a percentage of total overlap time. Patients were separated into groups with the most (top 10% of patients) and least amounts of overlap (bottom 40% of patients). Using Coarsened Exact Matching, patients with the most and least amounts of overlap were matched on demographics alone, then on both demographics and attending surgeon. Univariate analysis was performed for the whole population and both matched cohorts to compare amount of overlap to risk of adverse postsurgical events. Significance for all analyses was p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

Duration of overlap was not associated with outcomes in the whole population, demographic-matched, or surgeon-matched analyses. Before exact matching, patients with the most amount of overlap had a significantly higher CCI score (p = 0.031) and shorter length of surgery (p = 0.006). In the demographic matched cohort, patients with increased overlap had a significantly shorter length of surgery (p = 0.001) only. In the surgeon matched cohort, there were no differences in length of surgery or CCI score.

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of surgical overlap does not predict adverse outcomes following lumbar fusion. These results suggest that overlapping surgery is a safe practice within this common neurosurgical indication.

摘要

引言

手术重叠程度与术后不良结局之间的关系仍未明确界定。本研究旨在评估重叠时间增加对腰椎融合术结局的影响。

患者与方法

对在一家多医院的大学卫生系统接受单节段、仅后路腰椎融合术中重叠手术的1302例成年患者进行回顾性评估。重叠量计算为总重叠时间的百分比。患者被分为重叠量最大(患者前10%)和最小(患者后40%)的组。使用粗化精确匹配,仅根据人口统计学对重叠量最大和最小的患者进行匹配,然后根据人口统计学和主刀医生进行匹配。对整个人群以及两个匹配队列进行单因素分析,以比较重叠量与术后不良事件风险。所有分析的显著性为p值<0.05。

结果

在整个人群、人口统计学匹配或医生匹配分析中,重叠持续时间与结局均无关联。在精确匹配之前,重叠量最大的患者CCI评分显著更高(p = 0.031),手术时间更短(p = 0.006)。在人口统计学匹配队列中,重叠增加的患者仅手术时间显著更短(p = 0.001)。在医生匹配队列中,手术时间或CCI评分无差异。

结论

手术重叠持续时间不能预测腰椎融合术后的不良结局。这些结果表明,在这种常见的神经外科适应症范围内,重叠手术是一种安全的做法。

相似文献

1
Duration of overlap during lumbar fusion does not predict outcomes.腰椎融合术中重叠的持续时间并不能预测手术结果。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;205:106610. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106610. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Varying Degree of Overlap Following the Critical Steps of Lumbar Fusion and Short-term Outcomes.腰椎融合关键步骤后重叠程度的变化与短期结果。
Clin Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 1;36(10):E423-E429. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001504. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
5
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
6
Does Resilience Change in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgery? A Retrospective Comparative Study Utilizing the Brief Resilience Scale.接受肩部手术的患者的心理韧性会发生变化吗?一项使用简易心理韧性量表的回顾性比较研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 1;483(6):1049-1059. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003368. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD012421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012421.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing Nonconcurrent Overlapping Surgery Is Not Associated With Outcome Changes in Lumbar Fusion.增加非同期重叠手术与腰椎融合术的预后变化无关。
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 May 25;16(4):651-9. doi: 10.14444/8305.