Shi H X, Wang Z F, Sun X H
Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 13;101(14):1015-1019. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200713-02110.
To explore the characteristics of esophageal motility and clinical presentation in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients of different age groups. This was a case-control study. Confirmed GERD patients in the Department of Gastroenterology of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2015 to September 2018 were enrolled and divided into two groups: elderly group (≥60 years old) and young and middle-aged group (<60 years old). Characteristics of gender, disease course, clinical symptoms, esophageal motility, gastroscopic manifestations and esophageal hiatus function of patients in the two groups were analyzed. A total of 250 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 61 patients in elderly group and 189 in young and middle-aged group. There were no significant differences in gender ((male/female: 24/37 vs 78/111, >0.05) and disease course((4.9±4.2) years vs(4.5±3.8)years, >0.05) between the two groups. However, there were significant differences in typical symptoms (acid regurgitation and heartburn) and atypical symptoms (chest pain, cough, foreign body sensation in pharynx, etc.) (typical/atypical symptoms: 35/26 vs 146/43, <0.01) between the two groups. Compared with young and middle-aged group, upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressure was lower ((65±28) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)vs (74±28) mmHg, <0.05), but the percentage of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) (78.7%(48/61) vs 65.1%(123/189),<0.05) and DeMeester score (16.3(6.0,36.3) vs 6.4(2.5,18.0), <0.05) were higher in elderly group. There were no significant differences in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure and distal contractile integral (DCI) between the two groups. Higher proportion of grade C and D reflux esophagitis,and grade C and D reflux esophagitis complicated with esophageal hiatus dysfunction was observed in elderly group compared with young and middle-aged group (2.04%(8/49) vs 0.65%(1/155); 14.29%(7/49) vs 0(0/155); both <0.01). Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a negative correlation between UES resting pressure and age(=-0.145, <0.05), while there was a positive correlation between the LES length and age (=0.129, <0.05). Compared with young and middle-aged GERD patients, the atypical symptoms, lower LES resting pressure, increased incidence of ineffective esophageal motility and acid exposure were more prominent in the elderly. Considering that anti-reflux function was weakened, long-term acid suppressants may be needed in elderly patients.
探讨不同年龄组胃食管反流病(GERD)患者食管动力特点及临床表现。本研究为病例对照研究。选取2015年1月至2018年9月在北京协和医院消化内科确诊的GERD患者,分为两组:老年组(≥60岁)和中青年组(<60岁)。分析两组患者的性别、病程、临床症状、食管动力、胃镜表现及食管裂孔功能特点。共有250例患者符合纳入标准,其中老年组61例,中青年组189例。两组患者性别(男性/女性:24/37 比 78/111,>0.05)和病程((4.9±4.2)年 比 (4.5±3.8)年,>0.05)差异无统计学意义。然而,两组患者典型症状(反酸、烧心)和非典型症状(胸痛、咳嗽、咽部异物感等)差异有统计学意义(典型/非典型症状:35/26 比 146/43,<0.01)。与中青年组相比,老年组食管上括约肌(UES)静息压较低((65±28) mmHg(1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa)比 (74±28) mmHg,<0.05),但无效食管动力(IEM)百分比(78.7%(48/61)比 65.1%(123/189),<0.05)和DeMeester评分(16.3(6.0,36.3)比 6.4(2.5,18.0),<0.05)较高。两组食管下括约肌(LES)静息压和远端收缩积分(DCI)差异无统计学意义。与中青年组相比,老年组C级和D级反流性食管炎比例以及C级和D级反流性食管炎合并食管裂孔功能障碍的比例更高(2.04%(8/49)比 0.65%(1/155);14.29%(7/49)比 0(0/155);均<0.01)。Pearson相关分析显示,UES静息压与年龄呈负相关(r = -0.145,<0.05),而LES长度与年龄呈正相关(r = 0.129,<0.05)。与中青年GERD患者相比,老年患者非典型症状、LES静息压降低、无效食管动力和酸暴露发生率增加更为突出。考虑到抗反流功能减弱,老年患者可能需要长期使用抑酸剂。