Richter Jan, Pietzner Anne, Koenig Julian, Thayer Julian F, Pané-Farré Christiane A, Gerlach Alexander L, Gloster Andrew T, Wittchen Hans-Ulrich, Lang Thomas, Alpers Georg W, Helbig-Lang Sylvia, Deckert Jürgen, Fydrich Thomas, Fehm Lydia, Ströhle Andreas, Kircher Tilo, Arolt Volker, Hamm Alfons O
Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, University of Greifswald, Franz-Mehring-Str. 47, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Section for Experimental Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 12;11(1):7960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86867-y.
Theoretically, panic disorder and agoraphobia pathology can be conceptualized as a cascade of dynamically changing defensive responses to threat cues from inside the body. Guided by this trans-diagnostic model we tested the interaction between defensive activation and vagal control as a marker of prefrontal inhibition of subcortical defensive activation. We investigated ultra-short-term changes of vagally controlled high frequency heart rate variability (HRV) during a standardized threat challenge (entrapment) in n = 232 patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia, and its interaction with various indices of defensive activation. We found a strong inverse relationship between HRV and heart rate during threat, which was stronger at the beginning of exposure. Patients with a strong increase in heart rate showed a deactivation of prefrontal vagal control while patients showing less heart rate acceleration showed an increase in vagal control. Moreover, vagal control collapsed in case of imminent threat, i.e., when body symptoms increase and seem to get out of control. In these cases of defensive action patients either fled from the situation or experienced a panic attack. Active avoidance, panic attacks, and increased sympathetic arousal are associated with an inability to maintain vagal control over the heart suggesting that teaching such regulation strategies during exposure treatment might be helpful to keep prefrontal control, particularly during the transition zone from post-encounter to circa strike defense.Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN80046034.
从理论上讲,惊恐障碍和广场恐惧症的病理可被概念化为对来自身体内部的威胁线索的一系列动态变化的防御反应。在这个跨诊断模型的指导下,我们测试了防御激活与迷走神经控制之间的相互作用,以此作为前额叶对皮层下防御激活抑制的一个标志。我们调查了n = 232名惊恐障碍和广场恐惧症患者在标准化威胁挑战(被困)期间迷走神经控制的高频心率变异性(HRV)的超短期变化,以及它与各种防御激活指标的相互作用。我们发现,在威胁期间,HRV与心率之间存在强烈的负相关关系,在暴露开始时更强。心率大幅增加的患者表现出前额叶迷走神经控制的失活,而心率加速较少的患者则表现出迷走神经控制的增加。此外,在迫在眉睫的威胁情况下,即身体症状增加且似乎失去控制时,迷走神经控制会崩溃。在这些防御行动的情况下,患者要么逃离现场,要么经历惊恐发作。主动回避、惊恐发作和交感神经唤醒增加与无法维持对心脏的迷走神经控制有关,这表明在暴露治疗期间教授这种调节策略可能有助于保持前额叶控制,特别是在从遭遇后到大约打击防御的过渡阶段。试验注册号:ISRCTN80046034。