• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉夹层的不同近端着陆区的冰冻象鼻技术。

Frozen elephant trunk technique with different proximal landing zone for aortic dissection.

机构信息

Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jul 26;33(2):286-292. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab086.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivab086
PMID:33846749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8923426/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to evaluate early and midterm outcomes after the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure with different proximal landing zones in patients with aortic dissection.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with type A and type B aortic dissection that extended down to the abdominal aorta were enrolled in the study. All of the patients had the FET procedure. The patients were divided in 2 groups according to the level of the proximal landing zone: the zone 2 (Z2) group and zone 3 (Z3) group. Early and midterm outcomes including the false lumen (FL) thrombosis rate were monitored in both groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of stroke, delirium and spinal cord ischaemia was 5.9% vs 3.7% (P = 0.533), 5.9% vs 7.4% (P = 0.903) and 5.9% vs 0 (P = 0.533) in the Z2 and Z3 groups, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 9.1% in both groups. The mean distal landing zone was T7.5 (T7; T9) in the Z2 group vs T9 (T8; T10) in the Z3 group (P = 0.668). The 2-year overall survival was 62.2% with no significant difference in the Z2 and Z3 groups (61.6% vs 64.2%; P = 0.940). There were no aortic-related deaths during the follow-up period. Freedom from reintervention at 24 months was 73% and was comparable between Z2 and Z3 (74.1% vs 91.7%; P = 0.123). The rate of early complete FL thrombosis was comparable in the Z2 and Z3 groups. By 24 months of observation in the Z3 group, the rate of complete FL thrombosis was significantly higher (60% vs 77%; P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences were observed between landing zones 2 and 3 during the FET procedure with regard to early outcomes. Proximalization of the FET was associated with a shorter FL thrombosis in the midterm follow-up period that affected the distal aortic reintervention rate.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估不同近端着陆区在主动脉夹层患者中行冰冻象鼻手术(FET)的早期和中期结果。

方法

本研究纳入了 44 例累及降主动脉的 A 型和 B 型主动脉夹层患者。所有患者均接受 FET 手术。根据近端着陆区水平将患者分为 2 组:Z2 组和 Z3 组。监测两组的早期和中期结果,包括假腔(FL)血栓形成率。

结果

Z2 组和 Z3 组的卒中、谵妄和脊髓缺血发生率分别为 5.9%比 3.7%(P=0.533)、5.9%比 7.4%(P=0.903)和 5.9%比 0(P=0.533)。两组的 30 天死亡率均为 9.1%。Z2 组的平均远端着陆区为 T7.5(T7;T9),Z3 组为 T9(T8;T10)(P=0.668)。2 年总生存率分别为 62.2%,Z2 组和 Z3 组无显著差异(61.6%比 64.2%;P=0.940)。随访期间无主动脉相关死亡。24 个月时免于再次干预的比例为 73%,Z2 组和 Z3 组相当(74.1%比 91.7%;P=0.123)。Z2 组和 Z3 组早期完全 FL 血栓形成率相当。Z3 组观察到 24 个月时完全 FL 血栓形成率明显升高(60%比 77%;P=0.046)。

结论

在 FET 手术中,着陆区 2 和 3 之间的早期结果无统计学差异。近端化 FET 与中期随访期间 FL 血栓形成更短有关,这影响了远端主动脉再次干预的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4086/8923426/9352e1ba02f6/ivab086f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4086/8923426/9352e1ba02f6/ivab086f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4086/8923426/9352e1ba02f6/ivab086f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Frozen elephant trunk technique with different proximal landing zone for aortic dissection.主动脉夹层的不同近端着陆区的冰冻象鼻技术。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jul 26;33(2):286-292. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab086.
2
Proximalization of Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure: Zone 0 or 1 versus Zone 2 or 3 Arch Repair.主动脉弓部修复中冰冻象鼻术的近端化处理:区域 0 或 1 与区域 2 或 3
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar;72(2):89-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757631. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
3
A more proximal landing zone is preferred for thoracic endovascular repair of acute type B aortic dissections.对于急性B型主动脉夹层的胸段血管腔内修复术,更靠近近端的着陆区更为可取。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.036. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
4
Frozen elephant trunk with straight vascular prosthesis: single-center experience with a review of current trends.带直型血管假体的冰冻象鼻技术:单中心经验及当前趋势综述
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Jun;61(3):301-307. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11401-0. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
5
Comparative study of the frozen elephant trunk and classical elephant trunk techniques to supplement total arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection†.比较研究冷冻象鼻技术与经典象鼻技术在急性 A 型主动脉夹层全弓置换术中的应用。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Sep 1;56(3):579-586. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz104.
6
Follow-up outcomes after the frozen elephant trunk technique in chronic type B dissection.慢性B型主动脉夹层冻结象鼻技术后的随访结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 May 1;57(5):904-911. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz348.
7
Comparison of Short and Midterm Aortic Reinterventions in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Treated by Frozen Elephant Trunk or Conventional Arch Repair.比较经冷冻象鼻技术或传统主动脉弓修复术治疗的急性A型主动脉夹层的短期和中期主动脉再干预。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Sep;95:3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 9.
8
Outcomes of long versus short stent cronus hybrid prosthesis in type A aortic dissection: A single centre experience.主动脉夹层 A 型 Long 与 Short 支架 Cronus 杂交假体的结果:单中心经验。
J Card Surg. 2021 Sep;36(9):3261-3268. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15766. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
9
False lumen thrombosis after frozen elephant trunk procedure in acute and chronic aortic dissection.急性和慢性主动脉夹层冷冻象鼻手术后的假腔血栓形成
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2022 Apr;63(2):195-201. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.21.11800-2. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
Determining the Optimal Proximal Landing Zone for TEVAR in the Aortic Arch: Comparing the Occurrence of the Bird-Beak Phenomenon in Zone 0 vs Zones 1 and 2.确定主动脉弓 TEVAR 的最佳近端着陆区:比较 0 区与 1 区和 2 区鸟嘴现象的发生情况。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Jun;27(3):368-376. doi: 10.1177/1526602820914269. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
E-vita OPEN NEO in the treatment of acute or chronic aortic pathologies: first interim results of the NEOS study.E-vita OPEN NEO 在急性或慢性主动脉病变治疗中的应用:NEOS 研究的初步中期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jun 3;65(6). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae206.
2
Evidence-based frozen elephant trunk practice: a narrative review.基于证据的冷冻象鼻技术应用:一项叙述性综述
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023 Dec 15;13(6):1104-1117. doi: 10.21037/cdt-23-300. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
3
Analysing debranching techniques in Frozen Elephant Trunk procedures: a narrative literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the conventional frozen elephant trunk implantation technique with a modified implantation technique in zone 1.1区传统冷冻象鼻植入技术与改良植入技术的比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Apr 1;57(4):669-675. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz234.
2
Which Frozen Elephant Trunk Offers the Optimal Solution? Reflections From Essen Group.哪种冰冻象鼻提供了最佳解决方案?埃森集团的反思。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;31(4):679-685. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.05.038. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
3
Zone 1 Debranching for Frozen Elephant Trunk and Whole-Body Perfusion.
分析“冰冻象鼻”手术中的去分支技术:一项叙述性文献综述
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023 Apr 28;13(2):427-439. doi: 10.21037/cdt-22-502. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
4
Frozen Elephant Trunk for Aortic Dissection Using Different Hybrid Grafts: Preliminary Results from a Prospective Study.使用不同杂交移植物的冷冻象鼻技术治疗主动脉夹层:一项前瞻性研究的初步结果
J Pers Med. 2023 Apr 30;13(5):784. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050784.
5
Frozen Elephant Trunk Sizing: A 30,000-Feet Perspective with Thoraflex Hybrid Stent Graft.冰冻象鼻技术的尺寸选择:使用Thoraflex Hybrid支架型人工血管的宏观视角
Aorta (Stamford). 2022 Aug;10(4):182-190. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756667. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
Incidence of Distal Stent Graft Induced New Entry vs. Aortic Remodeling Associated With Frozen Elephant Trunk.远端支架移植物诱导的新破口发生率与“冰冻象鼻”相关的主动脉重塑的比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 10;9:875078. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.875078. eCollection 2022.
用于冷冻象鼻技术和全身灌注的1区去分支术
Innovations (Phila). 2019 Aug;14(4):361-364. doi: 10.1177/1556984519854823. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
4
Open distal anastomosis in the frozen elephant trunk technique: initial experiences and preliminary results of arch zone 2 versus arch zone 3†.开放的远端吻合技术在冰冻象鼻术中的应用:2 区与 3 区弓部的初步经验和结果†。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Sep 1;56(3):564-571. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz103.
5
Multicentre experience with two frozen elephant trunk prostheses in the treatment of acute aortic dissection†.两例冰冻象鼻主动脉假体治疗急性主动脉夹层的多中心经验†。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Sep 1;56(3):572-578. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz037.
6
Distal aortic remodelling after the standard and the elongated frozen elephant trunk procedure.标准及延长冷冻象鼻手术后的主动脉远端重塑
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Jul 1;29(1):117-123. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz026.
7
The frozen elephant trunk treatment is the operation of choice for all kinds of arch disease.冷冻象鼻技术是治疗各类主动脉弓疾病的首选术式。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Aug;59(4):540-546. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10597-0. Epub 2018 May 25.
8
Impact of reimplantation technique of supra-aortic branches in total arch replacement on stroke rate and survival: results from the ARCH registry.全主动脉弓置换术中升主动脉分支再植入技术对脑卒中发生率和生存率的影响:来自 ARCH 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Dec 1;54(6):1045-1051. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy194.
9
The risk of spinal cord injury during the frozen elephant trunk procedure in acute aortic dissection.急性主动脉夹层冻结象鼻手术期间脊髓损伤的风险。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Jun 1;26(6):972-976. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx432.
10
Open Stented Grafts for Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique: Technical Aspects and Current Outcomes.用于冰冻象鼻技术的开放式带支架移植物:技术要点与当前结果
Aorta (Stamford). 2015 Aug 1;3(4):122-35. doi: 10.12945/j.aorta.2015.14.062. eCollection 2015 Aug.