Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Center for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Prenat Diagn. 2023 Oct;43(11):1394-1405. doi: 10.1002/pd.6444. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
There is increasing evidence supporting the clinical utility of next generation sequencing for identifying fetal genetic disorders. However, there are limited data on the demand for and accessibility of these tests, as well as payer coverage in the prenatal context. We sought to identify clinician perspectives on the utility of prenatal exome sequencing (ES) and on equitable access to genomic technologies for the care of pregnancies complicated by fetal structural anomalies.
We conducted two focus group discussions and six interviews with a total of 13 clinicians (11 genetic counselors; 2 Maternal Fetal Medicine/Geneticists) from U.S. academic centers and community clinics.
Participants strongly supported ES for prenatal diagnostic testing in pregnancies with fetal structural anomalies. Participants emphasized the value of prenatal ES as an opportunity for a continuum of care before, during, and after a pregnancy, not solely as informing decisions about abortions. Cost and coverage of the test was the main access barrier, and research was the main pathway to access ES in academic centers.
Further integrating the perspectives of additional key stakeholders are important for understanding clinical utility, developing policies and practices to address access barriers, and assuring equitable provision of prenatal diagnostic testing.
越来越多的证据支持下一代测序在识别胎儿遗传疾病方面的临床应用。然而,关于这些测试的需求和可及性,以及在产前环境下的支付者覆盖范围,数据有限。我们旨在确定临床医生对产前外显子组测序 (ES) 的实用性以及基因组技术在妊娠复杂胎儿结构异常方面的公平获取的看法。
我们在美国学术中心和社区诊所的 13 名临床医生(11 名遗传咨询师;2 名母胎医学/遗传学家)进行了两次焦点小组讨论和六次访谈。
参与者强烈支持将 ES 用于产前诊断测试胎儿结构异常的妊娠。参与者强调了产前 ES 的价值,因为它为妊娠前、妊娠中和妊娠后提供了一个连续的护理机会,而不仅仅是为了告知关于流产的决策。测试的成本和覆盖范围是主要的准入障碍,而研究是在学术中心获得 ES 的主要途径。
进一步整合其他主要利益相关者的观点,对于理解临床实用性、制定解决准入障碍的政策和实践以及确保公平提供产前诊断测试非常重要。