Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jul-Aug;47(4):829-840. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0857.
The diagnosis and treatment of female urethral stricture disease (FUSD) are practiced variably due to the scarcity of data on evaluation, variable definitions, and lack of long-term surgical outcomes. FUSD is difficult to rule out solely on the basis of a successful calibration with 14F catheter. In this study, we have tried to characterize the variable clinical presentation of FUSD, the diagnostic utility of calibration, videourodynamic study(VUDS), and urethroscopy in planning surgical management.
A retrospective review of records of 16 patients who underwent surgical management of FUSD was analyzed. The clinical history, examination findings, and the results of all the investigations (including uroflowmetry, VUDS findings, urethroscopy) they underwent, the procedures they had undergone ,and the follow-up data were studied.
A total of 16 patients underwent surgical management of FUSD. 13 out of 16 patients had successful calibration with 14F catheter on the initial presentation. These 13 patients on VUDS demonstrated significant BOO and had variable stigmata of stricture on urethroscopy. The mean IPSS, flow rate, and PVR at presentation and after urethroplasty were 23.88±4.95, 7.72±4.25mL/s, 117.06±74.46mL and 3.50±3.44, 22.34±4.80mL/s, and 12.50±8.50mL, respectively. (p < 0.05). The mean flow rate after endo dilation(17F) (n=12) was 11.4±2.5mL/s while after urethroplasty improved to 20.30±4.19mL/s and was statistically significant(p < 0.05).
An adept correlation between clinical assessment, urethroscopy findings, and VUDS is key in objectively identifying FUSD and planning surgical management. A good caliber of the urethra is not sufficient enough to rule out a significant obstruction due to FUSD. Early urethroplasty provides significantly better outcomes in patients who have failed dilation as a treatment.
由于评估数据稀缺、定义变量多样以及缺乏长期手术结果,女性尿道狭窄疾病(FUSD)的诊断和治疗存在差异。仅根据 14F 导管校准成功排除 FUSD 较为困难。本研究旨在分析 FUSD 多变的临床特征,以及校准、尿动力学研究(VUDS)和尿道镜检查在规划手术治疗中的诊断作用。
回顾性分析 16 例行 FUSD 手术治疗患者的病历。研究患者的临床病史、检查结果,以及他们接受的所有检查(包括尿流率、VUDS 结果、尿道镜检查)、接受的手术程序和随访数据。
16 例患者接受了 FUSD 手术治疗。16 例患者中,13 例在初始表现时通过 14F 导管校准成功。这 13 例患者在 VUDS 上表现出显著的 BOO,并在尿道镜下显示出不同程度的狭窄迹象。就诊时和尿道成形术后的平均 IPSS、流量率和 PVR 分别为 23.88±4.95、7.72±4.25mL/s、117.06±74.46mL 和 3.50±3.44、22.34±4.80mL/s、12.50±8.50mL,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。12 例行内镜扩张(17F)后平均流量率为 11.4±2.5mL/s,而尿道成形术后提高至 20.30±4.19mL/s,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。
熟练地将临床评估、尿道镜检查结果和 VUDS 进行关联,对于客观地识别 FUSD 并规划手术治疗至关重要。尿道具有良好的口径并不能充分排除因 FUSD 引起的明显梗阻。对于作为治疗方法失败的患者,早期尿道成形术可提供更好的治疗效果。